![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| There is only one Joined: Jun 2002 Location: asheville NC
Posts: 5,260
Thread Starter | running a mult w/o imedpance matching/quality loss
im setting up a studio to track a new album and have been thinking about my setup for it. i track fully in the DAW and will be using outboard preamps for the session along with some other kinky gear. BUT the issue of monitoring during tracking has come up and i was thinking about dragging a behringer board [flame on, i dont care] strictly for running stuff to headphone distro [furman more me system] and to run output to a webcast we are thinking about doing for the tracking session. so i was wondering.... if i have a patchbay that the preamps are running into with them "normalled" into the ADC's... can i simply run the other side of the line in out to the boards inputs to monitor off of and create submixes on for the band without affecting the signals sent to the convertors?
__________________ "i must invent my own systems or else be enslaved by other men's'" william blake __________________________ email: barrett [at] alphajerk [dot] com |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jul 2004 Location: Orygun
Posts: 10,233
| Basically, yes. The high impedance of the board and converter inputs will not load the low impedance output of the pre-amp. If you have obsolete pre-amps with transformer coupled outputs expecting to see a 600 ohm balanced load, you might see some wierdness. Adding a second high-impedance input to this won't change it, though. -tINY |
| | |
| | #3 |
| There is only one Joined: Jun 2002 Location: asheville NC
Posts: 5,260
Thread Starter |
so no deleterious effects in doing this? last thing i want would be to compromise what im feeding in just to monitor.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2005 Location: Oklahoma City
Posts: 1,818
|
You should be able to mult one line level source to several "bridging" line inputs with no problems. I'm assuming everything involved has balanced I/O. Bri |
| | |
| | #5 |
| There is only one Joined: Jun 2002 Location: asheville NC
Posts: 5,260
Thread Starter |
yes, all balanced. whew, at least one idea is going right this week for the project. now i am remembering why i dont do temporary studio setups but its still fun despite the headaches.
|
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2004 Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 562
|
There's a good discussion that touches on what you're doing going on here: http://acapella.harmony-central.com/...readid=1008291 Give it a look. Paul |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Patchbay Splitting => Quality loss? | vls | So much gear, so little time! | 13 | 15th June 2009 06:50 AM |
| FL studio transfer to protools quality loss | optikstrange | Music computers | 3 | 18th February 2007 03:14 AM |
| running cubase WHILE running other programs: doable? | joemail75 | Music computers | 9 | 20th May 2006 03:14 PM |
| Nuendo Running On OS 'Vista' vs. Pro Tools|HD Running On 'Tiger'. | Rob G | Music computers | 4 | 12th December 2005 04:40 AM |
| Pro Tools: Upsampling From 48k to 96k Quality Loss? | Perspectrum | Music computers | 1 | 25th February 2004 11:22 AM |
| |