CLA Vocal Compression - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


CLA Vocal Compression

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 3rd July 2005   #1
Gear addict
 
msrecprod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 475

Thread Starter
CLA Vocal Compression

I was listening to the first Blindside record and the Autopiolit Off record. On both records the vocals sound exactly the same sounding (compression and EFX wise). This is not the case with all of his records that I listen to. The thing I notice most about it is the compression. At some points I can even hear the pop of the compressor working. This sound is something I only hear in his mixs. I'm wondering if anyone has an idea of the compressor used on his vocals also what EFX stuff is he running on the vocals.
msrecprod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2005   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 771

1176
Winey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2005   #3
Gear addict
 
msrecprod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 475

Thread Starter
Winey, I agree that most of his mixes sound like the vocals could be an 1176, but on the two albums I mentioned, I think there is something else going on. Not sure though. Mybe I just havn't used an 1176 in the way that he's using it. Any ideas on the settings?
msrecprod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd July 2005   #4
Gear addict
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Santa Barbara
Posts: 497

the couple times i've been in there he uses a pegged 1176 on vox...his brother i've seen use that vac rack thing too.
bpatural is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #5
Lives for gear
 
robmix's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,559

1176 everyday of the week. On some country vox he used to use a 2254 sometimes followed by the 1176 but that became very rare.
robmix is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #6
Gear addict
 
msrecprod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 475

Thread Starter
Does anyone know how it was set, or how he was hitting it to get that clear in your face vocal.
msrecprod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #7
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,287

i have no idea how he does it, but the best way (ime) to get a really clear vocal that's all upfront, all the time, is to do a boatload of fader rides. i'm a huge fan of squashing a vocal to near lifelessness, then using the fade to restore motion and dynamics exactly where i want them. call me old fashioned, i like the la2a for smooth bigness, and the 1176 for hypey bigness. i also eq and de-ess before compression, no sense making the compressor pump on freqs i don't want to hear anyway.

and if you want the vocal to pop, draw a little sawtooth waveform on your daw's automation at the beginning of a word. assuming you have the all powerful mouse, use it!


gregoire
del ubik
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #8
84K
Lives for gear
 
84K's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: right coast
Posts: 3,857

Quote:
Originally Posted by u b i k
i have no idea how he does it, but the best way (ime) to get a really clear vocal that's all upfront, all the time, is to do a boatload of fader rides. i'm a huge fan of squashing a vocal to near lifelessness, then using the fade to restore motion and dynamics exactly where i want them. call me old fashioned, i like the la2a for smooth bigness, and the 1176 for hypey bigness. i also eq and de-ess before compression, no sense making the compressor pump on freqs i don't want to hear anyway.

and if you want the vocal to pop, draw a little sawtooth waveform on your daw's automation at the beginning of a word. assuming you have the all powerful mouse, use it!


gregoire
del ubik

Having an Atomic Squeezebox around would probably save you a lot of time in your mixing.... the box does the fader rides. It is truly amazing.... feels weird when you first hear it... big wow factor.
84K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #9
Gear addict
 
msrecprod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 475

Thread Starter
That sound's like what I kinda do. The biggest problem that I run into is that the lowend of the vocal get's pushed way up on the tails of phrases. I can ride the vocal down, but the exagerated low end is still there. That's why I was wondering about the CLA compression, because he gets it in your face without all the bad artifacts that I'm experiencing.
msrecprod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #10
Gear addict
 
msrecprod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 475

Thread Starter
Does anyone know what eq is going on the vocals to smooth it out? Thinking about it now different eqs would make a huge difference in how the compressor acts. Also after some searching I found some info that The Thrill Factor had posted about Vak Rac compressors on Lord Alge's vocals. Can anyone comment on this?
msrecprod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #11
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177

Quote:
Originally Posted by msrecprod
That sound's like what I kinda do. The biggest problem that I run into is that the lowend of the vocal get's pushed way up on the tails of phrases. I can ride the vocal down, but the exagerated low end is still there. That's why I was wondering about the CLA compression, because he gets it in your face without all the bad artifacts that I'm experiencing.
EQ going into the comp.

That's what i do 99% of the time when mixing leads.

The crucial aspect of a lead are the mid frequencies.

Certain singers move up and down the mid ranges so making a compressor more freq dependent makes it stay out of the problem consonants.

The only time i do the reverse is when i am using the comp for coloration.

Also for the in your face sound a compressor chain is needed(2 compressors in series) with an EQ before an after.

Lastly splitting parts on 2 faders is needed for certain sections.
thethrillfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #12
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177

Quote:
Originally Posted by msrecprod
Does anyone know what eq is going on the vocals to smooth it out? Thinking about it now different eqs would make a huge difference in how the compressor acts.
Read above.



Quote:
Originally Posted by msrecprod
Also after some searching I found some info that The Thrill Factor had posted about Vak Rac compressors on Lord Alge's vocals. Can anyone comment on this?
The Vac Rac on stun has a certain sound.

It tends to make the vocals bright but not with alot of artifacts.

I prefer it on a vocal that needs less coloration and has been tracked correctly.
thethrillfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #13
Gear Guru
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 11,287

Quote:
Originally Posted by 84K
Having an Atomic Squeezebox around would probably save you a lot of time in your mixing.... the box does the fader rides. It is truly amazing.... feels weird when you first hear it... big wow factor.

you there! with your evil, expensive gear taunts! away i tell you!!

any chance that, in spite of its amazingness, it sounds like @ss? because then i wouldn't have to buy it.

now tell me the truth, but feel free to show mercy thru the judicious use of lies.


gregoire
del ubik
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #14
Gear addict
 
msrecprod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 475

Thread Starter
Thrill, what types of eq would you use before and after compression? Is there something that you have found as a starting point?
msrecprod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th July 2005   #15
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177

Quote:
Originally Posted by msrecprod
Thrill, what types of eq would you use before and after compression? Is there something that you have found as a starting point?

Massive Passive or a Neve in overdrive.

After i like a GML or SSL EQ.
thethrillfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2005   #16
Gear addict
 
msrecprod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 475

Thread Starter
Thrill, what Neve do you feel best suits the vocal in overdrive and in other situatons. I guess my question is really, do you prefer the 1073 or the 1081?
msrecprod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2005   #17
Lives for gear
 
audioez's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 627

Quote:
Originally Posted by msrecprod
Thrill, what Neve do you feel best suits the vocal in overdrive and in other situatons. I guess my question is really, do you prefer the 1073 or the 1081?
I know you're asking Mr. Thrill, but any neve product pre 1980 is gonna take your engineering experience to the next level, it's scarry!!
__________________
audioez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2005   #18
Gear addict
 
EngineEars's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: LA
Posts: 460

Quote:
Originally Posted by audioez
I know you're asking Mr. Thrill, but any neve product pre 1980 is gonna take your engineering experience to the next level, it's scarry!!
You mean the number at the end of a Neve module isn't the year it was made?
EngineEars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2005   #19
Lives for gear
 
Fibes's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Hell
Posts: 545

12 to 1-- attack 5-7 release 5-7.

Kill it. to hell with stun

12-1 is the magic 1176 curve. Now the magicians guild will have me killed for releasing that inf

Goodnight.
__________________
Fibes

"you can like it, or not like it."
Fibes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2005   #20
Lives for gear
 
max cooper's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: tx
Posts: 8,802

Quote:
Originally Posted by EngineEars
You mean the number at the end of a Neve module isn't the year it was made?
Only in the case of the 33609.
max cooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2005   #21
Lives for gear
 
audioez's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Location: New York City
Posts: 627

Quote:
Originally Posted by max cooper
Only in the case of the 33609.
Very much so, I'm partying like it's
audioez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2005   #22
Gear Guru
 
thethrillfactor's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177

Quote:
Originally Posted by msrecprod
Thrill, what Neve do you feel best suits the vocal in overdrive and in other situatons. I guess my question is really, do you prefer the 1073 or the 1081?

I was talking about the 1073.

Patching the tape return straight into the mic pre instead of the line input.

And i disagree on the pre 1080 thing since the 1066 has a 10k hi instead of the 12K on the 1073.

