29th August 2007
|
#1 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,713
Thread Starter | La2a Hardware vs UAD LA2a Software - Part Deux!
OK, maybe you guys are sick of this, but I made more examples so I figured I'd post them and maybe also give Slaytex a chance to redeem his nuts, because I'd hate to see him get desperate one day and bet the frank and be left with nothing.
This test is with new samples and a new La2a DIY build.
The other night I finished building ANOTHER two La2a's. These two new ones use "modern" Sowter transformers (speced for the La2a), metal film resistors, new caps and tubes, etc. The circuit itself is exactly the same as the original but the transformer ratios are different giving the unit more gain than the last build and overall sounding much cleaner. (read: less distortion). My guess is that these new DIY units likely sound closer to the UA reissues than the older originals, although I don’t have a reissue around to test, so I don’t know for sure.
I personally think these examples will be a bit more challenging, but I'll leave it up to you slutz to tell me which is which.
Like the other test... All of the "A" samples are either the hardware or the software.
All of the "B" samples are either the hardware or the software. |
| |
29th August 2007
|
#2 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,713
Thread Starter | B Samples
B samples
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#3 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,713
Thread Starter | originals
originals
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#4 | | Gear Head
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 67
|
ooo crap. I accidently voted A= hardware.
I think hardware is actually b
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#5 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,270
|
B sounds much better. The transients also seem to decay slower in B. I've got the 2-1176 at home, I should compare it to the UAD 1176 sometime.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#6 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 199
|
Honestly, it's hard to say with these mp3s. the two do sound slightly different, especially the pumping of the lows, but I couldn't call one 'better' than the other from these samples.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#7 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jun 2006 Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 923
|
This is gonna be fun to watch! As it stands, the vote is split nearly 50/50.
I already voted.... but since I insinuated that I'm damn certain I can get this right, I don't want to post my answer and slant anyone's vote one way or the other. (However, I PM'd Norman the correct answer, so he can testify that I got it right if the need arises.)
In addition to letting folks get to know the differences, Norman's A/B threads have been a fun way to get inside the heads of different Gearslutz. It's a great psychological experiment and survey of tastes. Quote:
Originally Posted by sleepwalker I've got the 2-1176 at home, I should compare it to the UAD 1176 sometime. | True, you should. Things are always much easier it is to test things when other people set it up for us.
There's actually a 2-1176 vs UAD 1176 sample in part 1 of this thread.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#8 | | Gear interested
Joined: Mar 2007 Location: London
Posts: 14
|
I vote A for being the hardware:
I would swear by the Ka drum that A is the hardware because of the slight overdrive I can hear.
As for the rock mix I can hear the compression being tighter on B. A being more silky, in this case I prefer B cause it just works so well. so in this case with less conviction I still choose A as the hardware.
I'm completly unable to have an opinion on the acoustic mix and the acoustic guitar. Simply cause I don't feel much flavour on both. its straigh compression. they don't sound exactly the same.....but cant decide which is which...
So there it is I would be quite please to be wrong cause I have so much prejudice towards plugin. I'm really fed up with them although I agree in some case there are better for the task. I'm mainly a digital guy and I really love the sound of analog hardware. Quote: |
I've got the 2-1176 at home, I should compare it to the UAD 1176 sometime.
| Great, I'd love that.... really looking foward to it! |
| |
30th August 2007
|
#9 | | Moderator
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London, innit
Posts: 5,257
|
Now we're all in danger of losing nuts left right and centre... They're too close to call!
Based on listening to KA drums, I'd say A is hardware based on the overdriven kick drum at the start, and the "thump factor" of the kick generally.
The character of pumping on the hats and cymbal decay is really similar
But really, this is all academic as they sound very similar (both sound great --- the tone reminds me of Mute Math drums)
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#10 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Europe
Posts: 1,676
|
I made it even harder for myself - I listenen only to acoustic mix - immediate impression - A is HW...
Has more of that "inaudible" "mojo" that I attribute to HW... It brings more sibilance out in softer passages (not so good) - but also keeps more transients - the thing is more open and more "agressive" in a still good way... B is softer the way I don't like in UAD LA-2A... The most obvious it is when things get loud - A remains open and "magical" in choruses - I actually enjoyed the song, while in B I kept listening to how the compressor closes the loud part and how should I make it stay open and emotional - the way I keep thinking that when I mix with UAD ITB...
best
P.S. I am still saving for my HW LA-2A... or shouldn't I (cause I'm wrong this time)?
__________________
" The first question I ask myself when something doesn't seem to be beautiful is why do I think it's not beautiful. And very shortly you discover that there is no reason."
John Cage http://worldhappinessmusic.bandcamp.com/ |
| |
30th August 2007
|
#11 | | Moderator
Joined: Dec 2003 Location: London, innit
Posts: 5,257
|
Lovin' it! 50/50 neck and neck (or nut and nut)
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#12 | | Gear Head
Joined: Dec 2005 Location: Milan,Italy
Posts: 60
|
to me A is the hardware......but in this kind of threads I find that my ears are not good at all!!! |
| |
30th August 2007
|
#13 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,034
| I bet my nuts back that "A" is hardware. I hear harmonics in "A", but "B" sounds like it's trying to hard to be analog if you ask me. I prefer the sound of "B" for some things but It isn't hardware.
