![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | preamp noise floor specs question.
Helllo, i have a question regarding noise specs on preamps. the chandler TG2 has a noise floor of -85dbu, while the Great River mp2nv has a noise floor of -126. just wondering what these numbers mean and if they would make a difference? also, i noticed that both these preamps have a lot of gain +70 db. does this make the great river much quieter than the chandler at +70 db or am i missing something here? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Motown legend Joined: Jun 2002 Location: Songwriter Gulch, Nashville TN
Posts: 10,876
|
I've never found a whole lot of correlation between a mike pre-amp's noise spec and its subjective noise level. The most important spec in my experience has been overall dynamic range which naturally is rarely advertised. Part of the story is how the pre-amp loads a particular mike. Transformers also can make a preamp that measures worse sound quieter because of where the noise spectrum lies. I wish it were easy, you really need to listen and compare using the mikes and signal path you intend to use.
__________________ Bob's room 615 562-4346 Georgetown Masters 615 254-3233 Music Industry 2.0 Interview |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear |
Thanks Bob. that's pretty much what i thought. gotta use your ears. Heard the Chandler has an amazing dynamic range. |
| | |
| | #4 | |
| Voiding warranties Joined: Feb 2004 Location: beautiful Carlsbad, CA
Posts: 10,067
| Re: preamp noise floor specs question. Quote:
Most well designed transformer input mic pre's get an ein of about -127 db. Non-transformer pre's can best that typically getting to -129 with a 150 ohm source. Really well designed pre's are even quieter than that as long as the source impedance is lower. Theoretical limits or self noise of a 150 ohm resistor is about -130 db. Some pre's measure -132 at 50 ohms impedance. What's missing from the ein spec is real world noise at lower gains, some pre's are lower in noise at lower gains, getting equal in noise only at full tilt. Jim Williams Audio Upgrades
__________________ Jim Williams Audio Upgrades | |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear |
thanks jim
|
| | |
| | #6 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2003 Location: Tujunga
Posts: 3,721
| Re: preamp noise floor specs question. Quote:
Unfortunately, IMHO, I don't think that some of the Neve cloners got around to swotting up on how Neve actually tested their units and measured noise. For a start, a dB value for noise is pretty useless unless you reveal all the other aspects of the measurement. Like, what does -85dBu mean? Is this the noise when the unit is at 0dB gain or 70dB gain? What filters were used? What termination was used on the input? Neve measured noise by terminating the input with a 200 ohm resistor. The absolute electrons wobbling down a piece of wire type noise floor of a 200 ohm source at 20 degrees is -129dBu so this is minimum noise you could ever achieve. They set the module to 80dB gain and measure the noise on the output with a 20Hz to 20KHz filter. It was generally better than -45dBu. You add the measured noise to the gain of the amplifier and get a figure of -125dB and this is the EIN (Estimated Input Noise) which should strive to get near to the 129 figure. In reality, the Neve modules were quieter than -45dB so it would appear that Dan (who obviously knows how to measure noise) makes modules that match (new) original Neve modules for quietness. If the amplifier could only make 70dB gain, the noise would be around 10dB better (say -55dB) so adding this to the 70dB gain still gets us the -125dB EIN figure. Until all mic pre manufacturers apply the same kind of measuring techniques there's little to be learned from the numbers. What you need look out for are the termination value, module gain, and filter slopes and then you can work out the EIN for yourself.
__________________ Geoff Tanner Aurora Audio International See us on Facebook ![]() http://www.facebook.com/auroraaudio http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may1...off-tanner.htm http://www.auroraaudio.net/ http://www.amazon.com/Window-Past-Ge...8737082&sr=1-9 http://www.grandmasterrecorders.com For quicker responses, please use my email (Geoff at auroraaudio.net) in preference to pm's on these forums. | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear |
thanks, Geoff! yep that pretty much sets it straight. numbers are useless to me |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Moderator Joined: Jun 2002 Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,410
|
Geoff, slight error there, EIN = Equivalent Input Noise Tim. |
| | |
| | #9 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2003 Location: Tujunga
Posts: 3,721
| Quote:
Gosh... did I really write "Estimated"? Oh my gosh... senility is creeping up on me What was my name again? | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| noise floor question | Westmalle | Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording | 10 | 14th April 2008 02:08 AM |
| noise floor when mixing analogue | lowswing | High end | 4 | 29th July 2005 07:47 AM |
| Expected noise floors. | Lee Tyler | Low End Theory | 3 | 30th December 2004 05:22 AM |
| What's the noise floor in your DAW? | faeflora | High end | 8 | 28th August 2004 03:44 AM |
| Slam users what´s your noise floor experience with the Slam? | Ruphus | High end | 19 | 24th February 2004 09:31 PM |
| |