Attenuators and impedance transformers - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum

Attenuators and impedance transformers
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th October 2012   #1
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 665

Thread Starter
Attenuators and impedance transformers

Hello venerable geeks!

I am truly out of my depth here so would appreciate your assistance with my proposed home studio design. I think I'm tripping up over a couple of small but important details to do with levels/impedance which I don't fully understand. I want to incorporate comfort reverb and 0 latency hardware monitoring into my home rig as follows:

0 latency monitoring, reverb
=====================

Mic -- ART Splitcom (isolated out) -- DMP3 (ch2) -- Alesis Picoverb -- 40 db attenuator (line out to mic in) -- Art My monitor -- Headphone outs)

DAW backing track to Monitor Mix
==========================

ADI-2 (head out) --(something?) -- ART MyMonitor (line in)


Mic Recording
==========

(Mic)------ ART Splitcom (direct out)-- DMP3 (ch1) --ADI-2 --- M-Audio 2496


My questions are do I need the attenuator between the Picoverb (line out) and ART MyMonitor (mic in)? Also do I need an impedance transformer between the head out of the ADi-2 and the ART line in? Or do I just play with the volume control on the ADI-2?

Many thanks!
Shaolin is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Richard Crowley's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Location: Portland OR USA
Posts: 1,516

Yes, getting from line level (even consumer -10db line-level) to mic-level requires attenuation.

Going from "headphone out" into line-level can very often be done directly. Impedance is not an issue here, only signal levels. And often the signal levels are compatible enough that no extra interface trickery is necessary. Note, however, that generally speaking "headphone-out" is not as "clean" an output as the main line-level output from most audio equipment. It is certainly sufficient for monitoring, but not as the "main path" for your finished product.
Richard Crowley is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 665

Thread Starter
Thanks for the clarification, much appreciated. I should be all set now!
Shaolin is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
UPS and iso transformer LX3 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 9 31st May 2009 02:48 PM
Is there a big difference between a Goldpoint attenuator and a SPL Volume 2? Marrone High end 4 20th August 2007 10:46 PM
D.I. transformers? nathanvacha Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 1 3rd July 2007 05:21 AM
passive attenuation rxfit06 Mastering forum 31 2nd February 2007 03:02 PM
Hosa input attenuator? celticrogues So much gear, so little time! 10 9th January 2007 12:29 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:18 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.