Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 2nd December 2007, 07:00 PM   #1
justinmichael
Gear nut
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 146
Rosetta 800 96k vs. Rosetta 800 192k.

Rosetta 800 96k vs. Rosetta 800 192k.

Is there any sonic difference besides the higher sample rate?
justinmichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2007, 07:40 PM   #2
ocianic
Gear nut
 
ocianic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 144
FWIW.. I think most people feel on this board feel the topic of converters has been beaten to death. There's days of threads if you do a search.

You will hear different opinions.. My conclusion is that they are the same up to 96K.

Best thing is to read the info in the above search link and judge for yourself.

http://www.gearslutz.com/board/searc...archid=75366688

Personally, I still enjoy the discussion.

Good luck
__________________
http://aaronhendra.com
http://giverecords.com


  • Give Studios - Beverly Hills, CA
  • Neve 8068MKII w/ Flying faders, Custom 32-24-16 vintage API console
  • LA2A, STC-8, Chandler Zener TG12413
  • Prism ADA-8XR Converters..
ocianic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2007, 08:38 PM   #3
Glenn Bucci
Gear addict
 
Glenn Bucci's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PA
Posts: 463
Dan Lavry concluded that some additional distortion is actually added back in at 192. (This is what Bob Katz stated in his Mastering book on the chapter regarding sample rates.)
Glenn Bucci is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd December 2007, 10:28 PM   #4
nadumr
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Surf Avenue, NY
Posts: 232
I think he's asking if these particular products have different results at the same sampling rate (96k for instance) in order to inform himself of if it's worth investing in the newer product even if he won't use it at 192.
nadumr is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2007, 02:42 AM   #5
justinmichael
Gear nut
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 146
Quote:
Originally Posted by nadumr View Post
I think he's asking if these particular products have different results at the same sampling rate (96k for instance) in order to inform himself of if it's worth investing in the newer product even if he won't use it at 192.
exactly!

:)
justinmichael is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd December 2007, 02:48 AM   #6
nukmusic
Lives for gear
 
nukmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Dallas, TX / New Orleans, LA
Posts: 4,166
Send a message via AIM to nukmusic Send a message via Yahoo to nukmusic
Quote:
Originally Posted by justinmichael View Post
Rosetta 800 96k vs. Rosetta 800 192k.

Is there any sonic difference besides the higher sample rate?
not that I noticed. you can also check with Apogee.
__________________
.





Docta'J aka Big NUK
www.nukmusic.com
Practice Makes Progress
nukmusic is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:39 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0