SRC specs for different DAW programs

audiovisceral · 15th May 2008, 10:52 AM

i use sonar, but from
SRC Comparisons

it looks like it rapes your high frequencies somehow. i don't quite get it though. should i switch to nuendo? practically, what does it all mean?

or is this all just relevant at mastering ie. record/bounce/mix in sonar ok, but don't dither down using it's internal processor?

thanks a bunch.

Lupo · 15th May 2008, 04:50 PM

The sonar graph is flat to about 20kHz and the distortions are at -170dBFS... Good enough for anything. The nuendo 3.0 graphs shows a lack of attenuation at half the final sample rate and above, which again shows up as junk on the 1kHz test, which is the aliasing that is visible as the faded lines on the sweep graph. The nuendo graph is worse than the sonar one in every respect, except for the extent of the frequency response. If you want to make music for bats, keep it at 88 or 96kHz and avoid the 44.1 conversion. :)

What it means is that sonar is not bad at SRC'ing. This only comes into play if the SRC routine is actually used. This should be left for mastering. For normal operation, the effect is naught.

Dither is used before reducing bit depth, an entirely different issue than sample rate conversion.

audiovisceral · 15th May 2008, 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lupo

The sonar graph is flat to about 20kHz and the distortions are at -170dBFS... Good enough for anything. The nuendo 3.0 graphs shows a lack of attenuation at half the final sample rate and above, which again shows up as junk on the 1kHz test, which is the aliasing that is visible as the faded lines on the sweep graph. The nuendo graph is worse than the sonar one in every respect, except for the extent of the frequency response. If you want to make music for bats, keep it at 88 or 96kHz and avoid the 44.1 conversion. :)

What it means is that sonar is not bad at SRC'ing. This only comes into play if the SRC routine is actually used. This should be left for mastering. For normal operation, the effect is naught.

Dither is used before reducing bit depth, an entirely different issue than sample rate conversion.

lol re bats. thanks. i'll stick to my daw as is.

15th May 2008, 10:52 AM	#1
audiovisceral Gear addict Join Date: Apr 2006 Posts: 482	SRC specs for different DAW programs i use sonar, but from SRC Comparisons it looks like it rapes your high frequencies somehow. i don't quite get it though. should i switch to nuendo? practically, what does it all mean? or is this all just relevant at mastering ie. record/bounce/mix in sonar ok, but don't dither down using it's internal processor? thanks a bunch.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes	Rate This Thread
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode	Rate This Thread:

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Best SRC for osx?	rtb197	Mastering forum	18	16th May 2008 08:39 AM
What is the best SRC out there ?	djanogil	Mastering forum	7	8th January 2008 01:15 AM
SRC and Dither	miditus	Mastering forum	6	26th July 2007 12:43 PM
POSSIBLE TO COPY PROGRAMS FROM OLD DAW OS DRIVE TO NEW DAW OS DRIVE?	jlotto	Music computers	9	15th February 2007 05:28 AM
Any free DAW programs ? I`ve lost my dongle !	kevinc	So much gear, so little time!	3	29th July 2006 03:30 PM

15th May 2008, 04:50 PM	#2
Lupo Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Norway Posts: 308	The sonar graph is flat to about 20kHz and the distortions are at -170dBFS... Good enough for anything. The nuendo 3.0 graphs shows a lack of attenuation at half the final sample rate and above, which again shows up as junk on the 1kHz test, which is the aliasing that is visible as the faded lines on the sweep graph. The nuendo graph is worse than the sonar one in every respect, except for the extent of the frequency response. If you want to make music for bats, keep it at 88 or 96kHz and avoid the 44.1 conversion. :) What it means is that sonar is not bad at SRC'ing. This only comes into play if the SRC routine is actually used. This should be left for mastering. For normal operation, the effect is naught. Dither is used before reducing bit depth, an entirely different issue than sample rate conversion.