BUF-03 versus LM6172 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum

BUF-03 versus LM6172
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 27th July 2012   #1
Gear addict
 
lame pseudonym's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 352

Thread Starter
BUF-03 versus LM6172

Here we have two chips that have been recommended for line outputs: The BUF03 in a Stereophile article (or its AD811 successor), and the LM6172 frequently mentioned here.

Does anyone have any experience with these, such that they could comparatively describe their sound? I'm a fan of modest bandlimiting so neither one would be running full altitude.

The LM has the advantage of experience in this group, the BUFs have the advantage that I have a couple.

Anyone?

Thanks

LP
lame pseudonym is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2012   #2
Gear Guru
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,257
My Recordings/Credits

One is a dual opamp and the other is a current buffer.
Jim Williams is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 28th July 2012   #3
Gear addict
 
lame pseudonym's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 352

Thread Starter
Does it matter if I'm building a low-gain or no-gain line driver?
I wouldn't think that it does, as long as I apply either one correctly...

LP
lame pseudonym is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2012   #4
Gear nut
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 84

Well, my first question would be what is it exactly that you are trying to do. A line driver is something different than just a line output so I'm confused as to what you really want to know. Any chip will supply a line output, but a line driver is designed specifically to drive a "long" line or a long cable, so you first need to define the application and then choose the chip that will get that job done.

"Does it matter if I'm building a low-gain or no-gain line driver?"

Does "what" matter? Everything matters, but again, it depends on the application. If gain is an issue then it matters; if it's not an issue then it doesn't matter.

If your issue is that you have a couple of Buf's laying around and you want to build some type of line driver out of them then you should study up on line drivers to see what kind of specifications they have. Normally, a "line driver" can supply much more current than a "normal", for lack of a better term, chip or circuit. Some chips can provide upwards of 20mA of current, whereas some can only supply a couple of mA. A line driver can supply upwards of 100mA of current, question is, do you need that much?

A "buffer" can also supply a "high" output current and can also drive a long cable, but the first thing that comes to mind when I think "buffer" is when I need to drive multiple inputs (or provide multiple outputs) and don't want to load down my existing output.

If your question is about the sound quality of these two chips: BUF-03 versus LM6172, then I would say that the buf has probably not been optimized for audio applications. That is not to say that it won't sound good. If I had an "old school" audio stage that couldn't supply enough output current, then adding a Buf03 or some other one, could be an option to consider - it certainly won't degrade the existing sound that I already have.

So, basically, a buffer chip is a specialized device designed to add current drive capability to an existing design - not necessarily an audio design - but the 6172 has probably been designed from the ground up to handle audio applications.

So, the list goes on and on depending on what you need to do, so first figure that out and then post back.
Vitalis is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 29th July 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5,660

Hi
The Buf chip although functional as a 'unity gain' current amplifier has relatively poor distortion characteristics and is normally used in conjunction with a 'low power' high performance op amp which corrects the distortion using feedback giving a composite circuit with good performance and high power output capability.
Matt S
__________________
Matt S
www.mseaudio.co.uk
Matt Syson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2012   #6
Gear addict
 
lame pseudonym's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 352

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matt Syson View Post
Hi
The Buf chip although functional as a 'unity gain' current amplifier has relatively poor distortion characteristics and is normally used in conjunction with a 'low power' high performance op amp which corrects the distortion using feedback giving a composite circuit with good performance and high power output capability.
Matt S
Damn. That's a good answer.

LP
lame pseudonym is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd August 2012   #7
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 5,660

Hi
ALL devices that produce 'voltage gain' are non linear and WILL distort. There are various techniques you can use to minimise this, many involving negative feedback. This can be 'per device, or as an overall circuit. Since a buffer has practically 'unity' gain (1) there is no real mechanism to provide feedback (although it can be argued that it has close to 100 percent feedback) but in reality to lower the distortion you need an overall EXCESS of gain for the required job, from which you then 'recycle' some of this gain to reduce distortion.
Modern Op amps with their 100dB or more gain are usually employed to have gains up to 40dB, thus allowing 60dB of 'potential' gain, to reduce distortion.
Matt S
Matt Syson is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 9th August 2012   #8
Gear addict
 
lame pseudonym's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 352

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jim Williams View Post
Look at the Bode plots. They show gain vs frequency...
If I may chime in, in support of Mr. Williams....

Back when the TL0 bi-fet opamps were still being marketed with mailings and such, I played with I think a TL072 on the guitar amp repair bench. And even with the kind of monitoring equipment you get with a guitar amp repair bench, I could clearly hear that the preamp I built sounded pretty good when it was bandlimited with a capacitor across the feedback resistor, and like a bucket of gravel when it was run without any frequency limits.

Years later I met Mr. Burdick from Benchmark Media and he told me what was going on. There's a pretty good explanation out there in webland, clipped from an Audio Amateur interview article with Mr. Burdick.
lame pseudonym is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Waldorf LARGO vsti versus Largo Hardware synth...anyone? nightsymbol Music Computers 3 27th July 2012 08:30 PM
Reverb versus Delay versus Echo? hduncan So much gear, so little time! 1 12th February 2008 08:13 AM
Aurora GTQC versus API 7600 versus Portico 5032 w/5043 trashman High end 1 10th June 2007 02:59 AM
Radial J48 versus JDI--active versus passive DI feyshay So much gear, so little time! 1 21st December 2005 05:38 AM
Senheiser 421 versus 521 versus 441, what's the difference ? andre tchmil So much gear, so little time! 11 18th October 2003 01:59 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:26 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.