I need ideas...stereo imaging for lead vocal - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


I need ideas...stereo imaging for lead vocal

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th April 2003   #1
Gear nut
 
Dynodawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 135

Thread Starter
I need ideas...stereo imaging for lead vocal

I've been racking up way too much time experimenting with a stereo image for a lead vocals and I'm getting nowhere. First, I like my vocals fairly dry, no verb and compressed hard with an 1176. I have tried stereo micing with several different setups (xy, mid-side, spaced pair, close mic-room mic) but never can get it to sound right in mono. I've flipped the phase, delayed one channel but it always sounds like crap in mono.

Lately, I tried the trick copying a single vocal track on my HDR24/96, panning one L, the other R and treating them slightly different with EQ and slight ambiance only to one side. It gives it a wider, more interesting image. Maybee I'm on the right track here?

Anyone have any other ideas? I've listened closely to material where the lead vocal has a great stereo image and when I hit mono, the vocal is perfectly clean, free of any phasing.

Sure could use some good suggestions...

Thanks,
Dyno
Dynodawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2003   #2
Lives for gear
 
ELI-173's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 542

Stereo Imaging for lead vocal

I think you are definately on the right track by treating each side slightly differently. I find myself going with three tracks: one nice and raw up front and center with attention paid to the mid-hi frequency eq. The other two I drag around slightly, pan hard, set back a bit, and compress differently, eq differently, and I use slight chorusing. It's a total vibe thing. When it feels right, it feels right.

anyway,
just some thoughts!

stike stike
ELI-173 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2003   #3
Lives for gear
 
Screws's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 733

I've done a bunch of things in this area, some sounded good and some sucked bad.

Slight pitch up left - pitch down right.

Slight (10 - 20 ms.) delay left - different amount right. (Beware phase cancellation here)

Using two LDC mics on original vocal and panning slightly and eqing slightly different. (Beware stereo image shift here)

Play original track thru a monitor in a room and setup stereo mics as ambient sound. (Good bye dry, hello room reverb)

TC Electronic M3000 Doubling Effect. (some songs good - some puke)

Good luck on your hunt for a sound. Don't think for a minute that your experimentation time is wasted, it's more valuable than the actual result that you'll end up with.
__________________
Steve Cruz
Cruzified Music
Florida
Screws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2003   #4
Lives for gear
 
e-cue's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Lost Angeles
Posts: 4,069

I'm not sure exactly what you are going for, but you could try this out:
Take your 2 channels that have the lead (or mult of lead on 2, or lead bus return,etc) and put graphic eq's (usually, the more bands - the better) on each insert. Boost on one band on the left channel, then cut on the same band on the right channel. Do this all the way down (usually around 3 db works for me, but each situation is different). The Altec and Sphere graphic's work pretty good for this. If you're happy with the way it sounds at this point, leave it. If you feel like you need more width/mono capability or it just sounds too quazi, bus your leads through your eq's so the lead's stay intact, boost and cut the channels as much as possible, then send this to an Edison or Desper Spatializer or you could also try just putting a 5ms delay on one side, but the edison or other spatializers usually work better. Add the processed channels in to taste and check it in mono. You'll loose some of it, but it should be at an acceptable rate to were it still sounds proportional to the rest of the song in mono.
e-cue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2003   #5
Lives for gear
 
atticus's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Ohio
Posts: 1,581

I've gotten good results by using a mono mic as usual on the vocals and then putting a binaural mic further back in the room. Leave the mono mic dry, and put any efects on the binaural channels. Works really well for me.
__________________
David Seymour
Analog Audio Works
330-354-1576
atticus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2003   #6
Lives for gear
 
doug_hti's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: Calabasas, California
Posts: 1,142

couple things have worked for me and they sound natural IME

DELAY
REVERB
HARMONIZER

Stereo Delay - put on a quarter note or eigth note delay, the delay return is panned hard right/left. Feedback, anywhere from 13% to 20%. You can use a LPF if you like, maybe 10k. Sometimes I send the signal to a touch of the reverb as well, but you may not be into that. Put it up to where you hear it, then pull it back a touch to where you don't hear it. You may want to experiment with slightly changing the times of one side to the other. I think a dot is too long for voxes though.

REVERB - plate, 1.5-2.0 secondsish, predelay way up there 50ms or so, stereo return hard right and left. Put it down enough to where you don't hear it, but can tell when it's gone. If you don't use reverb, you may have a hard time of getting the vox to sound wide, as compression and delay on the vox will bring it straight out to your nose.

Harmonizer - I usually use +15ish on one side and usually -12 or so on the other. You can match them or whatever, I just have had better results mixing it up, but I usually like it up more than down, song dependent I guess. You can pan them hard right or left, but I usually do about 70% to each side, it seems to gel the lead to the harmonizer. I then send the harmonizer return signal to a touch of the reverb, you can send it to the delay as well.
__________________
doug
doug_hti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th April 2003   #7
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 12

One thing I've tried that could work is this - take the mono vox and bus it out to 2 channels - add a VERY LIGHT chorus effect on both, but flip the phase on one of them. In mono, the effect disappears while in stereo you can tweak the imaging as you wish.
Greenshoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2003   #8
Gear nut
 
Dynodawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 135

Thread Starter
Thanks for all the ideas so far.... very creative. I'll be trying some out tonight.

