ART Pro MPA II vs API 3124+...can you tell the difference? - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Gear Shootouts / Audio file uploads / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests

ART Pro MPA II vs API 3124+...can you tell the difference?
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th March 2013   #1
Gear nut
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Englewood, CO

Thread Starter
ART Pro MPA II vs API 3124+...can you tell the difference?

ART Pro MPA II VS API 3124+ by AnnihilationRecordings on SoundCloud - Hear the world’s sounds

For this test i did not test the mic inputs or push either preamp into distortion. All this fairly tests is how clean each instrument input is, but I thought it would still be fun to share.

For this experiment, I programmed the drums, and recorded dry guitar and bass tracks through a radial j48 direct box into an apogee rosetta 800.

I got my tones using amp and cab sims. I then recorded vocals using the api 3124+ into the rosetta.

Next, I rendered my guitar tones and drums in my daw, and sent the individual tracks with no eq, compression, or mixing of any kind out my radial x-amp one at a time and recorded each twice, once through the instrument input of the ART, and once through the instrument input of the API. I did this with the vocals too, so they went through the API twice for the "api mix".

Then I mixed it, applying EXACTLY the same mix to each set of files. I bounced my mixes, then cut them up and wove them together so I could hear the song constantly switching from the API to ART tracks.

One of these preamps I labelled "Preamp 1" in the comments on this track and the other is "Preamp 2". Which is which?

Here's the wave file if you aren't liking the soundcloud compression.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/75652364/ART_VS_API.wav

Last edited by AnnihilationRob; 8th April 2013 at 10:42 PM.. Reason: Added link to wave file
AnnihilationRob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 19th March 2013   #2
Lives for gear
 
DR Music's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Chicago Subs, IL
Posts: 2,338

I like 2 a little better..
DR Music is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 20th March 2013   #3
Lives for gear
 
isawsasquatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Bluff Creek
Posts: 1,092

Preamp 1 has a nice midrange and transient response. Preamp 2 has a wider low end (which may or may not be "better").

The top end is difficult to judge because you've either uploaded a poorly-encoded mp3, or the soundcloud streaming using some kind of lossy codec. Either way, it sounds terrible.

Nice drum programming, by the way.
isawsasquatch is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 21st March 2013   #4
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 873

Quote:
Originally Posted by isawsasquatch View Post
Preamp 1 has a nice midrange and transient response. Preamp 2 has a wider low end (which may or may not be "better").
This is what I heard too. Very subtle, but it's there. I'm guessing the ART is preamp 2, since it's a little "flabby" on the bottom. Big sounding, but not tight.

Never owned a 3124 but I'm guessing it's the more focused pre.

Even so, I think the example shows that a "budget" pre is not going to make or break your recording. (Remember the ART vs GR thread?)
Yummerz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2013   #5
Lives for gear
 
isawsasquatch's Avatar
 
Joined: Apr 2009
Location: Bluff Creek
Posts: 1,092

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yummerz View Post
I'm guessing the ART is preamp 2, since it's a little "flabby" on the bottom. Big sounding, but not tight.
Agreed. But given the poor quality of encoding, I'm not totally confident.

Quote:
Even so, I think the example shows that a "budget" pre is not going to make or break your recording. (Remember the ART vs GR thread?)
I thought the ART vs GR thread was rather obvious, in that the GR sounded much, much better. This test strikes me as a bit less scientific, and a bit less revealing, considering the approach the OP took to do the test.
isawsasquatch is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2013   #6
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 873

Quote:
Originally Posted by isawsasquatch View Post
I thought the ART vs GR thread was rather obvious, in that the GR sounded much, much better.
On second listen, in a good monitoring environment--definitely.
Yummerz is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2013   #7
Lives for gear
 
jinksdingo's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Location: Sydney
Posts: 762

