hi-end a/c pwr cords ABX blind test results - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


hi-end a/c pwr cords ABX blind test results

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 15th December 2004   #1
Lives for gear
 
Fleaman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Silverlake
Posts: 4,074

Thread Starter
hi-end a/c pwr cords ABX blind test results

the test

Blind ABX testing on hi end a/c power cords! I doubt this will change the minds of the faithful (those faithful to the hi-end a/c cords), but this is a pretty thorough test and this site happens to be one of the best, least biased out there...even though they are a consumer audio/video site.



Fleaman
Fleaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th December 2004   #2
Lives for gear
 
dave-G's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Florida
Posts: 2,486

Send a message via AIM to dave-G Send a message via Skype™ to dave-G
"Using the blind ABX protocol, we failed to hear any differences between an assortment of generic power cords and Nordost Valhalla. Therefore, we cannot conclude that different power cords produce a difference using the blind ABX protocol. However, we also cannot conclude that there are no differences. We simply failed to prove that differences can be detected to a statistically significant degree using a blind ABX protocol."



dave-G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #3
Lives for gear
 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462

Hey ! This is allready starting to get one sided here.

WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! http://www.gearslutz.com/board/showt...ght=a.c+cables
__________________
- Kev
kevinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #4
Lives for gear
 
picksail's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Location: Hollywood
Posts: 3,632

This one's for you dj!!!!!
picksail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #5
Gear Head
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 46

What piece of equipment would you be speaking of?

Power amp?
Board supplies?
??

??

Where would one care to employ a high end cord..if at all?
__________________
Bill Roberts Precision Mastering
Level is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #6
Lives for gear
 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462

Quote:
Originally posted by Level
What piece of equipment would you be speaking of?

Power amp?
Board supplies?
??

??

Where would one care to employ a high end cord..if at all?

All that and more level !

http://www.gearslutz.com/board/showt...ght=a.c+cables<------(shameless A.C. cable thread fan club plug)
kevinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #7
Gear maniac
 
rockstar's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: berlin/germany
Posts: 172

i believe if you connect your equipment with wires thin as a hair there probably would be loss in audioquality if the capacitors or voltage stabilisation of the power supply in your gear is build too flimsy.

but in all other cases dfegad "high end power cables" ----> brainless amentia
rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #8
Lives for gear
 
Fleaman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Silverlake
Posts: 4,074

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally posted by djui5

To be honest this test is bunk...so the deliberations must continue.
Why? Or more importantly, what kind of test would be de-bunkable?

Like I mentioned, to some of the faithful, nothing, no kind of test, no kind of result, even if they were one of the testers in a double blind test, could convince them there wasn't something worth the $$$ to spend on such a cable. It would be like trying to convince a born again there is no god or a atheist there is.

It's true that there wasn't instant switching between cables and therefore the time lag became a factor. But hey, those out there claiming noticeable differences didn't have the capability of quick switch either.



Fleaman
Fleaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #9
Gear maniac
 
rockstar's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: berlin/germany
Posts: 172

Quote:
Originally posted by Fleaman
But hey, those out there claiming noticeable differences didn't have the capability of quick switch either.
so isn´t this test silly?

BTW do you believe in sound quality enhancement by power cords?
rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #10
Lives for gear
 
Fleaman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Silverlake
Posts: 4,074

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally posted by rockstar
so isn´t this test silly?

BTW do you believe in sound quality enhancement by power cords?
Not if the generic pwr cord is of the proper gauge.

And as far as the test being silly, well, I'd submit that $2,500+ pwr cords are silly, even $100 pwr cords. I'd rather spend the $100 on a good line conditioner.

If people weren't paying hundreds and thousands on pwr cords (I guess they must be?), then it would of never got to the point of having such a silly test.



