![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| DIY Home Acoustics Tutorials | Samplecraze | New product alert! | 0 | 9th August 2006 03:49 PM |
| DIY HOme Acoustics Tutorial | Samplecraze | So much gear, so little time! | 8 | 11th July 2006 11:10 PM |
| DIY Skyline Diffusors | DeeDrive | So much gear, so little time! | 34 | 4th March 2006 03:52 PM |
| using LPs as diffusors | ttauri | So much gear, so little time! | 4 | 9th November 2004 04:17 PM |
| Those Attractive Wood Diffusors..... | PRS1JAZZ | High end | 7 | 15th February 2004 09:33 PM |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,170
| DIY acoustics - diffusors? At least 90% of all the DIY acoustics threads on any of the forums seem to deal with bass trapping, and almost exclusively tube traps. I can't remember ever coming across a DIY diffuser article. The most well known commercial designs, (for example: http://www.rpginc.com/products/skyline/index.htm) seem like they would be extremely labor intensive to build. Are there any less demanding diffuser designs for the DIY builder? I've got a nasty flutter echo occuring at the two parallel walls located on either side of my nearfields. As you can see on the cheesy Excel floorplan, I tried to keep the front half of the room symetrical, and that's what led to the empty parallel walls and the flutter echo. I've got to fix this before I can use the room. Thanks
__________________ steve Lexington 125 - High Resolution Location Recording lex125@pacbell.net http://www.lexington125.com |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Moderator emeritus Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 3,169
| Steve, why not just make the walls non parallel? I think that on my web site, there's a pictue of the control room that shows my approach to this. Essentially, it's 1x6's and plywood. Pretty easy (except that lifitng 4x8 plywoood that high is a pain in the butt). And it works fine. The formula that I've read to eliminate flutter echoes is 1 inch per foot; by putting plywood on the wall with one side 5 1/2 inches out (the width of a 1x6 board) and the other against the wall, I get that. The only flutter I've got in my CR is floor to cieling (in one spot) and I've got plans to fix that as time and money permit.
__________________ Dave Martin Java Jive Studio www.javajivestudio.com Cuppa Joe Records www.cuppajoerecords.com Nashville, TN |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,170
| If I wasn't already dealing with an extremely cramped space, the non-parallel wall idea would be a good option. But I'm using almost every square inch of floor space; if its not occupied by furniture or gear, its the very narrow access space to other gear or furniture. The diffusers would hang on what is now empty wall space (the ONLY empty wall space in the room, most of my furniture is floor-to-ceiling). But now that I'm back, I've got another diffuser question. We all know that to either block or absorb sound, you need mass. But is mass really necessary for diffusion? When you picture the couple of standard non-foam diffuser designs, they all incorporate many pieces of different sized wood thereby providing a randomly uneven surface. Can these blocks be made of a very lightweight wood like balsa, or any of the other light "hobbyist" woods? For example, something like this: http://www.rpginc.com/products/qrd734/index.htm Is the varied surface all that is important? (in which case balsa should be fine) Or does mass come into play somehow? Thanks.
__________________ steve Lexington 125 - High Resolution Location Recording lex125@pacbell.net http://www.lexington125.com |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Motown legend Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 5,248
| Depends on the frequency that you want to diffuse! Practically speaking, it doesn't require a massive structure to diffuse the only frequencies you can diffuse in most studio-sized spaces. Massive spaces can obviously benefit from massive structures. I've always found simple things such as bookshelves full of books and records to do about as good a job as anything for broadband diffusion. If you want to get esoteric, diffusion can be used to alter the subjective frequency response of a room's ambient field but that requires serious calculations. To me it only makes sense in an isolated, soundproof floating room where you want to make it sound acoustically larger than it really is. Finally, simple flutter-echos can be easily tamed by a small checkerboard arrangement of acoustical ceiling tiles! I recommend an empirical approach. Become a connoisseur of great sounding spaces by listening everywhere you go and noting what the good-sounding spaces have in common. A LOT of expensive studio designs sound really really bad despite the fortunes that have been spent on building them. This is because all acoustical design is an attempt to make a room sound like something other than what it really is. Great sounding rooms don't need acoustical treatment! |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,170
| I'm in complete agreement with Bob's reply. Most of my space is covered floor-to ceiling with bookcases (3) and shelving units (2). I've always been a big fan of full bookcases as low tech, high efficiency diffusors. But on either side of my listening position, I have bare walls with no room for furniture. This space must be "fixed" via specific treatment that has to hang on the wall. The good news is that I have identified the problem as flutter echo strongly centered around 350hz. (350hz is the one frequency that is a multiple of all three of my primary modes, the calcs predicted this problem and testing just confirmed it.) So, in addition to all of the "natural" diffusion that I have stuffed into the room, I need to address this specific frequency in this specific location. My first thought was a pair of 4ft x 2ft DIY diffusors, one on each of the two opposing walls. But if a 350Hz flutter echo can be fixed with just a dozen 12" x 12" tiles on each wall, that would be a MUCH easier, cheaper and faster solution.
