![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 17
Thread Starter | This has been a debate between myself certain gear manufacturers and retailers... Is it safe to assume that, under perfect conditions (balanced power, no radio interference, etc.) a unit can live up to it's published specs for noise and dynamics? Example: If I grab a Mytek A/D rack, can I punch "Record", analyze the output, and really, REALLY just see the little bar floating care-free right around the -120dB mark? Assuming there is a device connected that has a SNR of at MOST -120dB? Curious... Anyone? ![]() |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Salzburg
Posts: 180
| !!!!!PUSH PUSH PUSH!!!!! !!!! ![]() ![]() ![]() !!!! !!!!Nearly 9 years later!!!! |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 346
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear | I know how you feel...... I was wondering the same thing. After I bought my Apogee AD16-x, I was wondering why my levels from my Lynx inteface mixer were all hovering around -80 with my preamps connected, and even for channels where nothing was connected, I never saw levels dip down to -120 where I figured they'd be since the specs on the AD16-x give it a 120 db signal to noise ratio. Apparently there is noise in the sub and supersonic range that causes this.. I've heard of this with the Echo Audiofire line as well, where this noise is seen on the meters but is imperceptible to the ear... |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 2,874
| You do know that the OP is from 9 years ago don't you? But regardless, and assuming that equipment has been connected up correctly etc. you're not always going to achieve performance that matches the published specs simply because sometimes published specs are produced by measuring under unrealistic conditions ... So yeah, re. the OP - if the published specs are realistic and accurately measured, then it's not unreasonable to expect to be able to reproduce them. if |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: SW France
Posts: 250
| Please don't tell me you're using the meters in Pro Tools for this snipe hunt... ![]() |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Oxfordshire
Posts: 2,874
| lol |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear | Ok...OK.... you got me !!! 9 years later !!! OMG !!!!! But the problem still exists !!! The meters are showing noise, that I can't hear !!!!!!!!!!!!!! hahhahahaha |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 3,397
| Username: Mercuri Last Activity: 27th May 2003 11:19 PM ![]() Anyway, if you want to test your converters, just do a loopback - connect the output of one channel to the input of another with a short cable and record without any music going out. You can analyze the noise floor of the resulting 'silent' track to your heart's content. You can also use RMAA to do the analysis for you. In my experience, the noise floor specs are usually about 5-6 dB higher than what manufacturers claim. |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Crest and Dynamic Range Confusion | dougfatheruk | Mastering forum | 3 | 5th February 2011 05:27 PM |
| Satriani and dynamic range | rhizomeman | Mastering forum | 31 | 4th July 2010 08:18 AM |
| vocals and dynamic range | stellar | So much gear, so little time! | 12 | 4th March 2010 02:25 AM |
| Dynamic Range and Headroom relatinship ready for Mastering / Question | zak7 | Mastering forum | 3 | 24th October 2008 05:41 PM |
| Relative loudness and the destruction of dynamic range | AUDIOSFX | Q&A with Charles Dye | 19 | 12th April 2004 04:13 PM |
| |