![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 21
Thread Starter | Manley Reference Gold or Neumann M149 I've only heard the Neumann M149 and have seen the manley refference gold only on the net. I'm saving up for a good valve mic and don't know if i should get the M149, which is very nice or if i should trust my instincts(sp) and jsut order the manley refference gold Thanks Hannes |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict | I haven't heard the Neumann, but the MANLEY is freaking sweet. http://www.synchromeshstudios.com http://www.myspace.com/lynam http://www.myspace.com/haste http://www.myspace.com/heroicme http://www.myspace.com/rantingsofeva http://www.myspace.com/mayleneandthesonsofdisaster http://www.myspace.com/mikeshaw 95% sure that everything on those pages were recorded with the Gold Reference. Maylene and the Sons of Disaster might have been done with an SM7 though. The best example of the Gold Reference would be the song "Belong" on the Mike Shaw Myspace. Its a great great mic and I would buy it in a heart beat if I had the dough. Also makes a great room mic. Hope this helps in the decision making! |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 4,479
| I have the Manley Gold, Soundelux 251, Brauner VM-1,the M149,etc.... The Gold is the last one I use for vocals especially for male vocals..... I think it's more suitable for recording instruments -- at least that's what I' m using it for. It (the Gold) doesn't have the body and presence that I like for vocals... YMMV though. I think this topic's been covered before, search and see what others have said about it.
__________________ THE MPCIST ![]() |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: LA
Posts: 558
| I have used the Manley and own an M149, the Manley has a nice top but I agree with MPCist: I think it is a bit thin for an all-rounder for me, like it on acoustic instruments like violin or cello. The M149 has it all, nice top, strong mids and big bottom (like my women I want to get another M149 for drum rooms. I have done mono drum room with it and it made the kick have an impact I have not heard before--loved it. they are both great mics but if I was micing a violin I might choose the manley, if I was doing vox, drums acoustic guitar, I choose the Neuman. My .02.
__________________ Sean Ingoldsby Real Time Studios Ojai, California http://homepage.mac.com/seaningo/ "Dung beetles with ostentatious horns tend to have smaller testicles" source unknown, as read in Harpers Findings, Dec. 2006. |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: Asheville, NC
Posts: 405
| Quote:
Kinda agree, but with some female vocalists - the Manley has the magic - It recently beat out a vintage U47 and C12. So how often do you use the Brauner????? | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: In the Woods
Posts: 26
| M149...a very versatile studio microphone! |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 1
| Legendary movie trailer VO Don LaFontaine uses the Manley Reference. His backup, the Sennheiser 416, aka the "L.A." mic. I have a 416. Love it! Saving for a Manley. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,369
| Manley Gold Reference vs M149 Both of these mics are in my collection and both are near and dear to my heart. I find the color of the M149 to be like the sweetest of cream, but colorer nevertheless. The Manley is crystal clear and to my ear brings it all out-- low, mids, and high. The Manley won't tame an edgy voice but the M149 colored texture can sure help. A beautiful sound will sound most beautiful through my Manley-- I agree it is great for strings and awsomely better for capturing the delicacy of room ambience (assuming the ambience is good to start with). I use the M149 more on vocals than the Manley simply because I like the color. I use the Manley more on acoustic string instruments and feel it captures a truer image. I have found that I can sort of EQ the Manley to give it a warm and creamy sound but can't EQ an M149 to make it sound like the Manley (entirely subjective observation). Recently I was overjoyed with the performance of the Manley in the following setup. The ambience of the room was perfect and I wanted to get it. I put the Manley on a boom up about 15 feet, about half way toward the ceiling and set it on a fig 8 pattern. After making sure there were no phase problems and making subtle changes in position I started tracking. In the mix I blended the Manley with the primary close mic of the instrument. This gave me a "organic" reverb that I couldn't have achieved with any type of box-- I loved the result. I tried the exact same setup with the M149 and it didn't work the same magic but a couple of my ribbons were close. If I could could have only one or the other I would take the M149 because it makes my voice sound better. This is more of a statement about the lack of tonal quality of my voice than the quality of the mics. You can't go wrong with either mic and rest assured it won't be the last mic you purchase. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear | for me, manley gold is better than m149 |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear | what pre did you test on vocals with manley gold ? my neve 1073dpa and manley, has vocals body Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 182
| Manley gold vs 149 We have both of those and they are very different animals. I never loved the 149 on vocals. It's fantastic on piano, room and a great overall mic. The Manley is often fabulous on many vocals esp female,, it usually beats out our 47's, C-12's, for pop / R'n'b stuff. One of the producers here swears by them for overheads. They sound very open , bright and seem quite sensitive to the mic pre. They sound ********ly good with Focusrite ISA-110's which is not a normal first choice for me. They sound real good with any of the class A Neve's, so so with the API's crap with the SSL's(what else is new) and IMHO so so with most tube pre's people have brought in. Daryn |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 6,070
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear Guru Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: So Cal
Posts: 10,995
| I've always loved the M149 on vocals. LOL Just goes to show, one mans gold is another man's trash. See if you can rent both for a side by side or get to somewhere that has one or both and try them out. I wouldn't spend that kind of money on a hunch. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: Toronto
Posts: 182
| Best advice yet. Rent em both, and a few others in your pice range. |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: nyc / london
Posts: 3,510
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: San Diego
Posts: 39
| They're both great choices. I'd go to a boutique audio shop and audition both. I love the M-149 on piano and at times prefer it to an AKG C24. I've heard great things when used on vocals. I also have a friend who swears by the m149 for his vocal/acoustic guitar setup. I've used the Reference Gold and had great results with vocals. Depending on the sound you want. Never tried it on anything else. Pick your poison. It's difficult because it's like comparing high end italian sports cars. Either way you go you're going to get an awesome product. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear interested Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1
| GREAT SUGGESTION! I did just that and was surprised the Manley was better on the soft female voice I used it for - testing straight through Apogee Duet interface no pres...the Manely reproduced voice with warmth, clarity and full bodied sound - while the M149 was too thin but sounded better on the acoustic guitar. When dealing with mics on any app. but esp vocals...Try it out in your environment. This same female vocalist ended up finding her perfect mic was NeumannTLM49 - just the right balance of sparkle, presence, lower end and mids. (the manley needed dialing up of the presence ultimately) |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear | 3rd the suggestion to consider other mikes. I have gotten some sweeet female vocals with the Ref Golds, but i'm not sure that I would pick it every time for vocals. I mostly have used it in applications where there is some distance between the mic and the source (instruments in other words), there it excels imho. The m149 sounds pretty good on almost everything, but it lacks a little of the 'wow' factor to my ears. Wouldn't be my first pick either. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Quincy, MA
Posts: 7,376
| I hear the MANLEY custom shop is opened. I don't know what this has to do with the choice between a MANLEY GOLD and a Neumann M149, but I wanted to contribute to the discussion in some way, since I didn't have anything else to really offer.
__________________ Adam Brass adam@dspdoctor.com DSPdoctor "Pro Audio Gear And Advice for the Modern Recording Studio" ________________ "Any opinions above are worth exactly what you paid for them." Anonymous "If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward. Thomas Edison RTFM |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 2,912
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2005 Location: LA
Posts: 1,475
| Two radically different mics. However, the M149 is not really what you would consider a tube mic, where the Manley is. The M149 has a tube, but its function is as a flavorizer in a transformerless circuit that uses an IC! The Manley uses a real plate loaded tube circuit and a transformer. The Manley is very much in the style of the C12, and like a C12, is not right for everything. But if you have a sources that wants open highs and brightness, it's freaking gorgeous. The M149 sorta lives in the world of things that a U47 works on, but without sounding anywhere as good as a vintage Neumann. They are an OK mic for around $2,500, but are otherwise a complete rip off, if you look under the hood and see what's there. As sad example of Neumann trying to save as much money as possible on build costs, then getting people to spend more money than the product is worth, because of the look and the badge.
__________________ "Eventually your experience catches up with your opinion." - David Palmer |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Alaska
Posts: 1,369
| I just picked up a couple of matched M149s. Now I have three. Still really liking the Manley Gold Reference. Comparing these mics is like comparing apples and oranges. They sound very different. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear maniac | Read this before buying a Manley Mic I know this post has long since run its course, but I feel like this info would still be useful as a reference for anyone researching a similar purchase. The capsule for the Manley reference microphones, should it need to be replaced, (damaged or worn out) has doubled in price. That's $1,500. That's been enough to slow the repair of one of my ref gold mics. I bought my pair used five years ago and they've been back to Manley's service department once already. Even since getting them back, they've been a bit troublesome still. With that said, they are great microphones. thumbsup They definitely aren't all-around workhorses, but they sound very flattering on some sources. I wish I could depend on mine more or justify the cost of repair. ![]() |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: bk
Posts: 608
| Hannes, Pretty much everything has been said here. Even though you are asking about two completely different mics, they both have a lot to offer, just not on everything everyday. I think the Manley Gold does what it does better (acoustic instruments, female vox) however, if you're looking for a great sounding versatile mic, i;d say keep looking - with an open mind and an open ear! |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Manley Cardioid vs. Manley Gold | Jay Lee | High end | 7 | 24th May 2006 03:57 AM |
| Manley Gold reference Mic | Jamz | High end | 9 | 11th May 2005 06:06 PM |
| |