True bypass with not true bypass defeat purpose - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > So many guitars, so little time! > Guitar pedals, effects, amps, cabs, backline, accessories etc.

True bypass with not true bypass defeat purpose
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th September 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
NoPro's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 676

Thread Starter
True bypass with not true bypass defeat purpose

I have several true bypass effect pedals and 2 not true bypass pedals... Does this defeat the purpose of true bypass if all are used together?
NoPro is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Location: London
Posts: 670

True bypass means that the input is connected to the output with no circuitry in between. It should mean that there is no noise or colouration introduced to the signal. However, it can mean that there are problems with level and impedance, which buffered bypass circuits do address. With a chain of three pedals it probably doesn't matter much either way.
explorer is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #3
dsv
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 12

No. Actually it may be better that way!

Both true bypass and non-true bypass have advantages and disadvantages.

True bypass: there is no modification of the signal (advantage). However, having many TB pedals in series will lead to long cables, and they can load the pickup resulting in the often mentioned "tone loss" (disadvantage).

Non-true bypass: a quality non-true bypass circuit often includes a good buffer, which avoids the loading effect of the cables on the pickups (advantage). However, each buffer does not reproduce exactly the input signal (especially true with low quality ones). Therefore, too many in series may lead to tone degradation (disadvantage).

The best of both worlds is then:
- 1 buffered pedal at the beginning of the signal chain, to avoid loading of the pickups
- eventually 1 buffered pedal at the end if there is a long line to the amp
- everything TB in between.

There are of course exceptions, such as the Fuzz Face pedals which (according to the general consensus) do not like buffer pedals or non-true bypass before them, since part of their signature sound and responsiveness to the guitar controls comes from the loading of the pickups.
dsv is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th September 2012   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 5,476

Quote:
Originally Posted by NoPro View Post
I have several true bypass effect pedals and 2 not true bypass pedals... Does this defeat the purpose of true bypass if all are used together?
If you can't hear the difference in tone when the non-true bypass pedals are in line but not engaged, then it doesn't matter. Put them in, play for a while, take them out, listen for a difference. If you hear a tonal difference, it does... or it might, depending upon how you feel about the tonal change.
__________________
"I believe that entertainment can aspire to be art, and can become art, but if you set out to make art you're an idiot."

Steve Martin

Show business: we're all here because we're not all there.

Resistance is not futile. It is voltage divided by current.
Bill@WelcomeHome is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 2,090

There are at least 3 general kinds of bypass:

True bypass, discussed well above.

Buffered, discussed above as well.

Some other kind of passive bypass that leaves part of the circuit attached to the inpu or the output-this is what many of the older MXR and DOD pedals did, also EHX and it colored the sound with no measurable benefit. Buffered pedals before these will help a little, but true bypass loops for them are better. Almost no new pedals use these weird bypass schemes.
drbob1 is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd September 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
NoPro's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 676

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by drbob1 View Post
There are at least 3 general kinds of bypass:

True bypass, discussed well above.

Buffered, discussed above as well.

Some other kind of passive bypass that leaves part of the circuit attached to the inpu or the output-this is what many of the older MXR and DOD pedals did, also EHX and it colored the sound with no measurable benefit. Buffered pedals before these will help a little, but true bypass loops for them are better. Almost no new pedals use these weird bypass schemes.
I guess it comes down to what just sounds good. Of course I want to mix a big muff with a newer pedal so my concerns are technical but foremost sound. These replies do help for perspective and well appreciated. Shit I plug em in and play with the order of pedals and go from there ..
NoPro is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
With a Cheapness (Compressors) Inexpensive Compressors for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 87 8th February 2013 09:39 PM
With a Cheapness (EQs) Inexpensive Equalization for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 35 13th August 2009 08:05 AM
With a Cheapness - Microphones Labs Low End Theory 123 31st May 2007 05:37 AM
With a Cheapness (Reverbs/Multi-Effects) Inexpensive Loot for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 38 11th April 2007 10:17 PM
With a Cheapness (Delays & such) Inexpensive Time-based FX for the Budget-Minded Slut Kent Low End Theory 29 17th July 2006 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.