![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
Closed | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #241 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,242
| On the Bryston website (and they are the kind of guys that actually listen to the sound of electronic components) : A/C POWER CABLES When you plug your power cord into the wall outlet you are in 'SERIES' with all the wire on the other side of the wall all the way back to the power source. The small length of power cord from the wall to the amp is insignificant compared to the miles of wire it is connected to. As long as the power cord can deliver the current and voltage required to drive the amplifier to full power it is as good as it can get. THANK YOU! now will everyone please read this, accept it as the truth and get on with your lives? Any disagreement with this requires total ignorance of basic physical realities. Please get over it and move on, we've got real gear issues to discuss......
__________________ steve Lexington 125 - High Resolution Location Recording lex125@pacbell.net http://www.lexington125.com |
| |
| | #242 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304
| Quote:
Dot, you are walking a pretty damn thin line already, reccomending things like the C1 above a tlm 103- hey if that's the way you feel- cool. But don't think that it doesn't raise some eyebrows. Now when you come out with this cable bullshit, your credibility is SERIOUSLY erroding. You might want to think about this a little bit. How can you have a valid rep for plugging products, like you do for a living, and go this far into quasi-science? dfegad | |
| |
| | #243 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462
|
In spite of my ranting before there is a very simple question that never got answered. Why would someone release a $4000 compressor that had a flaw in the power cord of all things. I hate to say it but the people building these things know a hell of a lot more about electricity than 99% of the people posting here if not more. I have a really hard time believing they`re just "not onto it yet" or trying to make it more economical. If it turns out these companies ARE using better cables then we should all easily be able to test our own cables in our own studios and tell some differences without having to go through the trouble of picking up the ones you guys are talking about. Right or wrong ? That`s the nicer version that isn`t beer or lack of sleep influenced in anyway. Will one of you guys give me a good answer to these two questions please ?
__________________ - Kev |
| |
| | #244 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
| Quote:
sorry kev - couldn't resist | |
| |
| | #245 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462
| Too true Edmann my good fellow. It`s either one or the other. Or lack of work influenced which is why I`ve been around here so damn much lately. |
| |
| | #246 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2003 Location: Nashville
Posts: 495
|
LOL. Like I said. Take a Monster ac cable, plug it into your guitar amp. More low end, more punch. Period the end. I don't care what science or you or anyone says. And if you can't hear it, lucky you. About all this other stuff I have no idea and I don't care and I have no idea but I do know of what I am speaking. So don't you or anyone else tell me I don't untill after you have tried it and then and only then will we know if you can hear well enough to hear it. :>) I'm done with this topic. It's rediculous. Yeah iIm the tired one today.
|
| |
| | #247 |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29
|
Perhaps you'd be so kind as to record your guitar amp with and without the AC cable? If the difference is so great I'm sure it would be apparent on a WAV file.
|
| |
| | #248 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: on the beach in warm, sunny SC
Posts: 872
Thread Starter | Quote:
The recording community is years behind the audiophile community. Most modern recording studios sound like ass as far as critical listening environments - consoles splashing early reflections, glass behind the monitors, PVC [ which acts as a capacitor ] in cables smearing audio, fan and machine noise, miles of cabling picking up RF interference. I'm not introducing "quasi-science" at all. But at the same time I don't need science to tell me what I hear. Science can not detect every little nuance of sound. And most measurements are taken with sine waves, which is only a tiny fraction of the whole picture. If "science" had all the answers, why would someone like Klaus Heyne tweak high-end mics with not much more than a pair of old trusty headphones and his voice. To quote Dave Royer in one of the conversations I've had with him, "All this is more art than science." I've had conversations with Pierre Sprey of Maple Shade Records. He said that he's measured differences in AC cables using an oscilloscope. I asked him why he hadn't written any papers on his findings, and he said he's too busy working to write a paper to prove something he already knows. Look, some people here laughed at his "tweaks" page. And while I've been laughing at some of the great humor in this thread, keep in mind that Sprey is a former NASA physicist and he was also one of the designers of the A-10 "Worthog" http://www.a-10.org/ . He is an empirical scientist! Mike Vans Evers is also a scientist. These guys are not practicing any kind of "voodoo". In fact to me it's anti-voodoo. They're working to dispell long-held beliefs and ignorance and simply give people better recordings and a better listening experience. I think it's "voodoo" to just go along with all the monkey-see, monkey do. You can't tell me that all the NS10's sitting on consoles in recording studios is anything more than "voodoo". People saw these bookshelf speakers on a high-end console in a picture on the cover of a recording magazine - and everyone fell in line. I don't know what the figures are, but I'm sure the percentage of musicians and engineers who have fried their hearing from exposure to loud amps and high-decible studio monitoring is fairly high. The bottom line is a lot of people jumping up and down saying there's no audible difference in cables either haven't tried it first-hand in a good critical listening environment, or else they just can't hear well enough. My wife can see stuff I can't see. We all don't have equal eyesight, and we all don't have equal hearing/listening abilities either.
