![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Calibrating Monitoring Levels / Digital Clipping | over-man | So much gear, so little time! | 2 | 13th January 2007 05:22 AM |
| Who Makes a good Monitoring System? | hubercraft | Low End Theory | 2 | 9th December 2006 05:01 PM |
| Calibrating my monitor system | tobymusic | Mastering forum | 5 | 25th October 2006 03:47 PM |
| New personal monitoring system | Nutmeg II. | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 1st December 2004 02:26 PM |
| I it possible to use the Mobx on a TDM system for monitoring? | chumusic | High end | 3 | 26th October 2003 08:01 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sweden
Posts: 73
| Calibrating monitoring system Hi all I just got my Cranesong Avocet and I'm in the process of installing it, after some moving around and acoustic treatment I'm slowly getting my setup together. I deal mainly in post production (on a humble level) and audio production for radio/tv commercials and multimedia. My gear includes Genelec 8040, TC Gold Channel, Avalon 737, GT Glory Comp etc. My initial impression is that the Avocet unit is absolutely superb and the D/A is awesome. The manual has a great piece on installing a subwoofer (or several) into your stereo- or surround array, but it says nothing about basic calibration. I'm well aware that gainstaging during different parts of the recording process might differ and make this a moot point, BUT isn't the values (such as the zero) on the Avocet supposed to translate to a spl value - IF calibrated correctly? Several reviews comment on the repeatable settings of the stepped attenuator. I take it that that means that the gain needs to be properly calibrated for the repeatability to have a meaning, especially if it's something that should translate between different mastering suites and/or post houses. I appreciate that post prod and broadcasting have level regulations that are very strict compared to music production, which is a somewhat different animal. Does anyone have some info on this ? Beg your pardon if this isn't High End enough to ask here. Kristian Last edited by K Bartos; 3rd March 2008 at 09:06 AM. Reason: typo |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,587
| Not sure if I understand the question but anyway... ![]() ![]() ![]() The only "standard" I know about is the K-14 which is a little in that direction but still something quite different. Read more about it in the mastering forum or on Bob Katz's digido.com The repeatability of the stepped atty is for your comfort in your own room, not between different rooms. Just make sure your levels going into the Avocet are healthy and get to work. Congrats on a great piece of gear.
__________________ "You always get more than you paid for at gearslutz" - Jules |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sweden
Posts: 73
| Gainreduction Thanks. Yeah I figured as much, suspected that was a bit on the geeky side ![]() I'll get to work then. /K |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 117
| DUC: UPDATED Room Calibration for Film and TV Post The above link has what you need for calibrating your speakers. I just went through the process recently to get our new Grace m906 calibrated. It works wonders when you're listening at the right level (dB-SPL). We do mainly post and commercial (TV and Radio) work here. I think going with the Dolby/AES/Grammy recommendations will serve you better than the K-14 system, but that's just my opinion. Happy reading! n |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Sweden
Posts: 73
| ndogg Awesome, that's a great resource - many thanks. /K |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |