Grand Piano or Virtual Piano?? Who Has Both??? - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


Grand Piano or Virtual Piano?? Who Has Both???

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th August 2008   #31
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 28

Best in sampled grand piano at the moment : http://www.soundsonline.com/EastWest...pr-EW-171.html
puuluu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th August 2008   #32
Gear maniac
 
gpiccolini's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Location: Madrid
Posts: 198

...if you´re a half decent player it can`t be compared by any means... even a half decent vertical can blow the best samples out of the water IMHO.


...and for the friend that theorizes about a recorded piano becoming a sampled piano... well: I bet you´re not a piano player to say the least . Nice trying, but still I hold my opinion.
gpiccolini is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2008   #33
AB3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 3,620

i respectfully disagree. There is no way that the Garritan Steinway does not sound better than a mediocre upright piano.





Quote:
Originally Posted by gpiccolini View Post
...if you´re a half decent player it can`t be compared by any means... even a half decent vertical can blow the best samples out of the water IMHO.


...and for the friend that theorizes about a recorded piano becoming a sampled piano... well: I bet you´re not a piano player to say the least . Nice trying, but still I hold my opinion.
AB3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2008   #34
Gear addict
 
philosi's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 306

We have an early 80's Yamaha C3 and it records wonderfully. Comparing a virtual to a real piano is kinda crazy. Just as crazy as a classical guitar patch to a real nylon string guitar.

A piano is a musical instrument.
philosi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2008   #35
Lives for gear
 
elambo's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: Up here
Posts: 6,181

Quote:
Originally Posted by gpiccolini View Post
...if you´re a half decent player it can`t be compared by any means... even a half decent vertical can blow the best samples out of the water IMHO.
I strongly agree with the first half, and in my experience it's entirely true, and true every time. The complexity of a performance on a real piano isn't possible with samples. Play a single note on a piano and a single note with Ivory and they will sound very close. It stops there.

I'm not sure about the second half. I've never recorded an upright.
elambo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2008   #36
Lives for gear
 
theother's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: London, UK
Posts: 2,089

I just did a couple of tests again to see if my upright (Pleyel) could be replaced by samples.

I have almost all the sample pianos. EWQL Pianos, Ivory, Vienna Imperial, etc.

They all suck even compared to my upright piano.

They sound dead, boring and lifeless. I knew within 10 sec I don´t like it. I bought a Roland RD700GX weighted keyboard just to play the sampled pianos. It helps to improve the playing but not the tone.

I use old small condenser tube Neumann´s for the upright and the tone is nothing short of amazing I get out of it. Sounds almost like a grand.
__________________
----------------------------------------
The Bhan Tugh Revelations
www.bhantugh.com
theother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th August 2008   #37
Lives for gear
 
jjblair's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 1,475

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dirty Halo View Post
Hey, I too admire the art of a true grand piano. Hell, any piano. The wood, the the feel, the soundboard and all the interactions that produces...

BUT, GIVE ME A BREAK GUYS! I bet you almost ANYTHING the lot of you could not reliably tell the difference in a blind test mix.

A solo piece is another matter (even then, some will be fooled).

-a

The problem I find with sampled piano, and I always hear it, is the lack of correct sympathetic string vibration. Nobody plays without the pedal engaged, and when the felts are off the strings, every combination of notes is going to have a different sympathetic tone to it, that they could not possibly recreate with our current hardware.

My best friend has all sample libraries for movie scoring. He has Ivory in all that, and I can hear the difference when he plays me a mock up score.

But most importantly, no midi controller really feels the same as a piano. I mean, if you are doing piano based stuff, and you are a really good piano player, you want to play a real piano. It's like a Hammond. You can do something that kinda sounds like it, but you ned the interaction of the real thing, if you are a real Hammond player.

The other drawback to not having a real piano is now you are limited to how somebody else thinks the thing should be mic'd, or how it should sound. Depending on the material, I'll use different mic combinations, or different mic techniques, that best suit the track. I played with the Ivory demo at NAMM, and it just didn't give me the options that I would want.

