Is this HFE testing circuit worth a damn? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum


Is this HFE testing circuit worth a damn?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th January 2012   #1
Gear addict
 
a zombie's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 438

Thread Starter
Is this HFE testing circuit worth a damn?

Just built this little tester circuit:

Cheap Transistor "Beta" Meter - RED - Page141

trying to test the HFE on some 2n7308's and I get only 0.004A (4mA) when I run the test. so does this mean I have a HFE of 400?

I can't really differentiate between different transistors because the current is so small that my meter (Fluke 115) doesn't have any resolution below 1ma.

Maybe I'm doing something completely wrong...
__________________
www.customanalogservices.com
a zombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
JohnRoberts's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Hickory, MS
Posts: 2,046

If you switch the VOM to volts and put a 1K resistor across the two leads, 4 mA will make 4 volts.

So 1 mA, 1V etc....

JR
__________________
John Roberts
www.CircularScience.com
JohnRoberts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2012   #3
Gear nut
 
henryf's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 123

I think the first thing you have to consider is whether those transistors are bipolar or FETs. If they are P-channel MOSFETs, such as the 2N7308 made by Harris, then yes, you are doing something completely wrong.
henryf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2012   #4
Gear addict
 
a zombie's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 438

Thread Starter
oops, I mean 2N3708.

I need to choose the ones with the highest HFE for an mnats 1176, I tried JR's suggestion of the 1k resistor and it seems to be working.

I don't think I'm getting actual HFE values but at least I can determine which ones have the most gain.
a zombie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th January 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
JohnRoberts's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Hickory, MS
Posts: 2,046

Ideally you will get more representative selecting for beta by testing at the base current (and Vc-e) you plan to operate these devices at in the application. Also be careful when handling them that you don't warm the parts with your fingers to different temps as that could make a subtle difference in beta.

Probably close enough for government work. I have pretty much avoided any design that requires matched or selected parts. For the last 20+ years. When I was designing at Peavey even using a trimpot was a sign of weak** design. Since you have to depend on the factory to set the trimmer correctly.

JR

PS I did inherit a 4tr cassette deck that had so many set up trims that it took an experienced factory tech hours to accomplish.
JohnRoberts is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
what amp is this? wilco/mavis/drake rehearsal dabigfrog So much gear, so little time! 2 13th January 2012 08:09 PM
what synth is this and what isit worth? idealflaw Electronic Music Instruments & Electronic Music Production 3 14th May 2011 05:58 PM
Is this going too damn far? nukmusic So much gear, so little time! 57 15th June 2008 05:07 PM
PA2V2 headphone amp - how is this circuit? jackrabbit Geekslutz forum 1 11th October 2007 05:43 PM
i dont trust it. why is this laptop so damn cheap?? thijs noisia Music computers 2 20th February 2006 11:22 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:41 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.