I agree with FossilTooth that this will be an interesting study on how we percieve things.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#14 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Oct 2004 Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Posts: 211
| just listened to the drums
A is hardware
B is software
something about the front-to-back depth (headroom). Easy to listen to on smaller speakers (laptops etc.)
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#15 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Oct 2004 Location: Tallinn, Estonia
Posts: 211
|
yeah listenend to other samples to - A is def hardware.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#16 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 159
|
A sounds better. On everything.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#17 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Aug 2004 Location: Germany
Posts: 3,420
|
A is hardware.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#19 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Sep 2004 Location: Tuxtla Gutierrez, Chiapas
Posts: 925
| A is hardware
I heard a thicker sounding bass drum in A , and the cymbals being less clear, made me think it was the hardware unit, since it had to pass through an ADDA conversion losing clarity. The B sample was clearer, but the bass drum didn´t have as much mojo... a bit thinner sound. But they were very close..... If I´m wrong..... I´d be very surprised because I don´t know how passing through ADDA conversion could make a sound clearer...unless the hardare la2a works some type of analoge magic on the signal........ OK.... which is which ????
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#20 | | Gear interested
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Slaytex I bet my nuts back that "A" is hardware. I hear harmonics in "A", but "B" sounds like it's trying to hard to be analog if you ask me. I prefer the sound of "B" for some things but It isn't hardware.
I agree with FossilTooth that this will be an interesting study on how we percieve things. | I also bet Slaytex's nuts that "A" is hardware 
If we are wrong, ask Universal Audio for a "nuts" plugin 
... well, for certain things maybe HARDware is better |
| |
30th August 2007
|
#21 | | Gear maniac
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 251
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Slaytex I bet my nuts back that "A" is hardware. | I'll bet you 1 dollar Paypal, you're wrong. 
It's almost impossible to tell on the single instruments. When listening to the (A/B Mixes) you can clearly hear the accentuated ESsssses in " A". This is a tell tail sign of the UAD plug.  Listen again. |
| |
30th August 2007
|
#22 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,034
| Quote:
Originally Posted by imdrecordings I'll bet you 1 dollar Paypal, you're wrong. 
It's almost impossible to tell on the single instruments. When listening to the (A/B Mixes) you can clearly hear the accentuated ESsssses in " A". This is a tell tail sign of the UAD plug.  Listen again.  | Sorry, I gotta stick to my guns and say "A" is hardware!
I've never heard any UAD stuff so I can't compare it to that. I can only compare it to other cool outboard compressors. I find this test easier than the last, because it is used in a pleasing way instead of a hard overdiven into distortion way. Again I feel that "B" is used completely different than "A" and it's setup to try and sound analog when it's not. But both sound great I admit.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#23 | | Lives for gear
Joined: May 2006 Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 680
|
Listening on laptop speakers again, and I prefer B, which I'm guessing is software. In the last test, I preferred the software, but guessed it was hardware simply b/c of the constant hardware praise my brain is fed on this site...
I sure would have a laugh if I was wrong this time, too.
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#24 | | Gear addict
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 451
|
I have to say with 100% confidence that "B" is hardware!
But a part of me will feel great about being wrong  . Love these tests!!
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#25 | | Gear interested
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 23
| I think Acoustic Mix A is better than B; the other samples sound very similar, except for the Electric Guitar attack (in B there is a clipping). |
| |
30th August 2007
|
#26 | | Gear maniac
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 251
| Quote:
Originally Posted by Slaytex Sorry, I gotta stick to my guns and say "A" is hardware!
I've never heard any UAD stuff so I can't compare it to that. I can only compare it to other cool outboard compressors. I find this test easier than the last, because it is used in a pleasing way instead of a hard overdriven into distortion way. Again I feel that "B" is used completely different than "A" and it's setup to try and sound analog when it's not. But both sound great I admit. | I respect that. I was just having fun. In fact I liked A the best for the drums, but B seems like hardware. (just listen to the way the cymbals decay in B, let alone the esssssing in the songs, from A)
I've used the LA2A plug for a while and know it's short comings. That's how I based my decision. I guess I have you at a disadvantage. Can't wait for the result's. Quote: |
Again I feel that "B" is used completely different than "A" and it's setup to try and sound analog when it's not.
| hmmm.. Stop and think about that. The LA2A only has 2 knobs... I wonder how you could set it up to be more analog? |
| |
30th August 2007
|
#27 | | Gear maniac
Joined: Feb 2006 Location: Washington DC
Posts: 249
|
ahhh! not another one of these!
i shall vote when i get back home.... fun fun
|
| |
30th August 2007
|
#28 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,034
| Quote:
Originally Posted by imdrecordings hmmm.. Stop and think about that. The LA2A only has 2 knobs... I wonder how you could set it up to be more analog?  | True, but I do know that using the exact same settings (input and output) will yield different results from both software and hardware. I feel it is best to just use your ears and not your eyes when trying to mimic a hardware piece. I just think that the software one is pushed harder on the input which in return gives it more saturation. From my experience software compression is cleaner at high compression settings than hardware hence my opinion.
Thanks. |
| |
30th August 2007
|
#29 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 4,037
|
I like a better.
|
| |
31st August 2007
|
#30 | | Lives for gear
Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,034
|
So........
I think today is going to be a great day for my nuts!
|
| | | |