Dyno
Dynodawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2003   #9
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: MAINE
Posts: 786

I don't think this is going to rock your world but try some real doubling, sing a second track but make sure it's real tight with the first one,and find the places where your voice thins out and sounds fuller with 2, not all the way through.
Sometimes its fun to sing like 10 tracks or more(whatever you've got time for) do each one and mute after each, you'll have alot of listening and sorting to do but its fun when you've recorded something that you can't figure out how you sang or played it!
Of course harmonies and then the pink floyd octave parts are fun if the song dictates that, have fun
daniel
FOURTHTUNZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2003   #10
Gear nut
 
Dynodawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 135

Thread Starter
One cool thing I tried tonight was to cut a vocal with the monitors cranked in the live room, no headphones. I know this is an old trick, but I've never tried it. Scince I don't like to use any reverb or delay, this gives a totally natural and "live" feel. I do need to get real close to the Lawson though, 3-4" to avoid too much room. The track still has all the"in your faceness" and again, I'm getting that live, real vibe I've been looking for. All my other vocal tracks sound pretty sterile and lifeless compared to this. I know it aint stereo, but I'm going to try copying the track and do the L/R pan thing with some of the ideas mentioned above. I'll keep you guys posted.

Dyno
Dynodawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2003   #11
One with big hooves
 
Jay Kahrs's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2002
Location: Earth, NYC metro
Posts: 5,899


Send a message via AIM to Jay Kahrs Send a message via Skype™ to Jay Kahrs
Guitar pedals are always cool. Flangers, chorus, phasers etc. Bring them back in slightly to one side and under the lead vocal. If it has a stereo output use that on both sides but pan it wider. I'll also do the Stereo Vitalizer bit from time to time, I'll do it on my effects return though and push something like ping-pong delays waaayyy the **** out of the sides of the speakers. Stereo? It's out there like Pluto.

In mono it gets thrown under the bus.
__________________
J. 'Moose' Kahrs
producer|mixer|recordist
MooseAudio.com
mooseaudio.bandcamp.com
Quote:
All you need to make a record is a mic, some tape and maybe some bad reverb...
Jay Kahrs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2003   #12
Lives for gear
 
Ted Nightshade's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: state of jefferson
Posts: 1,328

Track it live in a room with stereo mics on an accompanying instrument or instruments, preferably at 15-20' distance for a nice delay on the bleed. The stereo bleed can interact with the vocal track in amazing ways.
Ted Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2003   #13
Gear nut
 
Dynodawg's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: Idaho
Posts: 135

Thread Starter
Ted,

Do you mean to track the whole mix in stereo in the live room thru monitors and feed it back hard L/R into the mix, or track the vocal in stereo like I did with the monitor bleed?

Dyno
Dynodawg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2003   #14
Lives for gear
 
Ted Nightshade's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Location: state of jefferson
Posts: 1,328

Ted,

Do you mean to track the whole mix in stereo in the live room thru monitors and feed it back hard L/R into the mix, or track the vocal in stereo like I did with the monitor bleed?
-----------
Let's see. Say you have a tune with an instrument that can be advantageously mic'ed in stereo- drums, leslie, piano, whatever.

Track the vocal and the other instrument simultaneously in the live room. Have a close mic on vocals, dialed to minimize bleed from the other instrument, and a stereo pair on the piano (or whatever), dialed to both get a nice piano sound and some bleed from the vocal. The vocalist will probably have to sing pretty loud to arrange this.

I think this way because I rarely use more than a few tracks.

An alternative would be to just put a stereo pair of room mics somewhere nice in a room where a vocal is being tracked by itself, into a close mic. Presto, stereo ambience, and if the stereo pair is far enough away, a nice delay on the ambience.
Ted Nightshade is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th April 2003   #15
Gear interested
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 7

I'm not completely sure why you don't want to use reverb for this (with a bit of time and effort, it won't sound like reverb at all), but if you have access to a unit with separate control of early reflections, this should roughly simulate stereo micing, without those phase problems. Of course, you'd be surprised just how effective simply offsetting the vocal a couple of dB either way can be.
__________________
Don't eat that.
post78 is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
mono or stereo reverb for lead vocal? SyncSailor So much gear, so little time! 4 9th April 2008 09:48 PM
SRS BAP-02, MW-02 Stereo Imager poncival High end 2 1st January 2007 11:21 PM
Ribbons on lead Vocals J-Deb So much gear, so little time! 7 11th December 2006 08:43 AM
Help needed for lead vocal recording Max headroom So much gear, so little time! 5 11th November 2004 01:14 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:13 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.