oscilloscope - Page 2 - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum


oscilloscope

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 14th January 2012   #31
._.
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: local group, virgo supercluster
Posts: 332

Quote:
Originally Posted by tINY View Post

Are you assuming that a 1GS/S, 8 bit converter can only resolve 45dB of dynamic range at 100kHz???

If so, you really need to read up on delta/sigma converters, oversampling, and noise shaping.


You tell me. I just read 2 pdfs about noise in digital scopes written by Agilent. And it seems you can decrease noise by 30dB by oversampling, using bigger buffers, and averaging, but at least one of the methods will essentially remove the noise you are trying to measure so I fail to see how that will be useful.

It also seems like about 190 microvolts is the lowest noise in some good scopes. However that was at almost 300 mhz bandwidth. Not reduced.

And it appears like very good preams have about 1 microvolt of noise, if I understand the measurements correctly. A preamp with -127dBu of noise (3.46e-7 V or 0.000000346 V/ 0,35 microvolts), is not uncommon if you are building some kind of kit, I have seen schematics even better than that.

It looks like a good USB scope is more useful than stand alone one, since you have a real computer doing the calculations for you.

And if you can oversample, average and things like that in a stand alone scope you can surely do just the same with a USB scope to decrease the noise. It looks like a 16 bit scope is better for audio at least.

I think the 16 bit Picoscope looks good, it only takes 20 volts though on 1:1 and its only 5mhz. Maybe one of those special high voltage differential probes could be useful so you can measure mains voltage.

Maybe that and a good multimeter is a good start? Maybe one of those Benchmark interfaces too? Personally I would choose that over a single 500-1000mhz scope costing the same as all those things combined. It just seems more useful.

However (somewhat) good audio gear has been around for at least 50 years so I guess you can do it with only an analog crt scope, analog signal generator and an analog multimeter too if you know how to use them properly.
__________________
How brostep is really made.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Circuitt View Post
I just set auto quantize on and roll my face on the keyboard to make music, it's awesome
._. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2012   #32
Lives for gear
 
The Real MC's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: secluded tranquil country
Posts: 2,031

Yeah you thought boutique mic preamps were expensive?

'Scope inputs have a preamp. They have to impart zero nada color on the signal while amplifying it by 60dB - all without any reactive loading on the test point. For digital scopes oversampling is the norm. Signal integrity is imperative on 'scopes.
__________________
You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink it. But lead a horse to liquor...
The Real MC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2012   #33
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 7,120

Thread Starter
here's a cool use for a scope

robertshaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th January 2012   #34
Gear maniac
 
radeng's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 151

That Pong breadboard is insane!
radeng is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2012   #35
Gear Guru
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,230

Quote:
Originally Posted by ._. View Post
You tell me. I just read 2 pdfs about noise in digital scopes written by Agilent. And it seems you can decrease noise by 30dB by oversampling, using bigger buffers, and averaging, but at least one of the methods will essentially remove the noise you are trying to measure so I fail to see how that will be useful.

It also seems like about 190 microvolts is the lowest noise in some good scopes. However that was at almost 300 mhz bandwidth. Not reduced.

And it appears like very good preams have about 1 microvolt of noise, if I understand the measurements correctly. A preamp with -127dBu of noise (3.46e-7 V or 0.000000346 V/ 0,35 microvolts), is not uncommon if you are building some kind of kit, I have seen schematics even better than that....


Are you really concerned with the noise in the 1MHz band on your audio preamp? 10MHz? 100MHz?

It may also be worthwhile to calculate the thernal noise of a 20kHz bandwidth on a 200 or 600 ohm impedance...


Johnson–Nyquist noise - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2012   #36
._.
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Location: local group, virgo supercluster
Posts: 332

No of course not, and even less at 1ghz, 30-40khz is enough fo me. The thermal noise of those resistors should be way down there at -130dBu.

I found some pdfs for those that are interested. Can't link them directly but I can link the searches though.

Search Results: Home | Agilent

"Understanding the Right Metrics to use when Evaluating Oscilloscope Quality"
or "Oscilloscopes and ENOB"

Search Results: Home | Agilent

Evaluating Oscilloscope Vertical Noise Characteristics

Search Results: Home | Agilent

Spectral Analysis Using a Deep-Memory Oscilloscope Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)
or Spectral Analysis Using a Deep Memory Oscilloscope FFT (AN 1383-1))


To the document search page
Document Library: Test & Measurement | Agilent


Haven't read these 3 yet.

Evaluating Oscilloscopes for Best Waveform Update Rates

Evaluating Oscilloscope Bandwidths for Your Application

Evaluating Oscilloscope Sample Rates vs. Sampling Fidelity
._. is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2012   #37
Lives for gear
 
The Real MC's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: secluded tranquil country
Posts: 2,031

Quote:
Originally Posted by radeng View Post
That Pong breadboard is insane!
Yeah I would never breadboard anything 1/3 that size. And it was a college lab project. I wouldn't let anyone NEAR that breadboard for fear of a "misplaced" wire.

They put the 'scope in XY mode and generated the voltages to display the elements of the game. Interesting.
The Real MC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2012   #38
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 182

Quote:
Originally Posted by The Real MC View Post
They put the 'scope in XY mode and generated the voltages to display the elements of the game. Interesting.
Yes, is a tribute as videogames began. Tennis name, I think, near '60, on a oscilloscope, incidentally, not chance only to entertain visitors of any lab.

The only vintage (quad vintage) gear that I have it's my early'70 DIY Tennis kit for CRT screens. Controls made with Telefunken TV spare knobs & pots, into a kodak film case....yehaa I am little oldy

Was my first videogame, pure DIY, and was very inspired to me, to avoid analog electronics and take computer science degree .

EDITED===

I found it!!

Tennis for two, wikipedia... of course:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tennis_for_Two

Last edited by manzini; 16th January 2012 at 11:24 PM.. Reason: I found it!!
manzini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th January 2012   #39
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Boston
Posts: 7,120

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by ._. View Post
No of course not, and even less at 1ghz, 30-40khz is enough fo me. The thermal noise of those resistors should be way down there at -130dBu.

I found some pdfs for those that are interested. Can't link them directly but I can link the searches though.

Search Results: Home | Agilent

"Understanding the Right Metrics to use when Evaluating Oscilloscope Quality"
or "Oscilloscopes and ENOB"

Search Results: Home | Agilent

Evaluating Oscilloscope Vertical Noise Characteristics

Search Results: Home | Agilent

Spectral Analysis Using a Deep-Memory Oscilloscope Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)
or Spectral Analysis Using a Deep Memory Oscilloscope FFT (AN 1383-1))


To the document search page
Document Library: Test & Measurement | Agilent


Haven't read these 3 yet.

Evaluating Oscilloscopes for Best Waveform Update Rates

Evaluating Oscilloscope Bandwidths for Your Application

Evaluating Oscilloscope Sample Rates vs. Sampling Fidelity
+1
good links
robertshaw is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
usb oscilloscope vs. sound card oscilloscope for synth calibration? Patrick_K Geekslutz forum 11 4th September 2009 11:05 AM
any good software oscilloscope programs? dj_who Geekslutz forum 2 31st May 2006 08:02 AM
Software Oscilloscope Scott Alger Music computers 1 29th November 2005 08:57 PM
Oscilloscope Questions cannikin So much gear, so little time! 14 30th August 2004 10:52 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:40 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.