![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #31 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 6,736
| Quote:
Tiled room and Rich Chamber are sweet things! Like the man says, makes you go 'Ah, there it is!'. Some of the chorus comes in handy on occasion too..... And the thing isn't really noisy in a problematic way, you just have to crank the output page to +12 and hey presto. The PCM 80 sounds classy (=read expensive) I guess, yet to me totally boring. Kinda Celine Dion......
__________________ what is a small difference? genetically there's only a small difference between a human and a banana. - golden beers | |
| | |
| | #32 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 306
|
In my experience there are two types of Lexicon reverbs. Great: PCM 42 PCM 70 224 480L And the other type: PCM 60 PCM 80 PCM 90 200 300 960 The other day I patched two PCM 42's into a pair of MXR auto flangers, and my partner walked in and said "oh, you made a Vortex" |
| | |
| | #33 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
I had the PCM70 for awhile and sold it. I thought it was cold, clangy, metallic. grainy. I much preferred the PCM90 or better yet Nuverbs. | |
| | |
| | #34 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 6,736
| Quote:
![]() Don't know how you figure it's cold though..... ![]() In agreeance with the 'two types of lexicon' theory above...! 480,224,PCM70,42..... | |
| | |
| | #35 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Dec 2006 Location: Cedar Falls, Iowa
Posts: 214
|
Nice, tight, rhythm gtr room from a PCM-60: Type: Room RT60: 1st button from left. Size: 2nd button from left. Contour: Bass Catamount Recording |
| | |
| | #36 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Central Point, Oregon
Posts: 1,451
| This is interesting because the PCM60 was touted as a preset version of the 224, and the 300 is supposed to be a single-engine 480L. Is the hardware radically different enough on these boxes to undo the magic and make this untrue?
|
| | |
| | #37 | |
| ValhallaDSP Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,713
| Quote:
Thanks, Sean Costello | |
| | |
| | #38 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2008 Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 962
| Just program the version 2 parameters into the user registers -- this will give you the best of both. If you have access to a version 2 unit, you can transfer via MIDI from one to the other -- this is described in the manual which is still available as a PDF from Lexicon.
|
| | |
| | #39 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2008 Location: Hamilton, Canada
Posts: 962
| I think this was done in another thread on the PCM70. If you can't find it, PM me.
|
| | |
| | #40 | |
| ValhallaDSP Joined: Feb 2009 Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,713
| Quote:
!)Program 4.2 0.0 Mix 100% Wet 0.1 Fx Adj +0 dB 0.2 Soft Knob 0 0.3 Size 8.5M 0.4 Gate Off 0.5 Pdelay 4ms 0.6 HC 10.0 kHz 0.7 Decay Opt On 0.8 Not Available 0.9 Tiled Room 1.0 RT Low .78S 1.1 RT Mid .62S 1.2 XOver 3.41 kHz 1.3 RT HC 9.02 kHz 1.4 RTL Stop .06S 1.5 RTM Stop .06S 2.0 Diffusion 35 2.1 Attack 0 2.2 Definition 51 3.0 LVL Mst 0 3.1 L1 Rfl -4.0dB 3.2 L2 Rfl off 3.3 L3 Rfl off 3.4 R1 Rfl -4.0dB 3.5 R2 Rfl off 3.6 R3 Rfl off 4.0 Dly Mst 0 4.1 L1 Rfl 1.27 mS 4.2 L2 Rfl 0.00 mS 4.3 L3 Rfl 0.00 mS 4.4 R1 Rfl 3.64 mS 4.5 R2 Rfl 0.00 mS 4.6 R3 Rfl 0.00 mS | |
| | |
| | #41 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 23
|
To refresh it, I can buy pcm 70 or pcm 80 but I've got LXP-15 II with software 2.0, there is also TILED ROOM program, is it same quality or just similiar or much worse to pcm 70 ?! I will be grateful for any info. By the way, LXP-15 II has got great prog called 2 Tap Detune which really killer for snare (with own mods) ... Thanks ! |
| | |
| | #42 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 1,338
|
PCM-70 = Noisy. -Ben B |
| | |
| | #43 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
Not true. "Tiled Room" is the only reason I've held onto my PCM-80. I use it on nearly every mix. Last edited by ray dsr; 16th July 2009 at 02:58 PM.. Reason: typo | |
| | |
| | #44 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304
| |
| | |
| | #45 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 23
|
Looks like there's a many Lexicon issues with Tiled Room program ... In this thread was written that PCM 70 has got more warm this program than PCM 80, which is more surgical. Anyone compare Tiled Room in PCM 70 and Tiled Room in LXP 15 II ?! Thanks ! |
| | |
| | #46 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2005 Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,304
| Quote:
i didn't, however, get the Audio Upgrade/Jim Williams mod on it. you may wanna entertain that possibility.
