Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > High end


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 12th April 2007   #1
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 866

Thread Starter
Help choosing a mic!

Hi Fellow Slutz,

I'm about to purchase a new mic and would appreciate any input.
Currently I use a crappy Studio Projects C1 and until recently used a Rhode NT2 and a rather old C414 through a Focusrite VoiceMaster Pro.

The Focusrite will be replaced by a Millennia STT-1 Origin.
The following mics are available locally;
Neumann
Rhodes
SE Electronics
DPA

The mic needs to be a general purpose mic that has patterns and can be used for dialogue (we do tons of radio), singing and some instrumental work.

David
Sonic Nomad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2007   #2
Gear nut
 
Brent Casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles Westside
Posts: 85

Hi David,


What sort of problems are you having with the C1 microphone?


Brent Casey
Studio Projects Microphones
877-563-6335
Brent Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2007   #3
Lives for gear
 
lowfreq33's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,186

So the NT2 (not the NT2A) is actually a pretty decent mic, so I'd keep that around just in case. I'm a big fan of the SE mics in the bang for the buck category. The Gemini is a really thick, dark sounding tube mic, great for a "warm" mic, but not right for every voice. Works well on people with a strident quality to the voice, smooths things out a lot. The 5600 is a little more neutral (for a tube mic), the 3300 is VERY similar to the U87 (which for me means I won't be buying one), but a lot of people like that sound. Since you mentioned Neumann I assume you have a little bit of a budget? Check out mics by Peluso, Lawson, and maybe Gefell in the high range. The key is to have a few choices to accomodate different voices. If I had $2k to play with I'd get 3 mics that were very different. Maybe the SE gemini, a Blue baby bottle and an AT 4047 (similar to a Neumann FET 47). These would cover just about any voice type you might encounter. Or you could just use a 57 and be done with it.
lowfreq33 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th April 2007   #4
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,753

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic Nomad View Post
The mic needs to be a general purpose mic that has patterns and can be used for dialogue (we do tons of radio), singing and some instrumental work.

David
What's your budget? $2-3k? more or less?
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2007   #5
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 866

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brent Casey View Post
Hi David,


What sort of problems are you having with the C1 microphone?


Brent Casey
Studio Projects Microphones
877-563-6335
Er.... Hi Brent,

I suppose that came out wrong, "crappy"!!!
The C1 has been a work horse around here for some time. It's a real no brainier for tracking vocals on certain styles of music. In fact it was used on last years "Big Hit" in these parts.
I have found that the vocals will really cut through in the mix and sit snug.
But when it comes to more sibilant vocals, well that’s another story.

Might be me but I find that EQing some material captured by both the C1 and the NT2 does not deliver the expected results. The C1 will always be kept for it’s abilities. For it’s price it’s paid for itself many times over. That’s the thing when recording most VO’s and certain voices for certain styles of music it starts to show.
This has also made consider that I may not have to spend big dollars on a boutique or “industry” standard mic.
Sonic Nomad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2007   #6
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 866

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by lowfreq33 View Post
So the NT2 (not the NT2A) is actually a pretty decent mic, so I'd keep that around just in case. I'm a big fan of the SE mics in the bang for the buck category. The Gemini is a really thick, dark sounding tube mic, great for a "warm" mic, but not right for every voice. Works well on people with a strident quality to the voice, smooths things out a lot. The 5600 is a little more neutral (for a tube mic), the 3300 is VERY similar to the U87 (which for me means I won't be buying one), but a lot of people like that sound. Since you mentioned Neumann I assume you have a little bit of a budget? Check out mics by Peluso, Lawson, and maybe Gefell in the high range. The key is to have a few choices to accomodate different voices. If I had $2k to play with I'd get 3 mics that were very different. Maybe the SE gemini, a Blue baby bottle and an AT 4047 (similar to a Neumann FET 47). These would cover just about any voice type you might encounter. Or you could just use a 57 and be done with it.
lowfreq33,

It's really a NT-2A!
Have had my eye on the Gemini and the 5600. rather fancy your recommendation of the Gemini, a Blue baby bottle and an AT 4047. Sounds like a good place to start.
Sonic Nomad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2007   #7
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 866

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
What's your budget? $2-3k? more or less?

Tony,

I figure $3k! no more than that ATM.
Sonic Nomad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2007   #8
Gear nut
 
Brent Casey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Los Angeles Westside
Posts: 85

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic Nomad View Post
Er.... Hi Brent,

I suppose that came out wrong, "crappy"!!!
The C1 has been a work horse around here for some time. It's a real no brainier for tracking vocals on certain styles of music. In fact it was used on last years "Big Hit" in these parts.
I have found that the vocals will really cut through in the mix and sit snug.
But when it comes to more sibilant vocals, well that’s another story.

Might be me but I find that EQing some material captured by both the C1 and the NT2 does not deliver the expected results. The C1 will always be kept for it’s abilities. For it’s price it’s paid for itself many times over. That’s the thing when recording most VO’s and certain voices for certain styles of music it starts to show.
This has also made consider that I may not have to spend big dollars on a boutique or “industry” standard mic.
Heh ...
The C1 does tend to stand out, due to a couple of amplitude peaks in the 5kHz - 7kHz range. I weighed in primarily because you mentioned that your facility was doing a lot of dialogue work and the C1 has always been well received by vo/dialogue folks. I wondered if something was wrong with the mic itself.


Brent Casey
PMI Audio Group
877-563-6335
Brent Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2007   #9
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,753

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic Nomad View Post
Tony,

I figure $3k! no more than that ATM.
For $3,000... You could get a Peluso 47 LE or Pearlman TM-1, and a Peluso 251. A combination of these mics would give you a lot of flexibility. One would give you the full bodied, vintage 47 vibe, and the 251 would give you the modern, open top end. I've been using primarily the 251 or 47 LE on pretty much every vocal I've tracked for the last 6 months. At this point, there isn't much left to be desired.

I think the 47 LE might get the edge over the Pearlman in your situation, due to the 9 polar patterns.
__________________
Tony Belmont

We Sell Gear!
High Profile Audio.....PluginDiscounts.com
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2007   #10
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 866

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyBelmont View Post
For $3,000... You could get a Peluso 47 LE or Pearlman TM-1, and a Peluso 251. A combination of these mics would give you a lot of flexibility. One would give you the full bodied, vintage 47 vibe, and the 251 would give you the modern, open top end. I've been using primarily the 251 or 47 LE on pretty much every vocal I've tracked for the last 6 months. At this point, there isn't much left to be desired.

I think the 47 LE might get the edge over the Pearlman in your situation, due to the 9 polar patterns.
Tony,

You are the second person to tell me about the Peluso 22 47SE!
And my gut tells me I should not brush it off.

Thanks....
Sonic Nomad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2007   #11
Moderator
 
TonyBelmont's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Boston,MA Providence,RI
Posts: 15,753

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sonic Nomad View Post
Tony,

You are the second person to tell me about the Peluso 22 47SE!
And my gut tells me I should not brush it off.

Thanks....
I actually prefer the 47 LE (the difference being the tube).. But, yes they are both incredible microphones.
TonyBelmont is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2007   #12
Gear maniac
 
markk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 231

22 47LE
markk is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Choosing a good first mic sm80808 Low End Theory 44 16th August 2011 09:39 PM
Choosing a live vocal mic Art So much gear, so little time! 7 15th March 2007 08:38 PM
help choosing a vocal mic magnuspater So much gear, so little time! 0 20th June 2006 11:44 PM
Need help choosing a vocal mic Zoe-Ruth So much gear, so little time! 5 1st February 2006 01:34 AM
PLEASE HELP choosing a mic ramjet So much gear, so little time! 6 6th January 2006 03:12 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:51 PM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.