__________________ steve Lexington 125 - High Resolution Location Recording lex125@pacbell.net http://www.lexington125.com |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,779
| Steve, > if a 350Hz flutter echo can be fixed with just a dozen 12" x 12" tiles on each wall < Absorbing completely down to 350 Hz is a bit optimistic for typical foam or fiberglass tiles, unless they're very thick. --Ethan
__________________ www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts ----------------------- Amazing Telecaster guitar video |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 132
| Hi Steve, Here's a thought. I can't find the link for the portable slats (sayers site is down), but they are easy to build, plus maybe 6 or so 6" 2X4 703 panels covered in fabric/burlap. easy to build, hang them cabinet style, mover them around to taste. Best, Dave |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Marietta GA
Posts: 132
| pic won't post. sorry - I can get it in the the browse, but can't attach? |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict | There's an article in the latest Recording magizine about a DIY absorber reflector. Also I've heard of using the cross-hatch lathe available in builder supplys and pegboard as difussors. That would certainly be a cheap fix. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,170
| Steve, > if a 350Hz flutter echo can be fixed with just a dozen 12" x 12" tiles on each wall < Absorbing completely down to 350 Hz is a bit optimistic for typical foam or fiberglass tiles, unless they're very thick. --Ethan That was what I was afraid of, but I wanted to hear what you and others thought. So, given a classic case of flutter echo due to parallel walls only 8ft apart, what is a practical, efficient solution that also looks nice and doesn't cost several hundred dollars. (I just spent a silly amount of money fixing up this little 120SF room, I really don't want to hang cardboard on my walls, but I've also just passed twice my original budget amount for room improvements - that's one very nice piece of gear that will never be purchased.) Please keep in mind that I have already crammed three seven FT tall bookcases into the room and a full height shelving unit; the room has no space for anymore "natural" diffusors. This one situation must be handled by specific acoustical treatment placed on the walls in these two locations
__________________ steve Lexington 125 - High Resolution Location Recording lex125@pacbell.net http://www.lexington125.com |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,779
| Steve, > what is a practical, efficient solution that also looks nice and doesn't cost several hundred dollars. < You want rigid fiberglass. It's a raw material that needs to be covered with fabric for appearance and to keep the fibers in place. But it's cheap. --Ethan
__________________ www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts ----------------------- Amazing Telecaster guitar video |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: uh..... Hollywood
Posts: 1,170
| You want rigid fiberglass. For trapping and/or absorbtion, 703 is my best friend, but for diffusion, too? Please explain. My problem is a classic example of flutter echo and consists predominately of 350Hz and the first harmonic (700hz). Wouldn't a typical diffusor product (or design) work fine for that type of situation? Why would rigid fiberglass be the answer? (Knowing that I already have both specific and broadband panel bass traps being built for other areas of the room. Thanks.
__________________ steve Lexington 125 - High Resolution Location Recording lex125@pacbell.net http://www.lexington125.com |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,779
| Steve, > For trapping and/or absorbtion, 703 is my best friend, but for diffusion, too? < What I meant is you need absorption, not diffusion. That room is simply too small to take good advantage of diffusion. > flutter echo ... of 350Hz < Yeah, that too. You need a pretty big diffuser to handle such a low frequency very well. --Ethan
__________________ www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts ----------------------- Amazing Telecaster guitar video |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Motown legend Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 5,248
| I think of flutter echos as being mid-range colorations. The 350 Hz. is a standing wave resulting from the room dimensions. Rigid fiberglass across the corner will help a lot. I'd find an industrial insulation dealer and buy the densest furnace insulation they'll sell you a reasonably small quantity of. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Moderator Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: New Zealand
Posts: 1,833
| Yes, absorbtion on the sidewalls and ceiling around you monitors will remove the flutter and improve you stereo imaging no end. You want to try and reduce early reflections that produce comb filtering effects and a generally bad stereo sound feild. Reflections from sufaces with a path length of 10 metres or more can be considered useful - but looks like you won't be getting many of those in that room !! Hope this helps Tim.
__________________ innovative outboard processing |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Sweden
Posts: 295
| Are there any guidelines about mixer positions? My control room is 22.5 x 18 x 9 feet. At the moment I’m sitting in the middle of the room. Where should I place my sitting chair? ![]()
__________________ http://www.mmvstudios.com |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: New Milford, CT, USA
Posts: 4,779
| Kurt, > At the moment I’m sitting in the middle of the room. < That's where the bass response is most lacking. The drawing below shows the best way to set up in a rectangular room. --Ethan
__________________ www.realtraps.com The acoustic treatment experts ----------------------- Amazing Telecaster guitar video Last edited by Ethan Winer; 6th March 2006 at 11:03 PM.. Reason: Hey, why didn't the image show as an image? |
| | |
| | #18 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 233
| Quote:
Kurt, a typical listening position in a rectangular room is set at about 38% of the rooms length from the front wall. You can see a good graphic of such here: Studio Room Graphic Get your head there, and be happy! Good luck! ![]() | |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Jax - FL
Posts: 169
| Joel: Where is the keg cooler... is that the box next to the desk thingy? Just teasing, I love that graphic's transparency effect - a lot of core concepts well illustrated. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Sweden
Posts: 295
| Thank you Ethan Winer & powerjoe for great advice. More questions: This is a 5.1 room in progress. As you can se you can slide .L & .R speakers in 30 degrees axe so it’s possible to get perfect triangle with listening position. 38%. Is it from the window or surface of the speakers? PS. My new beautiful Portico 512 now occupies the empty space in the 19” rack. http://gearslutz.com/board/attachmen...1&d=1141683886
__________________ http://www.mmvstudios.com |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 233
| Cheers Kurt! We love our new Porticos Too! Amazing! The distance percentage is from the front wall. Not the speakers. So, your head is 38% from the drywall (etc) on your front wall. Alrighty! |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Sep 2004 Location: Sweden
Posts: 295
| Thanx. ![]()
__________________ http://www.mmvstudios.com |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |