![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 1,339
Thread Starter | How are MDAC faders different from DCA faders?
Title sums it up. Anyone know? Thanks, -Ben B |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006 Location: Hickory, MS
Posts: 2,047
| Well MDACs were (are?) D/A convertors where the digital word controlled the divider resistance string and you could also vary the analog reference voltage to effectively multiply the reference voltage by the digital code. I don't think these were ever that useful for audio gain manipulations, but the modern digital pots or digital rheostats are similar when configured so an audio input acts like a bipolar AC reference that can be attenuated by a digital code. While these are perhaps limited in step size resolution. A DCA = Digital controlled amplifier? There are now Digitally controlled mic pres and line level stages that integrate digital pots onto IC with gain stages. I guess you could also convert a digital control word to control an analog VCA. Inside a digital console a DCA could be a simple as a line of software calling for a multiply. I would ask whomever is using that terminology to explain what they mean.. they seem like old technology apples and new technology oranges. DCA may mean different things in different contexts (Dig controlled analog hardware vs, all digital domain hardware). JR |
| | |
| | #3 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Aug 2007 Location: USA
Posts: 1,339
Thread Starter | Quote:
-Ben B | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2004 Location: UK
Posts: 4,822
|
Hi There are crossover devices from MDAC to DCA (digitally controlled attenuators) and as John says, the term DCA could mean a variety of techniques from some relays with digital control varying gain or amplification (if in the feedback loop or not) to a D/A converter driving a VCA (voltage controlled amplifier). I believe the MDAC was a 'digital' device in that it would scale in values 1,2,4,8,16 (etc) whereas devices such as Dallas DS1305(not sure of numbers!) use 'log' weighted resistor strings to have 'dB' or half dB steps. I can think of several ways that Digital control of analogue audio could be done but it is down to the marketing department to highlight what is used in any given piece of gear. Old desk designs used to have DC grouping before full 'automation' running against timecode for example. Matt S |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| So I want faders.....but which ones? | Andysw | So much gear, so little time! | 62 | 24th February 2009 05:57 PM |
| Automated Faders vs Manual Faders | grobichaud | So much gear, so little time! | 3 | 1st February 2009 08:26 PM |
| Talk to me about faders - reviews of different faders, favorites?, etc | 666666 | High end | 3 | 9th October 2007 11:52 PM |
| Faders or No Faders with Summing Mixer? | HudHudson | So much gear, so little time! | 5 | 1st March 2007 01:57 AM |
| Faders??? | dumbleator | Geekslutz forum | 12 | 27th September 2005 04:11 AM |
| |