![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2004 Location: The Twilight Zone
Posts: 195
Thread Starter | Track Count at Higher Sample Rates
This question has 2 parts. The first is: What sample rates are you using for complete album projects with high track counts? The second is: If you are sampling at 96 or higher - how are you managing your tracks? Are you recording to only 1 drive (firewire) or spanning across multiple drives? We are in the middle of recording an album at 96/24 and are running into problems. There are upwards of 30 tracks on many songs and the drives are having a hard time keeping up. Even the Glyph drives. We are using external firewire drives (both Glyph and LaCie) If I change my disc allocation to span across drives then backup really becomes a bit of work. Keeping all folders labeled, etc. How are you people handling this? How, specifically are you recording at 96/24 or 196/24? PS: We are PT HDIII/Acell Mac dual G5. Thanks... |
| | |
| | #2 | |
| Lives for gear |
I record at 96/24 with my HD2 Accel system. However, I use a WD 10K RPM SATA drive for tracking, then I save the session to a different WD10K SATA drive for mixing. I've recored over 30 (largest had about 48) tracks with zero problems. I'm using a PC, but I don't think that matters. Rob Quote:
__________________ www.carvelstudios.com "I like my women the way I like my scotch, 20 years old and mix up in coke." | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2004 Location: The Twilight Zone
Posts: 195
Thread Starter |
Thanks, Rob. Anyone else...? |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Jun 2004 Location: Chi-town, a BlueState
Posts: 215
|
This is a question near and dear to my heart. We are currently tracking at good old 44.1/16 (not very "high end" i know) but i would like to get up in the 96/24 range. Thing most projects we do fall into the spazcore sound and it's not uncommom to get into 200+ tracks. We track with a raid 0+1 SATA system and holds up 'most' of the time. jeffrey
__________________ www.callthecow.com GO! ---- IL HB 311 -- US HR 676 ----- universal single payer healthcare for all! |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recording at Higher Sample Rates | Rick Shepherd | Mastering forum | 6 | 26th November 2008 10:48 PM |
| Mixing to higher sample rate | Tom C | High end | 8 | 12th December 2005 02:55 AM |
| Higher sample rates -- better for time stretching later on? | CZ101 | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 17th February 2005 07:41 PM |
| Poll: 44.1 or higher sample rates for recording? | music | Q&A with Charles Dye | 2 | 22nd May 2004 08:08 PM |
| Recording important tracks at higher sample rates | Heterodox | High end | 15 | 17th July 2003 05:27 PM |
| |