Fleaman
Fleaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #11
Gear maniac
 
rockstar's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: berlin/germany
Posts: 172

Quote:
Originally posted by Fleaman
I'd rather spend the $100 on a good line conditioner.

me too!!!
rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #12
Lives for gear
 
James Lehmann's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,428

Run for the hills folks!
James Lehmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #13
Lives for gear
 
Fleaman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Silverlake
Posts: 4,074

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally posted by djui5
It's the length of time between samples, everyone in the same room, most of them not in the sweet spot, unfavorable listening conditions, etc etc etc..
Again, all those that I have read were claiming improvements with hi-end a/c cords were not switching between cords quickly either, if anything, in this a/b/x test they reduced the time between cords greatly, a lot shorter than say 'dot's cord switch time period.

If you were in the studio by yourself, how long would it take you to get out of your sweet spot, pwr off, change cords, pwr on, go back to sweet spot, etc.?

My point being is that if this a/b/x/ test is bunk to you, then you would also have to consider a single persons cord tryout bunk too.

At least I would. But hey, I'm not that faithful of a guy, I lean to the science end of things.



Fleaman
Fleaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #14
Lives for gear
 
RKrizman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Monica, CA
Posts: 6,598

Quote:
Originally posted by Fleaman

If you were in the studio by yourself, how long would it take you to get out of your sweet spot, pwr off, change cords, pwr on, go back to sweet spot, etc.?
Record the results.

-R
RKrizman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #15
Lives for gear
 
Fleaman's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Los Angeles, Silverlake
Posts: 4,074

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally posted by RKrizman
Record the results.

-R
Or that!

I suppose there is no reason that if pwr cords had an effect on amps/pwr'd speakers, that they shouldn't have an effect on consoles, rack equip, recorders, etc.

Yeah, record the differences!



Fleaman
Fleaman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #16
Lives for gear
 
toledo3's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304

Does a designer of gear... say a Rupert Neve, a Dave Derr, Dave Hill, etc., design his gear using a "high end" power cord, and then go....

"You know, I am going to use this inferior cord when I sell my products"?

Or is it more likely that the piece of gear was designed and "voiced" to work within the specs that the power cable they provide gives?

And what type of wire comes from your breaker box, to the plug? Could using a "high end" cable for the last 3 feet make a difference?

I think not.

Of course, if I was getting a bunch of free gear, or had the offer of getting paid to come online and tout somebody's power cords, it would be a hard decision.

If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck....

I don't lose respect for those that wear their affiliations on their sleeve, but those who defy all logic to "endorse" products strike me as suspicious. There is a big difference between a "gear pimp", and a "gear wh0re".

I'm still waiting for the AC Cable Listening Sessions... where do I send the money?
toledo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #17
Gear Guru
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 14,156

Quote:
Originally posted by toledo3
And what type of wire comes from your breaker box, to the plug? Could using a "high end" cable for the last 3 feet make a difference?

I think not.
And how did the power get from the generater to that breaker box? Again, hard to imagine what difference that last 3 feet could make.
PRobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #18
Lives for gear
 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462

You could.....

1. Get 2 dangerous 2 busses.

2. Set one up with a Requisite cable and one with a Radio Shack cheap as possible cable.

3. Send an identical mix through both 2 busses from the same source with the same converters.

4. Send the 2 mixes to a mastering console or some other box that you can A/B things quickly with a button.

5. Ban me from this forum for again contributing to an AC cable thread in a serious manner.

If theres any "blooming" going on from the good cable it should make the Dangerous 2 Buss "come alive" while the bad energy coming from the from the "Shack" 2 buss should sound inferior.

WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT ! WE WANT DOT !
kevinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #19
Lives for gear
 
toledo3's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304

kevC,

That only works if you place your gear on top of those little stone cones, to isolate bad vibrations. If you don't do that, it negates the quantum benefits of the flux capacitor.
toledo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #20
Gear maniac
 
rockstar's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: berlin/germany
Posts: 172

Quote:
Originally posted by toledo3
kevC,

That only works if you place your gear on top of those little stone cones,
i thought they are made from a mixture of copper and amethyst melt together at 0:05 am on a full moon night
rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #21
Gear Guru
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Location: NYC
Posts: 14,156

Quote:
Originally posted by rockstar
i thought they are made from a mixture of copper and amethyst melt together at 0:05 am on a full moon night
True. But they only work if the tin foil on your head is genuine Reynolds Wrap!!!!!
PRobb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #22
Lives for gear
 