This makes a difference on vocals.

But less on drums.

I love the 1081.

Though i've used it more for vocals that need less of the Neve sound and more of as a corrective EQ.
thethrillfactor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 13th July 2005   #23
Gear addict
 
msrecprod's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 475

Thread Starter
Thrill, you got me thinking now. I have a pair of 2254's and I think I'll try eqing into them and using the make up gain to get some distortion. Are there any ratio or other settings you guys like to the 2254's. I've tracked a lot of vocals through them (really like the 4:1), but mixing I'm usually using them somewere else. I'll have to give it a try.
msrecprod is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th July 2005   #24
Gear addict
 
Prickstein's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Posts: 465

Quote:
Originally Posted by robmix
1176 everyday of the week
Series or Parallel?
Prickstein is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th August 2008   #25
Gear nut
 
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 75

Send a message via AIM to JChap
If anyone still cares:

"EQ: How much are you compressing and automating the vocals?
CLA: Oh, we’re hitting them with a baseball bat like three or four times over. I’m not using the compression to save myself from having to ride the fader; I’m trying to put some character into it. I want it to sound like it was recorded on a 16 track, with a Fairchild, hitting the tape nice and hard, adding all of that color and character into it — making that in your face sound"
JChap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th August 2008   #26
Gear addict
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 357

If I'm not mistaken, I think he uses the Purple Audio 1176. At least he did at one time.

I have to agree on the eq before compression. My chain is typically an 1176 on the channel insert of my SSL and the insert is 'In' but not 'Pre'. This means the insert is not pre-eq. I'll experiment with dipping a little low mid out, around 400 depending upon the proximity effect of how the vocal was recorded. Then, I'll look for frequencies in the midrange around 1k to dip and just listen to the sound. There is no one magic formula since every singers timbre is different. Subtle eq moves can have drastic effects as to how well a vocal can sit it the track. I'll usually put a Pultec after the compressor to add a bit of top around 10k. Interesting to watch your compressor meter while turning this SSL eq on and off. You'll soon realize that these mid frequencies are really what's driving your compressor.
Louderock is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th August 2008   #27
Gear maniac
 
Lord Fear's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 269

He just mixed a record for me. He was using the retro 176 on the lead vocal. Slaming it fairly hard. The Dbl got a blue stripe and any bgv's were treated with vac rac's. as far as fx he has his two echo pro's that he uses for vocals/guitars. he also had a sde-3000?? roland delay for a slap. i didn't catch all the verbage but i know i saw a rev 7 on the lead vocal.
Lord Fear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th August 2008   #28
Lives for gear
 
gainreduction's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 2,377

In the SOS interview, which is about the track "the black parade", he says the first stop was Waves L1, done in the transfer from PT to the Sony machine. Then the bluestripe 1176 (which he says is wired all wrong inside) and then dbx263 de-esser.

For this particular track that is.
gainreduction is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th August 2008   #29
Lives for gear
 
wildpark's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Location: GERMANY:FRANKFURT-WIESBADEN
Posts: 1,475

if money isnt the chase i take a gml 8900 for fader rides

Quote:
Originally Posted by 84K View Post
Having an Atomic Squeezebox around would probably save you a lot of time in your mixing.... the box does the fader rides. It is truly amazing.... feels weird when you first hear it... big wow factor.
wildpark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th August 2008   #30
84K
Lives for gear
 
84K's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: right coast
Posts: 3,857

Quote:
Originally Posted by wildpark View Post
if money isnt the chase i take a gml 8900 for fader rides
I had the GML.... sold it, kept the Squeezebox and bought a second. Not even close, YMMV
84K is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Best software Plug in(Au) for vocal compression ? insect1 Music computers 1 16th August 2006 09:18 AM
Vocal Compression Ectobeats Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 11 13th February 2006 11:26 PM
For vocal compression -Tracking or Mixing? blue_scorpion High end 12 31st January 2006 09:40 PM
vocal rides and compression beatzz Music computers 8 20th August 2005 03:40 PM
Vocal compression on mixdown - what do you do? waterside So much gear, so little time! 7 21st June 2005 11:32 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:08 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.