__________________ Dan Richards Yackin' about gear and recording techniques at http://studioforums.com | |
| |
| | #249 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304
|
Dot, to each their own. |
| |
| | #250 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: on the beach in warm, sunny SC
Posts: 872
Thread Starter |
George, have you spent any time listening and comparing to see if you can hear an audible difference between, say, monitors in your studio with better AC cables as compared to the stock AC cables?
|
| |
| | #251 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Funky Town FL
Posts: 1,304
| Quote:
If you are concerned about the quality of your power, start with the box, and what's in the walls. Think about getting an equitech. The a/c cords supplied with modern gear are generally the same cords they were designed with, and will deliver manufacturer spec. There is such a thing as "putting the cart before the horse"... The rating of the a/c cord is going to make a bigger difference in longer runs- that will cause the gear to no longer work within spec. If you are using the provided cabling and keeping it short, or shorter than the provided cabling.... or even hard wiring, that is about the best you can do as far as a/c cabling goes, IMO. | |
| |
| | #252 | |
| Gear interested Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 29
| Quote:
I keep being surprised by how much effort and time the pro-AC-cable guys keep putting into their posts when in less time you could put the issue to rest. Just record a WAV file! Why is this such a problem for all you guys? | |
| |
| | #253 | |||
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: on the beach in warm, sunny SC
Posts: 872
Thread Starter |
I guess that's a "no" then, George. You haven't tried different AC cables in your own environment. Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I'm not against trying to make some A/B recordings of some sort, but it ain't gonna be tomorrow. I'll contact Pierre Sprey and get some more comments on his findings using an oscilloscope. | |||
| |
| | #254 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
| Quote:
Money: we are more likely talking about thousands - not hundreds of dollars - for AC cables (and in the case of vansevers - "resonators" and xylophones to support the AC/audio cables) A BIG Part of this debate is because those AC cables cost so MUCH money. Indeed, John Risch (link from your Project Studio Handbook site) is the ONLY guy I have read who speaks of what is inside and how to construct the same cable for pennies on the dollar. Science: If Mike Vans Evers et al are scientists (and I have no reason to doubt that they are), then they should be no strangers to creating and presenting a bit of scientific data, especially at those prices. Voodoo: is a practice that is shouded in secrecy, with extensive initiation rites required for the very few who are selected to learn the system. NS10's on the console bridge as seen on a magazine cover is billboard stuff. Really - no comparison, and no secrecy involved. Indeed Mike Vansevers even makes (expensive) wood blocks for instrumentalists to wear on their person - saying that it makes their instruments sound better when they play. The work of Vansevers etc does fall closer to the Voodoo analogy - shouded in secrecy - as all they are willing to say is "it sounds better - just ask so and so..." Again if this is true it does not seem like a far stretch to record the instrumentalists "With Wood and Without Wood" so the manufacturer-stated claims can be verified in an objective way. Audiophile Home Stereo Enthusiasts: Are not neccesarally miles ahead of the pro-audio world. That gear is heavily tweeked to deliver sparkly-pleasing results, and priced for those with lots of disposable income. I presume that the markup on this gear is miles beyond that seen in the pro-audio world. Very respected audio pros (guys from "our" side of the production fence) speak of the materials and methods that are used to manufacture sparkly-sounding gear, including the use of silver to create a form of high-end ringing distortion that the human ear interprets as pleasing, etc. In my early days I used this kind of gear to produce my music. The result was that when I took those recordings to other environments for playback, the sound was dull and smeared. Those recordings sounded great however when played back on the system that was used to create them. Production Environments That Sound Like Ass Compared With A Home Theater Sound System: have (for decades) produced all those GREAT records that sound KILLER on those $50,000 Home Theater Setups. So let's have the debate, but let's remain objective and not go throwing innacurate terminology and examples around. This way we can get closer to a real understanding of What Is What, What is really worth spending LOTS of money on, and if indeed those same designs can be had for literally a tiny fraction of what Vansevers et al charge. respectfully, Ed | |
| |
| | #255 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
| voodoo addendum...
gotta state this just to be clear (re: previous post): In no way do I mean to state that real Voodoo is a hoax. It is absolutely real, I know of people who practice it, and I know someone who died from it. To those who are initiated into the practice, there are methods that are taught and passed on from teacher to student. But these secrets are (by neccesity) closely guarded, as Voodoo is powerful stuff and can heal or kill people. So to be more accurate - I should say that Mike Vansevers et al ACT as though their research and products are Voodoo-like, and since this is physical/electrical hardware, that is hard to understand. ok, thanks - Ed |
| |
| | #256 | ||
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: Berlin / Germany
Posts: 5,167
| Quote:
To my ears it doesn´t sound too absurd. Quote:
__________________ "Am I the only one that tires of this "everything is subjective" watered-down-pop-culture-pseudo-philosophy bullshit?" Bravin Neff Wolgang Burr, former office leader of the German Chancellor before committee of inquiry: "You would not believe what unusual happens daily." "Patience, young Skywalker - let the object of your desires come to you." JTR "All thinking men are atheists." Ernest Hemingway | ||
| |
| | #257 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: on the beach in warm, sunny SC
Posts: 872
Thread Starter |
Hi Ed, have you compared any aftermarket AC cables in your studio to stock AC cables? I'm sure better AC cables can be made at home for cents on the dollar. But I also know that Requisite Audio made and tested over 100 different cables before arriving at the mastering AC cable they produce. I also know that a single AC cable takes almost an entire day for them to make by hand. But, hell, none of that even makes any difference if there is no change in the audio signal due to the AC cable. One easy way to find out would be to order a good but inexpensive $49 AC cord and try it out. http://www.gttgroup.com/absolutepower.html If you find out for yourself that there is a difference, then you can go from there as far as what you might like to do in the future to upgrade some of the AC cables in your studio. OTOH, if you don't hear a difference, then you don't hear a difference. |
| |
| | #258 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2002 Location: Santa Fe, NM
Posts: 566
|
I have to side with Dan on this, if you haven't listened and compared, then your'e talking trash since you haven't heard the difference. And what ever logic you're using ain't gonna get you the answer. Hell the earth could be flat for all you know. When I first tried out the Requisite AC cords I was skeptical; not quite as "voodoo" oriented like some of the folks here. But after demoing for hours with other engineers we all had to confess there is a difference. The difference can be dramatic depending on what gear your are using and the accuracy of your monitors. If you expect to plug a "boutique" AC cable into a Mackie mixer and listen through NS10s and hear a world of change, forget about it. These cables are for real, I know cause I took the time to demo them. I don't have any scientific data to present and I'd love to know "why" they work. Bob |
| |
| | #259 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2003 Location: Hoboken, NJ
Posts: 519
|
fine than we're all full of shit. because those who cannot come up with a simple friggen comparison graph or empiracle evidence *in ANY form*after and 18 page thread are equally full of shit. We wont spend the $$ to listen, you wont take the time to support your argument scientifically. End of Story. |
| |
| | #260 |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
|
Dot and bobmaus - you guys miss the point of what I am saying, so perhaps I have not stated it well. I am not saying that these expensive after-market cables don't function as stated. I am saying that the evidence would appear to support that notion that they are way over-priced, and that it is a mystery why a scientist-manufacturer would not leverage their training so as to provide a bit of science along with anecdote. The fact that science is not included in the spec (I think) creates a situation where one has to engage the willingness to suspend their disbelief - and that is one of the tenets Voodoo and other religious practice. However, this is not religion - this is hardware. The point is not whether I or anyone else have tried the cables. Whether I have or have not means nothing. The point is that IF it is real, it should be documentable in a repeatable-scientific fashion. the analogy of the man tuning microphones with his ears only is very concrete - like tuning a drum. Record it and the improvment is noticed right away, and those tuning-improvments could absolutely be shown on a measurement device that was callibrated and directed to show the efficiency and functionality of the membrane tension coupled with the electronics, whether such a device exists or not. So to be clear: I am not saying that specs-on-paper prove better sound - I am saying that better sound can also be shown as specs-on-paper. If these guys have the know-how to create these magic cables, then they certainly have the know-how to create measurement devices that will show What and Why...again especially at those prices. What do you say to Vansevers' pocket wood-blocks to improve the resonant efficiency of the musical instrument that the player is holding? Or the Zebrawood floor-xylophones to improve the resonant efficiency of cabling? Seriously - I am not dishing it - I am asking for your opinions. And of course - any science from Mike Vansevers is welcome. I applaud his willingness to push the envelope and put himself out on a limb. |