James Lehmann's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,428

Quote:
Originally posted by toledo3
kevC,

That only works if you place your gear on top of those little stone cones, to isolate bad vibrations. If you don't do that, it negates the quantum benefits of the flux capacitor.
And more important still is to polarise your water supply as H2O polarity variations in the pipe flow in your walls can be detrimental to certain types of sensitive audio equipment.
__________________
James Lehmann
Voice-Over Artist - Project Studio Jockey
www.jameslehmann.net

· Use your real name - keep Gearslutz authoritative, accountable and courteous.
· Stop the superlatives madness - just say no to gear threads with the word 'best' in the title.
· Words or WAVs? The former are interesting, the latter are convincing.
James Lehmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #23
Lives for gear
 
toledo3's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304

Quote:
Originally posted by James Lehmann
And more important still is to polarise your water supply as H2O polarity variations in the flow in the pipes in your walls can be detrimental to certain types of sensitive audio equipment.
Yeah, that is the only way to get the full quality sound out of your Studio Projects microphone setup.
toledo3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #24
Gear maniac
 
rockstar's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Location: berlin/germany
Posts: 172

Quote:
Originally posted by James Lehmann
And more important still is to polarise your water supply as H2O polarity variations in the pipe flow in your walls can be detrimental to certain types of sensitive audio equipment.
true. but you can install a vortex filter into high performance twisted pair water pipes to twirl the polarity. so no static polarity will occur any more and thus your audio eyuipment can´t be infected by evil interferences. it´s the same infamous princip as balanced audio wiring.

i´ve read a lot of test and all of the highest expirienced tester were amazed!
rockstar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #25
Lives for gear
 
kevinc's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462

I prefer the carbon fiber cones under my speakers for maximum lightweight stiffness.

Same for under the Dangerous 2 only those must be teflon coated so the bad energy just slides right off em`.
kevinc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #26
Lives for gear
 
hollywood_steve's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,242

If you don't do that, it negates the quantum benefits of the flux capacitor.

You will be receiving a bill from my local laundry. While I have spewed various liquids out my nose on prior occasions, this was the first time I managed to get dry bits of a cookie to come flying out. Curse you!

(as an explanation, I worked on several various BTTF tie-ins at Universal and since then, any use of the term "flux capacitor" causes instant loss of composure)
__________________
steve
Lexington 125 - High Resolution Location Recording

lex125@pacbell.net
http://www.lexington125.com
hollywood_steve is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #27
Lives for gear
 
Tim L's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Lawn Guy Land
Posts: 1,368

Quote:
Originally posted by Labs
... Price for 2 weeks sexholiday to thailand.
2000 dollar...
Hmmm... You seem to have more than a passing familiarity with the funds required to finance a Thai "sexholiday"....



.... oh, by the way.... who's your travel agent?
__________________
"Play ƒuckin' Loud!!!..." - Bob Dylan, May 17 1966
Tim L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #28
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,157

Quote:
.... who's your travel agent?
You don't need one. Just buy a ticket to Bangkok.
StoneinaPond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #29
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,325

So what are yawl saying, balanced power is crap !
Snatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th December 2004   #30
Lives for gear
 
James Lehmann's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Location: Europe
Posts: 2,428

Quote:
Originally posted by Snatchman
So what are yawl saying, balanced power is crap !
What we are saying is that if you were to spend $6000 sending your rack to Thailand, you would need 86,367,451^10 instances of $300 AC Power cables in order to hear the ambient sounds of a Bangkok 'Tea-House' from way out in Space with <0.000000000001 slew & distortion...

No, wait.. darn.. what was the question?
James Lehmann is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
blind mic test uploaded quincyg High end 20 26th April 2006 03:41 AM
Modeling/Real AMP Blind Test! Rush909 So much gear, so little time! 1 16th March 2006 07:34 PM
Here I go again - BLIND TEST of Lynn Fuston's MIC CD - this time!! Sqye High end 14 30th August 2005 04:59 PM
Cable test results.... djui5 High end 18 10th June 2004 11:00 PM
Double blind test software.... DanV So much gear, so little time! 0 8th March 2004 09:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:19 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.