__________________ "You can imagine where it goes from here." "He fixes the cable?" | |
| | |
| | #47 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #48 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 23
|
Thanks a lot my friend for info ! I've got also KAWAI RV-5 and ENSONIQ DSP PRO. ENSONIQ is not for tracking , it changes sound a lot and KAWAI is clean and almost transparent. Thanks ! Maybe I will tempt for PCM 80. On ebay is PCM 70 now but with software 3.0. |
| | |
| | #49 |
| Gear addict |
The PCM70 sounds fantastic, and I have used them for literally everything, including guitar rigs. I find it is very realistic sounding, allows many options, and in general has a very classic sound to it. I bought mine used from a used studio out of LA. I had it worked on by Jim Fabiano for a better output (cleaner) and just a general inspection. I have a version 2. I believe it is 2.2. Anyway, it has tiled room and sounds wonderful. The biggest complaint about the PCM70 (if there really is any) is that the user interface is a bit of a disaster by today's standard. I have a block diagram of the unit on the wall so I can reference that, but it is true: compared to 'modern' newer units, it is not as easy to use. Though I personally think that is a crock of shit, because anyone who can hook up an advanced effects unit properly can read some basic instruction on how to navigate menus, but hey, thats just me...and of course, a lot of people feel anything <>V2 is worthless. This might be totally true, but since i have only used version 2s, I don't know about this... The only other complaint that a lot of people seem to have (wow, I am a ball of fun this morning, aren't I?) is that the input to the PCM70 is mono, i.e., one plug, and no stereo. Is this a big deal? Well that depends on what you want to do. If you use it as a aux effect this would be no problem, and it's actually cool because you can send one track to the unit and return with the left and the right, so as to 'make a track stereo' with the reverb. On the bad site, there is no good way to run a mix through this if you ever want to do something like that, or if you have stereo overheads or something like this, you have to be creative with it, as you cant just plug them in. But all aside, when it comes down to it, the unit is one of the best effects I have heard. PCM70 all the way. |
| | |
| | #50 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,022
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #51 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 23
|
Big Thanks for the answer ! I use LXP-15 II for tracking and it has got few good programs for my ears mainly Stage Reflex with small own mods gives bigger sound for track to my ears, I like it more than KAWAI RV-4. I think PCM 70 will not be for me as I need it for tracking. Do You think I can get even better sound with PCM 80 than LXP-15 II?! Thanks a lot ! |
| | |
| | #52 |
| Moderator Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 3,389
|
Everyone talks about the reverbs in the PCM70, but the six delay lines are one of the coolest features of the box, and people often ignore them to use the reverbs. You can get monster choruses and multi-taps out the 70. It was not designed to be primarily a reverb. Early in the design they were thinking it was just going to be a monster delay unit. The reverb came later. It's got some cool 'verb programs (tiled room, rich chamber, brass plate), but if that's all you use, you're missing out. And yes, I'd pick a 70 over an 80, no question.
|
| | |
| | #53 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 23
| |
| | |
| | #54 |
| Gear nut |
Found a link with V.2 and V.3 SysEx dumps for those interested. PCM 70 Ver 2 & Ver 3 SysEx Preset Registers. - signaltonoize.com They also have impulse responses of PCM70 and other classic boxes you can convolve with your tracks to emulate their FX. Probably as close to the originals as most plugins, but with that in mind you can try them while you save for the real thing ![]() Enjoy! DP
__________________ "We were going through very difficult times. My son had just bought and electric guitar..." My dad |
| | |
| | #55 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 6,736
| |
| | |
| | #56 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jun 2009 Location: Europe
Posts: 312
|
There is a MIDI editor from MOTU called Unisyn! A great working tool to edit your PCM 70 in a more convenient way! I tried to find something similar for Sounddiver but couldn't find it! MOTU.com - Profiles |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Lexicon PCM 42 and PCM 41 -- differences ?? | sage691 | High end | 31 | 6th August 2011 05:24 AM |
| Lexicon PCM 70 vs PCM 91 (and more related questions)?! | 88fingerz | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 14th March 2010 02:01 PM |
| difference between a lexicon pcm-41 and a pcm-42? | joninc | High end | 8 | 14th August 2007 03:39 AM |
| PCM 80/81 cards in PCM 90/91? | kevk | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 28th March 2006 05:28 PM |
| |