| |
| | #261 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: Berlin / Germany
Posts: 5,167
|
Don´t know what could be technically right or wrong about AC cables, but one thing looks certain to me; times where 50$ for an AC cable is considered inexpensive are definitly crazy times. Just besides the topic. Ruphus |
| |
| | #262 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: Berlin / Germany
Posts: 5,167
|
Hah! Your post wasn´t there when I started typing, Ed. Seems we had a similar idea. Although it appears to be for shame to talk about usury in the audio world. Ruphus |
| |
| | #263 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
| Quote:
Some of these AC cables run as high as $1500 per-piece, according to Lynn Fuston. It is common to see A-M AC cables that cost several hundred dollars each.... | |
| |
| | #264 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: Berlin / Germany
Posts: 5,167
|
Yes, I knew that. You can estimate my thoughts when I say 50$ to be already expensive. Greets, Ruphus |
| |
| | #265 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2003 Location: state of jefferson
Posts: 1,328
| Re: voodoo addendum... Quote:
I'd definitely rather take on Maple Shade Records than the real Voudoun! | |
| |
| | #266 | |
| Gear nut Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 103
| Quote:
| |
| |
| | #267 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2002 Location: on the beach in warm, sunny SC
Posts: 872
Thread Starter |
Hi, ajcamlet, have you tried any aftermarket AC cables in your studio? You know what? I haven't been scurrying around trying to find "factual" empirical evidence. Maybe it's around. I dunno. That's not my burden. If you need scientific evidence, then you look for it. Can you tell exactly how a mic sounds by reading the specs and a polar plot? Can you scientifically prove to me that an API mic pre sounds any better than a Mackie mic pre? I would have let this thread fall to the bottom days ago. The people who have kept this topic going are mostly those who've never even tried one of these AC cables. Man, if every topic was like this... I can see it now... Topic: Hey, check out the new Chandler TG2 Average response: "Scientifically prove it to me it sounds better!" Topic: The DAC1 rocks Average response: "Prove it, man. Post a WAV file." Topic: ADAMs monitors sound awesome Average response: "I don't believe the hype. Post a WAV file of the monitors." Topic: Which drums have been scientifically proven to be the best? Topic: Nora Jones CD, wow! Average response: "Scientifically prove to me that Nora Jones is better than Korn." Quote:
C'mon, people can set up great complete systems these days starting at under $20K. BTW, AC cables can get more expensive than $1500. : ) Not that I'm buyin' any – but they can get up there. I guess people who buy the $78, 000 turntable might want something nice to plug it in. | |
| |
| | #268 | |
| Gear addict Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 444
| Re: Re: voodoo addendum... Quote:
But i guess that is another thread, and one where I would only be the student. | |
| |
| | #269 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2003 Location: Berlin / Germany
Posts: 5,167
| Quote:
However the reasons for the pricing of the past are manifold. It doesn´t serve as a logical answer for the present. What you get as an AC cable for 50$ is without question overpriced. As I said it in other threads before. The pricing is oriented on where you can get people to and not too often related to the actual goods. Many think that would be alright. I think they just don´t get the idea how we all could be living without usury. Just my 2 cents. Ruphus | |
| |
| | #270 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Oct 2003 Location: Beantown
Posts: 2,462
|
I`m going to say it a third time. Why would the makers and manufacturers of high end audio equipment sell us gear for $4000 plus and skimp out by not adding a decent power cable ? I have a feeling they know more about this than any of us and wouldn`t do that if it made a difference in their product. I`d like to hear what Hutch or Geoff Tanner has to say about this more than you. |
| |
Closed
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Anyone using Waves LoAir? Worth $20? | DaveE | Music computers | 12 | 5th December 2011 04:23 PM |
| That ac cord "sound" | mahasandi | Geekslutz forum | 41 | 22nd January 2007 09:06 PM |
| Does anyone here use these extension cords for their monitors? | blucaller | Low End Theory | 6 | 26th October 2006 11:39 PM |
| a different AC cord question | juniorhifikit | High end | 2 | 14th March 2004 04:53 AM |
| AC Cords.....how about equipment supports? | damon | High end | 0 | 12th March 2004 05:50 PM |
| |