![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| mymixisbetterthanyours! Joined: Oct 2006 Location: Berlin
Posts: 1,759
Thread Starter | Latency issues w/ Rosetta 800 and AD-16X
Hi there, i have a very strange problem here. System is PT HD3 on Quad-MacPro running PT 7.3 Converters are 1x AD-16X, 1x DA-16X, 1x Rosetta 800. All clocked via 192IO (i know, but it's not possible clocking via the XHD-Cards). All goes out to a AWS900. Now, if I route a identical snare-signal both to the Rosetta and the DA16X, I have flaming going on. Obviously the latencies are way different. With timadjuster I found the difference to be around 600 samples!! Now, whats the issue here? Also strange, the difference is influenced by HW buffer size. I don't get this. Doesn't the HW buffersize correspondent to all interfaces? Maybe interesting: The Rosetta 800 is connected to a different Card than the DA-16X. Any ideas anyone? Thanks.. OK, Problem solved. L3 on mono-master in some strange way f**ed up the ADC... Last edited by kosmokrator; 13th August 2007 at 04:01 PM.. Reason: Prob solved :) |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| iSSUES WITH ROSETTA 800 LIGHT PIPE | JGILL | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 16th January 2007 09:26 AM |
| Apogee Rosetta 800 vs. Apogee AD/DA 16x | mlocascio | High end | 36 | 26th July 2006 05:07 AM |
| Does Rosetta 800 Firemix have true zero latency monitoring? | Mark Warren | High end | 1 | 2nd November 2005 03:55 AM |
| Apogee Rosetta 800 Versus AD 16X | Bernard | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 2nd July 2005 08:44 PM |
| Rosetta 800 vs. AD-16x | not_so_new | So much gear, so little time! | 8 | 1st February 2005 07:59 PM |
| |