![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Recording The acoustic Guitar!... | Gordon -10 | So much gear, so little time! | 19 | 12th May 2005 11:28 AM |
| Recording acoustic guitar | Revelation | High end | 2 | 21st April 2005 08:41 AM |
| acoustic guitar recording | songman | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 14th December 2004 08:50 AM |
| Recording Acoustic Guitar | Jason Poulin | High end | 38 | 27th October 2003 07:44 AM |
| Recording acoustic guitar | Carlos Boll | So much gear, so little time! | 27 | 3rd October 2003 09:26 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
| Recording Acoustic Guitar Hello all, I'm new to this forum and fairly new to recording. I'd like to know what high end microphones you would use to record solo acoustic guitar? I am looking to capture the same sound as Al Petteway, particularly the album Caledon Wood I have heard elsewhere on the web good things about vintage AKG C-24 and vintage U47...what do you folks think? What would your set up be? Thanks, Matt P |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Austin/Dallas,Tx
Posts: 512
| I just got my new Wunder CM7 last week... it is UNbelievable! on acoustic guitar... sillky smooth, not hyped anywhwere... HIGHLY Recommended.
__________________ This Mortal Coil - It'll End in Tears |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 2
| Thanks for the feedback, One more question I forgot to ask. Do I go for a stereo mic, or a matched pair? Thanks again, Matt |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Victoria BC, Canada
Posts: 424
| I really dig my KMi84 -> Flamingo. This combination is my fave on acoustic guitars and fiddle. I also prefer to mic acoustics, mono. just my .02 |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Midland TX
Posts: 1,079
| Quote:
Try a Peluso2247 or a Pearlman through a Pacifica if you get a chance...you won't look back...killer combination for any acoustic souces.
__________________ Ken Morgan Wireline Studio Midland, TX Don't Blame Me, I Just Recorded What You Played | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Downey, CA
Posts: 548
| Personally I think stereo miking is cool,but I think using 2 different kind of mics gives the instrument a more real sound to it. Example: C-12 at the hole and a 451 at the neck. Gives it a bit more depht. Although sometimes one mic will do the job. It all depends what the guitar is doing.
__________________ myspace.com/esgarsmusic myspace.com/cheesgar "You can NEVER, fix it in the mix"
|
| | |
| | #7 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 416
| Quote:
I suppose if you used the same mics, pre and converters, you would be closer than using a different signal chain. But that signal chain might not be the best for you. You are a different player, with a different guitar, recording in a different room. I record solo acoustic fingerstyle and classical guitar. I've spent quite a bit of time trying and owning different gear to find a few items (of the hundreds and hudreds available) that work best for me. Here's what I use: Mics: 2x Schoeps CMC6/MK4 2x Microtech Gefell M294 1x Microtech Gefell UMT800 1x AEA R84 Preamps: Pendulum Audio MDP-1a Pendulum Audio SPS-1 John Hardy M-2 There are numerous combinations with this limited gear list, from very musical and euphonic to very detailed and transparent. | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2005 Location: Texas
Posts: 1,898
| 414, c451b, sm81, lawson l57, aea r84, km84, josephson e22, md441 I've used all of those, and they all have their distinct sounds. Doesn't matter to me as long as it sounds nice. Although my sm81's see the most for acoustics |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,433
| Nice mic and an A designs P1 pre.
