Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Neve / SSL / API console summing vs. summing box summing Shaman High end 84 18th June 2008 05:20 AM
Summing Box VS Summing In The Box neveguydusty High end 4 6th August 2006 09:20 AM
Summing Box vaesion Music computers 0 12th March 2005 04:57 PM
DIY M/S box Boby Stoica Geekslutz forum 6 21st November 2004 02:37 AM
DIY Summing Mixer Part 2 Saudade So much gear, so little time! 15 20th June 2004 05:31 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 30th March 2006, 07:31 PM   #1
Slaytex
Lives for gear
 
Slaytex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 950
DIY summing box?

Can anyone guide me in the right direction as how to build a passive summing box? Anyone have a schematic? I'm sure it's pretty basic, I would love to stick my head under the hood of a Folcrom.
Thanks.
__________________
Clayton Yunt
Full Volume Sound
Full Volume Sound
Slaytex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2006, 08:03 PM   #2
Matt Syson
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,489
Hi
The essence is simply a bunch of resistors. Then you presumably want channels to be switchable so you need some switches. Then you want sockets so you can plug stuff in, then you want a box to make it look pretty, then you have a Folcrum.
To take it back to basics and you have a DAW using PT / Tascam wiring on a SubD25 all you actually need is a sub D connector, a bunch of resistors and an XLR plug or two to stick it into your mic amp input. This will work and it is cheap but you don't get the switches, extra sockets to do more exciting things, or a sexy box. The choice is yours!
Matt S
__________________
Matt S
www.mseaudio.co.uk
Matt Syson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2006, 08:29 PM   #3
Slaytex
Lives for gear
 
Slaytex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 950
Cool thanks for the reply. I did some googling and found this:
http://www.forsselltech.com/8chsum_2.pdf
Easy as pie. I do not care for the switches as I will be sending everything out in stereo pairs.
Thanks.
__________________
Clayton Yunt
Full Volume Sound
Full Volume Sound
Slaytex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2006, 10:17 PM   #4
Matt Syson
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,489
Hi
I am not wishing to say anything at all negative about the Folcrom unit or anyone else's for that matter. The simple design in the link has limitations in that disconnecting one or more inputs will affect the mix level but this is a fully workable solution. I had wondered about making one up on a cheap patchfield using the break contacts to short the inputs if unused thus keeping the levels constant. I don't want or need one personally so I haven't bothered.
Matt S
__________________
Matt S
www.mseaudio.co.uk
Matt Syson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2006, 11:55 PM   #5
ulysses
Lives for gear
 
ulysses's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Minneapolis and Wiesbaden
Posts: 979
That's one big difference between the circuit shown in that schematic and the one contained in the Folcrom. Switches are necessary if you ever want to vary the number of channels in use or their assignments to the left and/or right busses. Otherwise, leaving unused channels floating will affect the remaining channels in use. When you start adding switches, the parts cost and difficulty of assembly start to go way up. Without them, the usability of the circuit is severely limited. If one person is going to use it one way all the time for their own specific needs, this isn't a problem - just build it how you're going to use it. If your plans change though, you'll have to get out the soldering iron and rework it.
__________________
Justin Ulysses Morse
Roll Music Systems
Minneapolis, MN

The RMS5A7 Tubule is here.

"“I like paying taxes. With them I buy civilization.”
- Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes
ulysses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006, 12:49 AM   #6
Jason Poulin
Lives for gear
 
Jason Poulin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Sudbury, On. Canada
Posts: 1,686
http://gearslutz.com/board/showthrea...t=roll+summing



it's a good one.



Jason
__________________
most important gear I own are my ears!

visit my band www.apparatusmusic.com
www.myspace.com/apparatusnumetal
Jason Poulin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2006, 09:27 AM   #7
Matt Syson
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,489
If you can work out which end of an iron is hot you coule make up a couple of 'mixers' with say 7 into 1 mix and 1 direct out on 1 Dsub and the same for a second to give you a stereo mix and 2 direct outs on a 16 channel system. It's cheap enough to make a few variants which would be fine for the 'fixed' installation. Don't like it, just unplug and do something else!
Matt S
__________________
Matt S
www.mseaudio.co.uk
Matt Syson is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0