Adding Tape Outs to Tascam Portastudio 414 mkII - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum

Adding Tape Outs to Tascam Portastudio 414 mkII
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th August 2012   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2

Thread Starter
Adding Tape Outs to Tascam Portastudio 414 mkII

I would like to add individual tape outputs to my Tascam Portastudio 414 mkII so that I can easily transfer a pile of old 4-track tape sessions to my DAW, playing back each track into its own individual output which is connected to an individual channel input on my audio interface.

Based on the unit's block diagram on pages 39-40 of the manual, it looks like I should be able to jump off the individual tape output lines coming from the tape heads/dbx unit with nothing but wires to a group of RCA jacks, sharing a common ground wire among them all. The 'Sync Out' jack to play tape sync signals seems to be built the same way.

Are there any issues or gotchas with this approach? I don't have a mature understanding of electronics, but know enough to read diagrams and follow clear instructions.

Any info or guidance on this would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance!
WaxAegis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th August 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Area 51, NV, USA
Posts: 1,600

The (4) outputs from the DBX module labeled "TAPE1,2,3, &4" will have the (4) channels of audio, but the signal level may not be enough to drive your DAW interface, and the output impedance at those points may not be low enough to drive cables and your DAW inputs without seeing some signal degradation.

A schematic would be helpful since the block diagram does not give any actual circuit details.

The block diagram does show two amplifiers after the mix bus for the main line outs as well as the monitor amps for the phones and monitor outputs. That implies that more gain may be needed to reach reasonable "line" levels.

Even with a schematic, it may be difficult to determine the signal level at the DBX module output points. If you have access to an oscilloscope, you should measure the signal level at those internal output points. If it's an appropriate level, you could always try patching them through RCA jacks to your interface line inputs (probably setting the inputs up for -10dBv levels), but a better way to do it would be to put in a set of op-amp "voltage followers" as buffers/line drivers. If the internal signal is too low, those same buffers could be set to provide 10 or 20 dB of gain as needed.


Another possible set of "output taps" would be the output of the amplifiers immediate following the EQ stages (feeding the pan pots and the Effect-1 pot labeled "DIRECT-1,2,3, & 4). The signal level may be higher there and the output impedance may be lower. (Keep the EQ "flat" if you use those points)

The biggest potential problem of just bringing out the internal signal points is that if they are being driven by a moderately high circuit impedance, the signal will be degraded by the output cable capacitance and the input load of your interface. Those same points are also inputs to the internal (4) track mixer. so if they are not isolated by a buffer amp, you also risk adding noise to the internal mix going to the main outputs.

Hope this makes sense.
Lotus 7 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th August 2012   #3
Gear interested
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 2

Thread Starter
I follow your response enough to conclude that doing it the 'right' way is probably not worth the effort and I'd rather not mess with it

Nevertheless, thanks for the information.
WaxAegis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 30th August 2012   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 7

here's a crappy solution!

pan channel 1 hard left and use the left out
pan channels 2 and 3 hard right and send each one to either aux out
then use the sync out for channel 4

I don't know if this would work, but you don't have mess with the unit to try it out
themagickite is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Anyone know why bouncing digitally from Protools to digital tape sounds better? Riddler So much gear, so little time! 18 30th January 2013 12:41 AM
How To Break in TV Ad Composing DavidG79 Music For Picture 27 13th June 2012 07:41 PM
DSD Convertor Quality: Korg MR1000 or Tascam DVRA1000 which is best? mosrite Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 6 14th April 2008 02:42 AM
Tascam ATR 80 karibu So much gear, so little time! 11 5th November 2007 09:39 AM
Tascam dm24 or MOTU HD192 -as core studio iflyinmymind Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 21 27th August 2004 03:05 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:31 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.