__________________ If you don't like it don't do it, its like banging your head into a brick wall, you always feel better once you stop. http://www.myspace.com/lizard42c http://www.myspace.com/eggshellrecords http://www.underworldmusicproductions.com http://www.myspace.com/poetlaureatte http://www.myspace.com/thanorthernlightscrew http://www.myspace.com/originaldrzeus |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear addict | I agree that player makes more of a difference than the mic. But bad mic choice/placement can ruin an otherwise great performance. Several people mentioned KM84's. I have a matched pair that I use all the time on acoustic. Hard panning them gives a really wide feel. But a few times lately I've used a LDC (Neumann M7) at the neck and a KM84 near the bridge, and it turned out great each time. It made it feel even wider because of the slightly different tone from each mic. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Norway
Posts: 178
| Quote:
Hi Here's another way of getting GREAT guitar sounds, with superior control of left/right image, tone and ambience. Check out Ronny Morris' post at the bottom of page 1: http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/ind...tty#msg_125991 cheers Jørn | |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 416
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Oct 2004 Location: Norway
Posts: 178
| Quote:
Read Ronny's post and try out his three-mic technique (see link in my post above). It is vastly superior to any other setup with matched pairs etc. that I have used (spaced omni array, x/y, Blumlein figure 8's, M/S, ORTF, 12th fret/body, 12th fret/shoulder etc, especially when it comes to versatility in sound. You have full control of the width, size and fullness of your guitar sound when mixing. There's practically no phase issues. Your mics are picking up the different parts of the total guitar sound on axis and with very good signal to noise, because of the close proximity. Good, strong and clean signals blended together. The shoulder mic gives you your ambience and adds to the fullness of your sound. Blend it in to taste. Supplement with a bit of reverb on the 12th fret and/or hole mic if you want a more ambient sound. Good luck! | |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Annapolis, MD/L.A.
Posts: 3,612
| Quote:
Also, I wouldn't worry so much about the two mics being "matched." If you wanted the mics to both pick up the exact same thing and sound exactly the same, why would you be using two mics? Variety is the spice of life. | |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2003 Location: mass
Posts: 1,285
| Quote:
that was a good post..im gonna try the over the shoulder position. i've heard if it but never tried it. im happy with my acoustic recordings. i just got a U99 so i'll use that for the shoulder position | |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: around the corner
Posts: 1,964
| I think the over the shoulder and in front works better than spaced pair or x/y. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Annapolis, MD/L.A.
Posts: 3,612
| |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1,257
| If you can play facing a wood wall or wood gobo, about 8+ feet away... if you have spare tracks, then try a LDC mic a foot room the wall on figure 8. Its a great way to add real ambience. |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2004 Location: Chicago
Posts: 751
| Matt, 1. First and foremost the Al Petteway is a really good player. 2. Al uses some fine instruments like Ryans, Olsons, etc. These instruments are extremely rich in harmonics. 3. He plays in open tunings - you only enhance the resonant illusion with open tunings 4. From what I read, the recordings were made C24'S or with mics that had ck12 capsules put in them. Great choice. Pres appear to be API's or Api consoles. Cannot go wrong with this. 5. Lastly for this type of sound I would recommend a nice lively wood floor etc. 6. You can get a nice sound with many microphones if you throw on some headphones, turn them up fairly loud. Have the player play softly and listen to where you like the sound of the resonance. It does not have to look correct. Does it sound like you want. Lock the mic down and record. (turn the phones down before giving it back to him) Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: 3rd Coast
Posts: 2,025
| I've tried many combinations over the years and continue to experiment. It's tough to make a perfect call every time because there are so many variables to consider: type of song, intended tone, type of guitar, guitar player, etc. I've gone through the gamut of mics including a C12, 251, U47, KM184, KM54, Schoeps CMC6/MK4, and a few others. My favorite for forward-sounding tone that cuts well in the mix is the KM54 with a C12 close 2nd. For richer, fuller tone my favorite is probably a U47. As for mic pres, I use a Neve 1272 most often with a John Hardy a close 2nd. The Hardy gets the job done when I'm looking for cleaner tone. Best overall combination, IMO: Collings dread guitar-->KM54-->Neve pre. A great synergistic sound that has it all. But again, experimenting is half the fun. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2004 Location: 3rd Coast
Posts: 2,025
| Good point. A little difference between the two mics can play nice stereo tricks, too. A matched set is good for concert piano, but not so important with acoustic guitar. |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 54
| Agreed on the Neumann KM-54 for acoustic guitar. They are a really stellar mic for acoustic guitar recordings. Unfortunately I traded my KM54 for a KM56 which is also a way cool mic for acoustic guitar, but a little different than the KM54: must be the relation of capsule to the body. Nevertheless, both mic are great on acoustic guitar, as all of the nickel diaphragm Neumann mics are for acoustic music. Great top end that never seems to fizzy. I also like Neumann U64 mics on acoustic guitar with Neve 33114 or Chandler LTD1 pre |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |