Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > The Forums > Geekslutz forum

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Beyer M88 in the kick drum - do I need an inline pad? - which one is best? Jake Holland So much gear, so little time! 13 10th June 2008 02:50 AM
High quality in-line mic attenuator/pad? danbronson So much gear, so little time! 2 13th May 2008 12:15 AM
high quality eq au rodge Music computers 16 30th March 2008 07:30 PM
Does a resistor inline PAD influences the audio quality? MicSlut666 So much gear, so little time! 6 5th August 2007 01:34 PM
ATTY or Inline Pad - Any difference? musictech So much gear, so little time! 7 29th January 2007 05:08 AM

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 24th June 2008, 12:29 AM   #1
Mulmany
Gear interested
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13
Resistor % for High Quality inline Pad

Does anyone know whether a 1k Ohm 5% resistor will adversely affect the balanced input circuit?

So if you have a +/- 50 ohm margin on two resistors on pin 3 and pin 2 of an inline pad, will it created any phase/amplitude issues at the balanced line input circuit?

Basically how precise of a resistor is needed for a HIGH QUALITY pad?
Mulmany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 01:22 AM   #2
paully
Lives for gear
 
paully's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 538
You should get the answer on this page Goldpoint Level Controls . You need close tolerance for noise cancellation.

Best, Paul
__________________
WADAYAKNOW.. For the first time in my life, I'm wrong again!
paully is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 03:07 AM   #3
Mulmany
Gear interested
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13
Mmm

thats close to what I need. So it would be a 1k Ohm @ 0.1%, 25ppm.
Mulmany is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 04:27 AM   #4
David Kulka
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Burbank, CA, USA
Posts: 707
Chances are, the gear on either end of the pads will probably have balance specs way worse than .1%. The resistors will not be the weak link in the chain, most designers would be comfortable with 1% tolerance.
__________________
http://studioelectronics.biz

Service & Restoration of UREI dbx Eventide Marshall AMS Tube Gear and more
David Kulka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 11:31 AM   #5
Francis Vaughan
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 537
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Kulka View Post
Chances are, the gear on either end of the pads will probably have balance specs way worse than .1%. The resistors will not be the weak link in the chain, most designers would be comfortable with 1% tolerance.
In some metrics yes, but in others no. Transformer based systems will present a naturally balanced setup that will be clearly degraded by 1% tolerance in a pad.

Actively driven output stages typically have close to zero output impedance - and so the absolute variation of impedance they have will be vanishing, so again, the tolerance of the pad resistors will make a difference. Where you may see some variation may be in some pre-amps - where the input impedance may be defined by only 1% tolerance components. That preamp will already be compromised due to this - with a clearly worse common mode rejection ratio than might be otherwise possible, and so a pad with loose tolerances will make less difference. But a really good pre will have good CMRR, and a close tolerance pad still important.
__________________
The night is coming, and its filled with dark surprise.
Francis Vaughan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 05:06 PM   #6
Jim Williams
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 4,311
5% resistors will degrade CMRR to 40db. 1% resistors will give -60 db CMRR. go to matched 1% to .1% and you get -80 db CMRR. Some mic pre's have CMRR better than -90 db 20~20k. Any pad less than that will degrade CMRR (common mode rejection ratio or noise immunity).

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Jim Williams is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 05:22 PM   #7
Rick Sutton
Lives for gear
 
Rick Sutton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Atascadero, CA
Posts: 1,841
I've always wondered about this......
Is it acceptable to use say 5% (or even 1%) resistors and match them up in pairs by measuring their resistance with a Fluke digtal VOM? Are there other issues beyond the original resistance?
Thanks, Rick
Rick Sutton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 05:33 PM   #8
Ethan Winer
Lives for gear
 
Ethan Winer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,805
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sutton View Post
Is it acceptable to use say 5% (or even 1%) resistors and match them up in pairs by measuring their resistance with a Fluke digtal VOM? Are there other issues beyond the original resistance?
Yes, another issue is how the resistance might change when you heat it up while soldering. Resistors are cheap! Your time and expected results are not. If it were me I'd just buy 1% metal film resistors and be done with it.

--Ethan
__________________
www.realtraps.com
The acoustic treatment experts
-----------------------
Amazing Telecaster guitar video
Ethan Winer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 05:49 PM   #9
paully
Lives for gear
 
paully's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ethan Winer View Post
If it were me I'd just buy 1% metal film resistors and be done with it. --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
. Not to mention the inevitable dirty/corroded contacts on connectors and the rotary switch contacts. Keep the connecting wires to and from the attenuator as short as possible, use quality wire, and you should be fine with 1%.

Best, Paul
__________________
WADAYAKNOW.. For the first time in my life, I'm wrong again!
paully is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 06:12 PM   #10
Matt Syson
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: UK
Posts: 1,489
Hi
Ideally the resistors should be matched as well as possible but by the time you have your 'wonder resistors' assembled the chances are that other factors will degrade the possible CMMR response. 1 percent types are probably good enough for most tasks. If you are using a attenuator in the first place then you are already accepting a compromise. Use the attenuator at the receiving end of the cable and it will reduce the effect of any imbalance partly because the interferance will be in the 'high level' portion of the circuit. Relatively few input stages manage superb CMMR over a 20-20K bandwidth although arguably it is necessary FAR beyond this as it is your mobile phone, TV and radio signals and a whole host of 'junk' that you are trying to repel, very few input stages have immunity to this noise relying on CMRR alone.
Go for 1 percent and stop worrying, or get your multimeter out and check the match (rather than absolute value) AFTER soldering the thing together.
Matt S
__________________
Matt S
www.mseaudio.co.uk
Matt Syson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 06:12 PM   #11
Jim Williams
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 4,311
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rick Sutton View Post
I've always wondered about this......
Is it acceptable to use say 5% (or even 1%) resistors and match them up in pairs by measuring their resistance with a Fluke digtal VOM? Are there other issues beyond the original resistance?
Thanks, Rick
Yes, temp co's. That is values that drift with temperature. Most MF's are 50 ppm, some 25 ppm. Vishay bulk foils are under 1 ppm. When measuring resistors to match, be careful not to handle them first as the body heat will cause the measurement to drift. A 4 digit meter will allow you to match within 1 ohm.

Jim Williams
Audio Upgrades
Jim Williams is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 07:16 PM   #12
tINY
Lives for gear
 
tINY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 6,052


Remember that 1% resistors have a 1% tolerance over temp, voltage, current, and lifetime.

In samll-signal applications like this, you can expect better matching than 1% if pairs are pulled from the same lot and mounted in the same place.

I'd still use 1% or 0.5% metal film types, though....



-tINY

tINY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th June 2008, 08:40 PM   #13
Mulmany
Gear interested
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 13
Red Input

Thanks for the replies.

I ended up getting some mil spec 1.05k ohm .1%, 50ppm from SMC. Mouser is out untill August and I can't wait that long.

If anyone cares to know? The Red One camera cannot accept +4dbu line input and so must be padded down with home made inline pads or the relatively expensive RED cables with the pads built in.
Mulmany is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0