BTW, to whoever was going to buy the C7, make sure you buy one made after the mid '90s with the wider body. You would not believe how much better than sound than the narrower ones. When I bought mine, it was side by side with a narrower one, and you could hear the $10k difference between the two. Wasn't even close.
__________________
"Eventually your experience catches up with your opinion." - David Palmer
jjblair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2010   #38
Gear Head
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 67

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjblair View Post

But most importantly, no midi controller really feels the same as a piano. I mean, if you are doing piano based stuff, and you are a really good piano player, you want to play a real piano.
Exactly! Even if the software could be made to sound similar to the real thing, the *pianist* will always sound better on the real thing, because it will inspire the player do things that the fake wouldn't. And how many gigabytes would it take to have just different mic and mic placement options on the software, not to mention things like bleed from drums :-)
__________________
Tapani Rauha
www.poprockjazz.com
trauha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2010   #39
Lives for gear
 
RKrizman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,598

I have both. If I'm scoring a cue for a soap opera I use Ivory. If I'm tracking an original song I use the C7.

-R
RKrizman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2010   #40
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,367

The Garritan Steinway sample recordings sound fairly good.

This may be as good as it gets for sampled pianos. WHY?:

Well....
1) Midi only has 127 levels of volume. Most if not all keyboards really can not even offer the player even THAT level of control and accuracy over notes.

2) HOW you strike the note (quick or slow) has a profound difference on the sound. This is something that the physical keyboards do not even have the ability to do. Perhaps someday - but the tool up and testing would be at great cost.

3) Every time you lift the pedal you get a "bloom" - sympathetic vibrations of the strings. This is only starting to be models and on a fairly unrefined level. Again, the tool up and testing would be at great cost.

So enjoy! A real piano will be out of range for computer emulation for some time ---- at least until keyboards are significantly improved (laser technology?) and MIDI spec are greatly increased in resolution.

Besides - a real piano is just so amazing - no speakers, no electricity.
piano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2010   #41
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,367

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fletcher View Post
We have a 5' "Hardman" from the 40's... I've heard no software that even begins to compare to the real thing.

As always, YMMV.

Peace.
Perhaps because that dinky 5' Hardman sounded like crap - emulation software just can't sound that bad. Ya, you bet your ass YMMV on that one.

Joshin ya there Fletcher.
piano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th June 2010   #42
Lives for gear
 
Melgueil's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Location: Montpellier, France
Posts: 784

Not even close. Had been using Ivory in the Studio for a while. Went to the local piano store (a real one). Sat down at a 50,000 euro Steinway (a real one).

Brought me right back to reality. To me for solo and or jazz duo etc, it's night and day - in particular from the performer's perspective. Sampled piano -buried in a mix, yeah, maybe, but it doesn't substitute for the real thing.

Cdlt
Melgueil is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2010   #43
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: CT
Posts: 585

Most things we do today (samples, editing, etc) is because it's easier not better. Simplicity and ease wins most times.

You can go to Home Depot and buy synthetic crown molding for your living room and it's easy, cheap, and quick. Go to a well maintained old house and look closely at the molding. No comparison, but that took time.

I'm not saying synthetic is bad. Hell I use it. But I am not kidding myself into thinking it's better.
Johns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2010   #44
Gear nut
 
Crowdnoise's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2010
Location: Los Angeles/Silverlake
Posts: 118

I have a 1943 Steinway (New York). I also have pretty much every piano library under the sun.

It's funny, when we are doing mockups of a piece using the samples, we always find a way to convince ourselves that they are acceptable for the final. That is, until we finally hear a couple of bars on the real thing.

And yes, it's true that it's all in the hands (and feet). If I had to choose between a decent player on the grand or Randy Kerber on the samples, it would be tough, but I can't say I wouldn't choose the samples. Not saying I would either, but it would be a fight.
__________________
IMDB Credits - Expanded Credits
--
Crowdnoise is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2010   #45
Lives for gear
 
DONNX's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 5,351

I haven't come across anything that beats the real thing. Piano or cowbell. I accept emulations/samples as emulations/samples. And use them accordingly.
__________________
DN


DONNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2010   #46
Lives for gear
 
syra's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Location: L.A.
Posts: 2,122

For me the biggest difference is resonance. It brings the instrument alive and its something I have yet to hear from a sample no matter how good it is.
syra is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th June 2010   #47
Gear addict
 
StudioKing's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2005
Location: Not sure
Posts: 408

I always track with a grand piano at other studios, if I had the chance to get my own grand at my studio I would happily put all my sampled piano sounds in the trash and never think about them again.
StudioKing is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
How to recording grand piano imjuno Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 2 16th June 2008 06:02 PM
Using a Grand Piano as a reverb Surfkat So much gear, so little time! 12 7th March 2008 04:23 PM
motif xs concert grand piano vs piano software and hooking it up ayp Music computers 5 21st August 2007 08:34 PM
When you actually would like to have a grand piano Ruphus So much gear, so little time! 23 19th May 2003 01:16 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:23 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.