![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| LA2A, 2-1176 or Distressor? Help me pick. | Sunshy | High end | 28 | 23rd January 2007 08:00 AM |
| best revisions for 1176, la2a/3a | aetucker1 | High end | 5 | 15th January 2007 06:45 PM |
| Using an 1176 & LA2A together for vocals? | bassmac | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 11th May 2005 04:55 PM |
| LA2A and 1176 bandwidth!! | FROGGY | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 11th September 2004 11:55 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 48
| Vocals: LA2A -> 1176 or 1176-> LA2A I've read threads where people will use these in conjunction to get a super squeezed vocal track. I was thinking of going through the 1176 FIRST to tone down the peaks and then through the LA2A to even everything out. I've read threads where people run the signal through the LA2A first and THEN the 1176. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me as the the LA2A's attack is so sloppy. What is the reasoning for doing this? Is it six of one, half dozen the other? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 16
| Though I don't have either of those "names" in my rack, I've found a Distressor (1176-ish, quick attack/release, 5-10 dB reduction) followed by my ADL (LA2A-ish opto, just a couple dB) works for me and makes more sense for the same reason you described. |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: Chicago
Posts: 1,459
| Re: Vocals: LA2A -> 1176 or 1176-> LA2A Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: London, UK
Posts: 1,825
| Compressors in series works a treat, once you get the hang of it. Just set the first one with the higest ratio and each successive compressor with a ratio lower than the previous one. adjust attack/release and threshhold to taste. Wiggy
__________________ If i see another 'Which neve clone is better thread... im seriously gona go postal!!!!!!!" |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 48
| I'm really behind on mixing a project this week. But next weel will try borh methods and post what I find. Thanks for the input guys. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: Nashville
Posts: 1,551
| It really depends on what you are going for. The common trick with those 2 for pop vocals is: LA-2A first. Set the meter to Gain Reduction, and it should be in "limit" mode. Adjust so the meter is just moving a little... not much. Then, into the 1176. Start with the knobs straight up. Adjust attack to slowest, and release to fastest. Use a ratio of either 4 or 8. Again, adjust so that you are just getting a little bit of needle movement. You will find this to be VERY smooth. I do a lot of rock... and I actually find that I like this combination.... but.... I get the needle going more on the LA-2A, and make the attack quicker on the 1176, and again... more compression (needle movement). Recently, I have been using the UAD-1 freaking Fairchild 670 compressor Plug-In in Nuendo... GEEZ!!!! It's sounds really amazing for squashing a rock vocal vintage style. It sounds amazingly like the real deal. Not quite the distressor... but very close!
__________________ Steve Lamm Cryptic Globe Recording Nashville Club Cubase/Nuendo Host Custom High End DAW Computers Location/Live Event Recording CGR Nashville Studios www.crypticglobe.com www.clubcubasenashville.com Amek Mozart RN - completely restored - FOR SALE |
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 1,650
| Quote:
I think I remember TLA saying that he slams an LA3A and grabs the slow attack overshoots with something fast like an SSL comp after the opto. I imagine either way will work fine. | |
| | |
| | #8 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 54
| Quote:
HmM I recently tried this one & it sounds kida wierd and PUMPY. probably because of the slow attack on the 1176, but still, It gets kinda smooth so could it be That ive done something wrong. Im really interested in different ways to combine these two monsters. | |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: upstate, sc
Posts: 1,450
| Quote:
Personally, I always prefer 1176 first at 4/8:1, med. fast attack/release into the LA2A on comp. Knocking a couple of dBs off on each unit. Sounds fairly natural but also somewhat 'finished' for lack of a better term and tends to sit really well in the mix. Whatever works for ya!
__________________ Sincerely, Casey SC Digital Services ![]() Bob Olhsson wrote on 17th September 2002, 12:56 PM: "Music is being used to sort consumers rather than to entertain people." | |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 54
| Damn i feel so stupid But i may have gotten this all wrong, but I thought 1 was the "fastest" and 7 " the slowest" But from what ive read about the 1176 it seems to be the other way around? |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: TN
Posts: 28
| wanna try something different? instead of slamming thru comps in series, split 'em out. mult the vocal to your LA-2A and 1176 separately. then maybe to some other stuff like something cheapo (alesis?) or your old dbx 160X or something. even pump another up with plugs (watch the phase). bring them up into separate faders on the desk and blend to taste. if you need to skim some peaks, buss the tracks together and run the buss thru a clean fast limiter. or print it back to your DAW and skim it there. experiment. mix controls on that final compressor might be fun too. FRS |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Guest
Posts: n/a
| Quote:
| |
|
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 946
| Quote:
__________________ C'mon! ![]() "No one will have to DO anything." Plug in's are for those who use plastic blow up dolls! --Jim Williams | |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |