Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 21st April 2007   #1
Gear maniac
 
Marrone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Amsterdamn!
Posts: 260

Thread Starter
API A2D or Pacifica or LA-610 or Portico

Dear gearslutz,

I really need a new preamp. The main function of this preamp will be for recording vocals and occasionally Bass. Furthermore i would like to use this preamp to rerecord ITB sound like drums etc. What preamp would you advice. I do R&B and Pop. Thanks!!

Cheers,

Marrone
Marrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007   #2
Gear nut
 
projuice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 85

The portico 5016 would be a good option for what you want to do 1ch of verry nice preamp and the other channel di for nice for routing your itb sounds trew or recording bass
projuice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
SoundUniverse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: seattle,wa
Posts: 513

I have the 512 , Portico 5012 and the LA-610. They are all good for different things (get them all) , but the Portico is what I use the most for vocals, acoustic guitar and drum overheads. You basically get two flavors with the Portico (silk in/ silk out).

I use the 512's for drums and the LA-610 for direct bass (mostly) and some vocals
SoundUniverse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007   #4
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: tri state
Posts: 392

the pacifica can do no wrong. except for the bubbling face plate on mine.
liquidorange is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007   #5
Gear maniac
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 231

IMHO I would say If you could only afford one of these pres listed. Get the Pacifica. It is great for just about everything.
The UA6176 has the same pre as the LA610 but has an 1176 compressor instead of the LA2Aish comp. You would find it very useful since you can run the 1176 independent of the 610 if you want.
Depending on the mic you are using it can be very nice on R&B and Pop vocals and its a killer on Bass. Would also be very good for ITB drums. The 6176 is a real work horse.
__________________
Performance is the chick. Gear is the lingerie
markk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007   #6
Gear maniac
 
Marrone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Amsterdamn!
Posts: 260

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by markk View Post
IMHO I would say If you could only afford one of these pres listed. Get the Pacifica. It is great for just about everything.
The UA6176 has the same pre as the LA610 but has an 1176 compressor instead of the LA2Aish comp. You would find it very useful since you can run the 1176 independent of the 610 if you want.
Depending on the mic you are using it can be very nice on R&B and Pop vocals and its a killer on Bass. Would also be very good for ITB drums. The 6176 is a real work horse.

Which would be better for vocals and bass. The la-610 or the 6176?
Marrone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
robot gigante's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: out west
Posts: 3,864

I've used the Pacifica, the LA-610 and API pre's, but not the Portico. They're all really great options, my personal choice especially for vocals and bass would be a Pacifica (and a Purple MC77 for compression).
robot gigante is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st April 2007   #8
500 series nutjob
 
pan60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: 500 series Guru SKANK! ; )
Posts: 10,749

Send a message via Skype™ to pan60
i have the LA-610 and the A-Designs P-1.

the P-1 is very close to the Pacifica but not the same.
based on what i have, the Pacifica hands down.

although it is a nice pre i seldom us my LA-610 anymore.
__________________
www.pan60.com

Facebook
BLAST PAD Inventor just one invention among others.
A CHARTER MEMBER OF THE 500 FORMAT, MAFIA

Never EVER let the quality of your tools dictate what you do and don't get done, that's irresponsible and disrespectful to yourself as well as the muse.
Gregory Scott - ubk

it is easy to sound as though one was endowed with great intelligence, whilst speaking amongst a crowd of total morons
pan60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2007   #9
Gear addict
 
daillman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: bartow florida
Posts: 464

i have the la 610 and the pacifica,they both sound great and at the same time different.i had the 610 before the pacifica and did very nice recordings on it from vocals to bass to mpc2000xl .but since the pacifica arrived used in conjunction with my a r t pro vla my ua is used less but still used i will probaly use it when the new pacifica bug wears off but you cant go wrong with either.
__________________
My dreams keep me woke.
daillman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd April 2007   #10
Gear maniac
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 231

Quote:
Originally Posted by Marrone View Post
Which would be better for vocals and bass. The la-610 or the 6176?
The M610 Pre in both the 6176 and the LA610 are the same. IMO the comp in the LA610 is not as good as the 1176 comp in the 6176. As well you cant run the LA2ish comp independently from the pre like you can with the 6176.
I have a UA LA2A and an UA 1176 and the LA comp in the LA 610 does not sound like the UA LA2A but the 1176 comp in the 6176 sounds identical to my UA 1176.

To answer your question, both would be great for R&B\Pop Vocals and Bass but you will get much more mileage out of the 6176.

Regarding the Pacifica:
I have a P1, which to my ears sounds very close to the Pacifica and for all intensive purposes could be called a Pacifica with out the bragging rights. This a wonderful pre for pretty much everything but the M610 Pre in the 6176 really rocks on Bass IMO. The P1 works better for a variety of mics for vocals whereas the M610 is a little more picky on mics. The Peluso 22 47LA and the 2 251 work excellent on the M610.
markk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd April 2007   #11
Gear maniac
 
jazztone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los ANgeles
Posts: 180

I just wanted to add, the 610 in the LA does not sound exactly like the M610. It is voiced brighter and works excellent with a rich mic. Also the Compressor can be used without but not at the same time as the pre. You switch the unit to line in and it is actually much less colored that way versus within the Preamp circut driving a MIC. For this reason the unit is excellent as a vocal or bass compressor at mixdown. No the built in LA2ish comp does not sound like a real LA2A (it's missing the hair), that's what's cool about it. In places where the LA2A would be too thick this circut shines. Just a thought.

Jazztone
jazztone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2007   #12
Gear maniac
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 231

Quote:
Originally Posted by jazztone View Post
I just wanted to add, the 610 in the LA does not sound exactly like the M610. It is voiced brighter and works excellent with a rich mic. Also the Compressor can be used without but not at the same time as the pre. You switch the unit to line in and it is actually much less colored that way versus within the Preamp circut driving a MIC. For this reason the unit is excellent as a vocal or bass compressor at mixdown. No the built in LA2ish comp does not sound like a real LA2A (it's missing the hair), that's what's cool about it. In places where the LA2A would be too thick this circut shines. Just a thought.

Jazztone
You are correct about the comp in the LA610 being able to run by itself bypassing the pre. How I should have worded it was that you cannot run the pre and comp independently at the same time thus making the 6176 more flexible imho.

Also, I was incorrect when I said "M610" which is the version without eq which is not in either the 6176 or the LA610.
You are correct in stating the pre in the LA610 is voiced higher than the M610 but I’m not aware that the pre in the LA610 is voiced higher than the pre in the 6176.

When I was choosing between the two, the pres sounded the same, have the exact features and UA says the pre in the LA610 comes from the 6176.

That being said they may have done some tweaks that I’m unaware of.

Bottom line is they are both excellent on vocals and bass. I have yet to have the pre sound any good with ribbons though. Lacks the gain, at least on my unit.
markk is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
ART MPA GOLD & API A2D & UA M-610 WHICH ONE IS BEST? slum-beats Low End Theory 12 23rd April 2007 02:55 AM
Pacifica VS API A2D VS other sub $2K stereo pres? zulusound High end 24 22nd March 2007 03:14 PM
AMS -1073 DPA vs API A2D vs GR MP-2NV vs Portico 5012 ... FOR VOCALS!!! Antonio High end 12 10th February 2007 12:41 AM
Pacifica or Portico? Autocrat High end 10 11th September 2005 06:39 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:59 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.