Pre amp 1 sounded better to me on my 4" Edirols.
Preamp 2 sounded compressed, all segments very hard to differentiate and I thought it was a trick to get the track listened to, with some compression applied to pre 2.
But as I said my PC monitors are only 4" Edirols.
__________________
------------------------------------------------------
A great mix is created at the source
A compressor is a "voltage turn it downer".
You can determine when it begins to turn it down and when it resumes from turning it down, even how quickly it does it's "turn it down" and by how much it turns it down so you can push more voltage into it to be turned down and then make up for gain lossed from turning it down.Bart Nettle
jinksdingo is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2013   #8
Gear nut
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Englewood, CO

Thread Starter
Haha, no tricks here. Here's the wave file if you aren't liking the soundcloud compression.

https://dl.dropbox.com/u/75652364/ART_VS_API.wav

Obviously, it won't be labelled but you can probably figure out which measures are which by checking the soundcloud labels.
AnnihilationRob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2013   #9
Gear Head
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 30

Could you PM the answer?
disconinja is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th April 2013   #10
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,855

I prefer 1 for this style of music, which is what I do almost exclusively. PM the answer please?

Also, killer song/performance!
PoorGlory is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2013   #11
Gear nut
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Location: Englewood, CO

Thread Starter
Hey guys I'm not planning to post the answer here. Just PM me for it.

isawsasquatch, I think this is about as scientific as it gets. The ART vs GR thread is actually rather unscientific since it was two different performances. In this test the only variable that changed at all was the preamp. Everything else is utterly identical.
AnnihilationRob is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2013   #12
Gear nut
 
chazmar's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 134

I like 2 better. Nothing significant, but it seems a little snappier and a bit more expensive sounding.

This could be a very ironic outcome. :^)
chazmar is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th April 2013   #13
Lives for gear
 
DR Music's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2011
Location: Chicago Subs, IL
Posts: 2,338

Quote:
Originally Posted by chazmar View Post
I like 2 better. Nothing significant, but it seems a little snappier and a bit more expensive sounding.

This could be a very ironic outcome. :^)
Good ear!!
DR Music is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 16th April 2013   #14
Lives for gear
 
madehumble's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,393

Can I get the answer to the MPA VS API thread. Thanks.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I317 using Tapatalk
madehumble is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 24th April 2013   #15
Gear interested
 
Joined: May 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 16

Send a message via AIM to JonnyGinese Send a message via Skype™ to JonnyGinese
Using my AT - m50 headphones i couldn't really hear any difference.. Maybe one of them had slightly more "punch" but nothing that couldn't have been made up for with a slightly different Compression setting.

Listening to the WAV file I cant tell when anything changes.. Do you have the same Tubes that come stock in the ART MPA ii?

I Facebook messaged you, reply answer in there please
__________________
| Tutorials For Reaper | Real World Recording w/Reaper | Producing MIDI in Reaper |
AIM:RSRecordings | Skype:RSRecords | Email: Jon.Ginese(at)Gmail(dot)com | Chattanooga, TN
JonnyGinese is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2013   #16
Lives for gear
 
guitarboy94's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,227

The differences are extremely subtle. Almost to the point where just a splash of additive or subtractive EQ could make the tracks sound identical. I'll be keeping my Art MPA and spending my cash on ANYTHING other than high end preamps. Thanks for posting! I'm also not hearing that "mud" buildup from stacked tracks that's often touted as the reasoning for investing in expensive preamps. What a load of crock..
__________________
Download my entire album for FREE via Noisetrade.com!
http://www.noisetrade.com/patrickskelton

visit my website:
www.patrickskelton.com
guitarboy94 is offline  
1
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
DPA-4060 vs DPA-4006 The Battle, recording made by Onno and Gaston Gaston69 Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 114 30th March 2013 05:01 PM
The Show & Tell Thread for the Remotester in us all... Remoteness Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 250 1st February 2013 05:00 AM
POLL: CAN YOU TELL?? DID I USE SOFTWARE OR HARDWARE SAMPLES CareerTech1 So much gear, so little time! 15 27th November 2006 11:52 AM
The Big Shoot Out at the Audio Chorale Jay Kahrs Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 72 27th December 2004 01:20 PM
Show & Tell of the Stroking kind... Remoteness Remote Possibilities in Acoustic Music & Location Recording 19 22nd October 2003 04:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:12 AM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.