Focal Twins - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end

Focal Twins
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th June 2008   #31
Lives for gear
 
Musiclab's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Location: Elmont NY
Posts: 6,951
My Recordings/Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitfiend View Post
venture what you like.

Real Traps are incredible, if it's in your budget, definitely get them! You also may want to look into diffusion as well.
I Have a very nice treated control room thank you, and I'm not slagging the barefoots, but I think the focals are excellent speakers, and I stand by what I said before, if you can't mix on them you can't mix
__________________
Lou Gimenez
www.musiclabnyc.com
Musiclab is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008   #32
Gear nut
 
Bitfiend's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 136

Quote:
Originally Posted by DSD_Mastering View Post
Because the Twins are that good! They beg to be compared to monitors twice or even three times their price.

Regards,
Bruce
Holy Shite, right, that's it for me lads. i'm going back to the pool........
__________________
...Steve McQueen IS Hip-Hop...
Bitfiend is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008   #33
Gear nut
 
Bitfiend's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 136

Quote:
Originally Posted by Musiclab View Post
I Have a very nice treated control room thank you, and I'm not slagging the barefoots, but I think the focals are excellent speakers, and I stand by what I said before, if you can't mix on them you can't mix
damn, guess i can't mix then......oh well, guess i'll have to go back to underwaterbasketweaving.......sigh...
Bitfiend is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008   #34
Pragmatic Snob
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 12,005

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitfiend View Post
seriously you're proving my point.....the truest representation of the music with the highest transparency is what the 2 brands i mentioned bring to the table NOT focals.

barefoots sound absolutely nothing like westlakes, which means they can't both be bringing 'highest transparency'.

to my ears, barefoots have a definite sound, and it involves a big old bump at 40hz, some scoop around 800, and a little shine at 12k. focals got their bumps and scoops too, every monitor i've ever used does.

i just spent an afternoon in a room with barefoots, twins, pelonis, griffins, dyns, mackies, and atc's, half of which i already had experience with. listened with 6 other engineers, 2 acousticians, and a speaker designer, switching with a calibrated dangerous switcher.

all agreed: no such thing as a truth box. each one gives you an angle; no angle is inherently superior, it has to jibe with the operator.

pick the angle that works for you, and get to work.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________

Clariphonic DSP On Sale Now!!

Kush Audio


......

Kush Audio: High End Just Got Higher
____________________
u b k is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008   #35
Gear nut
 
Bitfiend's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 136

Quote:
Originally Posted by u b k View Post
barefoots sound absolutely nothing like westlakes, which means they can't both be bringing 'highest transparency'.
where did i EVER say they "sound" alike????? and HELL YES they can both be more transparent than focals (wording on that doesn't sound right).
Quote:
Originally Posted by u b k View Post
i just spent an afternoon in a room with barefoots, twins, pelonis, griffins, dyns, mackies, and atc's, half of which i already had experience with. listened with 6 other engineers, 2 acousticians, and a speaker designer, switching with a calibrated dangerous switcher.
all agreed: no such thing as a truth box. each one gives you an angle; no angle is inherently superior, it has to jibe with the operator.
well, we'll have to agree to disagree then. Barefoots stand head and shoulders above what you've mentioned. we did the same thing with adams, focals, gen's, barefoots and k&h, and the barefoots tested the best and the focals the worst.
Bitfiend is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2008   #36
Pragmatic Snob
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Location: The Land of Sunshine
Posts: 12,005

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bitfiend View Post
where did i EVER say they "sound" alike?????

maybe i'm having a conceptual difficulty, but if two things are transparently recreating a source, they should sound roughly identical, i.e., they should sound like the source.

so if two monitors are giving me two sounds, they can't both be transparent; at least one has some coloration.

when you say "these tested best" and "these tested worse", i'm taking that to mean "we liked these best" and "we liked these least".


gregoire
del
ubk
.
u b k is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #37
Lives for gear
 
DJamesGoody's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Location: Woodstock, NY
Posts: 1,431

This is hilarious!!

Do you guys ever get any work done?

I mean that lovingly, of course
__________________
-------
D. James Goodwin

www.djamesgoodwin.com

**religion kills**

**Freedom, morality, and the human dignity of the individual consists precisely in this; that he does good not because he is forced to do so, but because he freely conceives it, wants it, and loves it.** - Mikhail Bakunin
DJamesGoody is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th June 2008   #38
Lives for gear
 
polybonk's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Location: Sydney Australia
Posts: 656

The Idea that one is objectively better than the other is crazy. It depends what your response the speaker is. A better sounding speaker may cause you to work in a way that doesn't suite what you are trying to achieve. A shitty sounding speaker may be just the ticket if you end up producing things that work well. With myself for example, I work really well with beryllium and not as well with silk dome tweeters. It really depends on what the speaker brings out in you.

For pure listening, well thats different then.

Ditch your Ipod with its ear buds and get a Lavry gold DA and a B&W nautilus!
polybonk is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Focal Solo vs. Twins Daedalus77 High end 60 21st January 2013 02:38 AM
focal twins - +4 or -10 ? destiny brandon So much gear, so little time! 62 20th April 2010 07:20 PM
Focal Twins vs. BM5A Seth High end 3 16th September 2007 02:02 AM
Focal Twins in NYC fretman So much gear, so little time! 8 13th July 2007 09:38 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:49 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.