Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 5th February 2006, 12:17 AM   #1
softwareguy
Lives for gear
 
softwareguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 579
Transformers: Is Bigger Better?

This question comes from my limited knowledge of EE, which is almost entirely based in maintaining and trying to understand my old guitar amplifiers.

My question is, is it always better to have a big, powerful tranny in play? I know it will support bass information better, but I keep thinking about the sound/desirability of Fender Supers and Fender Pro's, which have much smaller output tranny's than the Fender Twins/Showman line (even considering the power differential). The Showman is a wonderful bass amp, but this circuit never develops the transformer saturation that a Fender Super or Pro does, and as a result, it never has the same compression, sweetness, and midrange richness that those amps attain when dealing with higher frequency material such as guitar (think of a Fender Twin vs. a Super). Is the output tranny on a preamp analogous? Should I be trying to get some pre's that are useful for "full range" like a Showman and others that might get squishy on bass but are really amazing for mid and high frequency material? Do preamp designers ever consider such "limitations" to be desirable?

Thanks for your thoughts.
softwareguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 04:57 AM   #2
David Kulka
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Posts: 855
"Bigger" specs are usually better, as transformers frequently run out of iron and go into clipping. A bigger footprint or heavier package isn't necessarily better -- it depends on what's inside. As for whether transformer clipping or compression adds to sound or tone I would say "no, it's more the opposite".

(Some might disagree, though calling distortion "a desirable artifact" would seem to undo the persuit of quality.)

If you're asking about power transformers, then it's a whole other question.
__________________
http://studioelectronics.biz

Service & Restoration of UREI dbx Eventide Marshall AMS Tube Gear and more
David Kulka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 05:41 AM   #3
Tim Farrant
Moderator
 
Tim Farrant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,012
As David points out, the size depends on the type of metal used for the core. Older metals meant bigger transformers to acheive a similar output level before saturation compared to the modern core types in use today. Most transformers will saturate at low frequencies first, hence the "warmth" that is actually low freq harmonic distortion. But yes, generally speaking, a bigger trnaformer will handle more level before saturation.

Cheers
Tim.
__________________
"Opinions are like arse holes - everybody has one." Dirty Harry (Clint Eastwood)

Visit Buzz Audio
Tim Farrant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 06:43 AM   #4
softwareguy
Lives for gear
 
softwareguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 579
Thanks for your input, guys. I guess what I'm really asking is not whether better transformer specs make for more accurate sound, but whether there aren't some instances where the saturation that takes place in transformers is desirable as a coloration. In particular, can a transformer that doesn't do as well on bass material because it saturates too soon nonetheless add a lot of richness and vibe on midrange and treble material such as guitar and voice?

And since we know that trannies saturate on low frequency material earlier, would it be possible that there could be a preamp tranny that was optimum for mid to higher level information just as the Fender Super tranny is optimum for guitar even though it saturates too rapidly for bass?

I know that the preamp ideal is DC to daylight, but as I look at how guitar amps, and particularly their trannies have evolved, it seems that there could be a case to be made for a preamp that was more deliberately limited in its optimum frequency applications.
softwareguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th February 2006, 06:55 AM   #5
softwareguy
Lives for gear
 
softwareguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 579
Maybe another analogy is to some classic gear that is not really that swift in the replication of extremely high or low material but due to whatever combination of tranny windings, rail instability, etc, brings huge mojo to everything between 100 and 10,000 cycles. It's just striking me that the tranny in particular might be an example where it is really the limitations that make the magic.
softwareguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 04:37 AM   #6
David Kulka
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Posts: 855
It's interesting that people often expect gear specs that extend from DC to microwave with near zero distortion, yet value old transformers with rather severe limitations on the high and low ends, and then push them beyond their design range. Distortion = magic?
__________________
http://studioelectronics.biz

Service & Restoration of UREI dbx Eventide Marshall AMS Tube Gear and more
David Kulka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2006, 06:47 PM   #7
softwareguy
Lives for gear
 
softwareguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 579
An important aspect of transformer "warmth" (distortion) is that it is stimulated by, and therefor tracks, the frequency of the input. EQ, by contrast, boosts or cuts a specific frequency range that remains static, whatever the input does. The frequencies added by a good-sounding transformer will always be based upon the frequency (and overtones) of the input at that moment in time and will change as the input changes.

I think that this is why transformers remain attractive to us. They can add color, richness, overtones, distortion, whatever, that tracks the musical content of the input. Kind of like an aural exciter, but much more complex and much less cheesy.

I think it is this effect that makes transformers "magic" and also why their limitations might be their most important features.
softwareguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 12:24 AM   #8
tINY
Lives for gear
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 8,855


When thinking about this, don't forget to consider hysterisis as well as saturation.....




-tINY

tINY is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 01:49 AM   #9
softwareguy
Lives for gear
 
softwareguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 579
OK, bearing in mind my limited skills, I'm guessing you mean that, even before a transformer goes into saturation, hysterisis is going to be impacting the sound transmitted by a transformer, as reflected in that transformer's BH curve. And that the BH curve for a smaller core/fewer turns/more vintage/less perfect transformer is going to show this impact earlier and more dramatically.

I'm sure I've pretty thoroughly hashed that up, but is the general idea correct? In other words that even prior to saturation, the two transformers will impact the signal differently?
softwareguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 03:11 AM   #10
tINY
Lives for gear
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 8,855


Close enough.

The upshot is even order harmonic distortion on lower frequencies and some intermodulation.



-tINY

tINY is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2006, 04:13 AM   #11
softwareguy
Lives for gear
 
softwareguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 579
Tiny,

Thanks for SCHOOLIN me! Seriously, this is exactly the kind of thing I'm looking for. So you're saying that as a result of greater hysterisis, earlier in the curve, you're going to hear more even order harmonic distortion which is, as we know, that stuff that we perceive as "sweet" sounding or "euphonic." I'm diggin it! And the fact that the transformer's response on the BH curve is frequency dependant means that the transformer will especially add this distortion in the lower frequencies, which we perceive as adding "warmth" or "grunt" or all those other ridiculous terms that we use.

Let me know if I got this all wrong, but I think I just understood something for the first time!
softwareguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do I need a BIGGER Knob?? SoLo So much gear, so little time! 23 16th June 2006 06:18 PM
Bigger Production Sound atlantis Rap + Hip Hop engineering & production 29 14th May 2006 04:33 PM
Bigger or smaller studio? Revilo High end 6 19th January 2006 02:24 PM
Stones a Bigger Bang .. was it done with Sobe So much gear, so little time! 1 27th November 2005 09:52 PM
42" Monitor and Bigger Cl passionmax So much gear, so little time! 10 2nd November 2005 01:48 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:45 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0