All Advertisers
| All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
 New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
10th April 2009
| #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 256
Thread Starter | What's the difference between the Rev A or Rev D of the 1176 compressors?
I am going to build those 1176 diy clones but stuck with a choice of whether going the Rev A or rev D way. What are the sonic differences between the two and which would you recommend to be a better compressor for vocals or more general compressor. Whats the benefit of going Rev A, are they both Low Noise (LN)? |
|  |
|
10th April 2009
| #2 |
| Lives for gear  Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 812
|
The low noise circuit was added with Rev C, when the designation officially become 1176LN. The revision history is here: UA WebZine "Compression Obsession" August 03 | 1176 and LA-2A Revision History. Sorry that I've never had a Rev A, only D/E, so I can't provide the sonic comparison. Hopefully somebody else will. Hope this helps at least a little!
__________________ "Go back and re-mix your fav test mix making sure that at every place in all chains (including between all plug-ins) level never gets bigger than -6dBr. Make sure your final output also never peaks beyond -6dBr. Now do the comparison between this ITB mix and a similar OTB mix. You might have a big surprise." - Paul Frindle |
|
| |
New Reply 
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Difference between Yamaha's Rev 5 and Rev 7? | E Orjatsalo | Low End Theory | 3 | 10th November 2005 10:07 AM |
| 1176 Rev. F differences? from rev. D - E | GMR | High end | 6 | 15th June 2004 10:37 PM |
| |
