How are MDAC faders different from DCA faders? - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum


How are MDAC faders different from DCA faders?

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 7th January 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
Ben B's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,339

Thread Starter
How are MDAC faders different from DCA faders?

Title sums it up. Anyone know?

Thanks,
-Ben B
Ben B is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
JohnRoberts's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Hickory, MS
Posts: 2,047

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben B View Post
Title sums it up. Anyone know?

Thanks,
-Ben B
Well MDACs were (are?) D/A convertors where the digital word controlled the divider resistance string and you could also vary the analog reference voltage to effectively multiply the reference voltage by the digital code. I don't think these were ever that useful for audio gain manipulations, but the modern digital pots or digital rheostats are similar when configured so an audio input acts like a bipolar AC reference that can be attenuated by a digital code. While these are perhaps limited in step size resolution.

A DCA = Digital controlled amplifier? There are now Digitally controlled mic pres and line level stages that integrate digital pots onto IC with gain stages. I guess you could also convert a digital control word to control an analog VCA. Inside a digital console a DCA could be a simple as a line of software calling for a multiply.

I would ask whomever is using that terminology to explain what they mean.. they seem like old technology apples and new technology oranges. DCA may mean different things in different contexts (Dig controlled analog hardware vs, all digital domain hardware).

JR
__________________
John Roberts
www.CircularScience.com
JohnRoberts is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2010   #3
Lives for gear
 
Ben B's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Location: USA
Posts: 1,339

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnRoberts View Post
Well MDACs were (are?) D/A convertors where the digital word controlled the divider resistance string and you could also vary the analog reference voltage to effectively multiply the reference voltage by the digital code. I don't think these were ever that useful for audio gain manipulations, but the modern digital pots or digital rheostats are similar when configured so an audio input acts like a bipolar AC reference that can be attenuated by a digital code. While these are perhaps limited in step size resolution.

A DCA = Digital controlled amplifier? There are now Digitally controlled mic pres and line level stages that integrate digital pots onto IC with gain stages. I guess you could also convert a digital control word to control an analog VCA. Inside a digital console a DCA could be a simple as a line of software calling for a multiply.

I would ask whomever is using that terminology to explain what they mean.. they seem like old technology apples and new technology oranges. DCA may mean different things in different contexts (Dig controlled analog hardware vs, all digital domain hardware).

JR
I'm speaking in terms of their implementation into console automation systems. The faders in the AWS 900, for example, are reportedly MDACs. I've seen DCA's (Digitally Controlled Attenuators/Digitally Controlled Amplifiers) utilized in older automation and fader grouping systems, such as some of the Yamaha live sound boards.

-Ben B
Ben B is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 7th January 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 4,822

Hi
There are crossover devices from MDAC to DCA (digitally controlled attenuators) and as John says, the term DCA could mean a variety of techniques from some relays with digital control varying gain or amplification (if in the feedback loop or not) to a D/A converter driving a VCA (voltage controlled amplifier).
I believe the MDAC was a 'digital' device in that it would scale in values 1,2,4,8,16 (etc) whereas devices such as Dallas DS1305(not sure of numbers!) use 'log' weighted resistor strings to have 'dB' or half dB steps.
I can think of several ways that Digital control of analogue audio could be done but it is down to the marketing department to highlight what is used in any given piece of gear.
Old desk designs used to have DC grouping before full 'automation' running against timecode for example.
Matt S
__________________
Matt S
www.mseaudio.co.uk
Matt Syson is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
So I want faders.....but which ones? Andysw So much gear, so little time! 62 24th February 2009 05:57 PM
Automated Faders vs Manual Faders grobichaud So much gear, so little time! 3 1st February 2009 08:26 PM
Talk to me about faders - reviews of different faders, favorites?, etc 666666 High end 3 9th October 2007 11:52 PM
Faders or No Faders with Summing Mixer? HudHudson So much gear, so little time! 5 1st March 2007 01:57 AM
Faders??? dumbleator Geekslutz forum 12 27th September 2005 04:11 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:59 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.