ITB 'Vintage' Compressors - Blind Test! - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Gear Shootouts / Audio file uploads / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests

ITB 'Vintage' Compressors - Blind Test!
View Poll Results: Which Vintage Compressor did it for you?
Compressor 1 4 14.81%
Compressor 2 1 3.70%
Compressor 3 13 48.15%
Compressor 4 1 3.70%
Compressor 5 8 29.63%
Voters: 27. You may not vote on this poll

Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th December 2012   #1
Gear interested
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
ITB 'Vintage' Compressors - Blind Test!

Dear 'Slutz,

I'm new here, so be easy on me.

I figured you can never have too many audio examples, and I've been reading a lot on Gearslutz recently about ITB mixing, and how to get 'that' vintage sound.

So here's a blind test for you all.

I have a two bar drum loop, and I've processed it through five different compressors, each of which offers an 'analog' style sound. Where some compressors are more versatile, I've used them in their analog modes.

I used:

Waves API 2500 (with 'analog' mode on)
Waves SSL GChannel
iZotope Alloy 2 (with 'vintage' mode on)
iZotope Trash 2
Logic Compressor


They all have the exact same Attack, Release, Threshold, Ratio, Knee and Makeup Gain settings. The settings are a medium squash, designed to start introducing some 'glue' or saturation into the mix.

Let me know which one you think is which, and more importantly which one you prefer the sound of, and I'll let you all know the answers!

Shoot away!
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Drum Bus - Original.mp3 (424.8 KB, 457 views)
File Type: mp3 Compressor 1.mp3 (424.8 KB, 462 views)
File Type: mp3 Compressor 2.mp3 (424.8 KB, 435 views)
File Type: mp3 Compressor 3.mp3 (424.8 KB, 476 views)
File Type: mp3 Compressor 4.mp3 (424.8 KB, 418 views)
File Type: mp3 Compressor 5.mp3 (424.8 KB, 381 views)
MonikerMatt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2012   #2
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 1,232

I like 3 best, 4 sounds by far the worst, the kick is destroyed.

As too which is which, i dont know, 2,3 and 5 all sound fairly similar so 4 is the odd one out but I'm guessing thats due to matching settings rather than by ear 4 is squashing way more than the other 3.

Hoping 3 is Alloy but i reckon its the API

Ben
digital 1010 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2012   #3
Lives for gear
 
FossilTooth's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 923

I agree that #4 is the only one that sounded downright lousy and artificial on this particular loop. Maybe it would work on other things or with other settings, but not as it is on this clip -- it just sounded amateur to my ear at these settings.

Honestly, they're all fine in this context, #4 aside. I'd be pretty happy with 1, 3 or 5.

#1 is perhaps the most subtle, except on that initial kick hit. That's where you really here the differences on these compressor examples: attack and release times and slopes.

If you want "that vintage sound" start listening to a lot of vintage records and compressing and recording and EQing with vintage tastes in mind. The secret to making things sound like they're of another era isn't in the gear quite as much as it's in the choices.

There are a lot of records made on vintage gear that sound very "modern." The opposite can be achieved as well. This game is all about taste, not toys.
FossilTooth is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2012   #4
Gear interested
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by FossilTooth View Post
The secret to making things sound like they're of another era isn't in the gear quite as much as it's in the choices.
For sure, you are absolutely right, but not forgetting that the way a lot of vintage gear was designed does still come in to play sonically.

That's sort of why I wanted to do this test, to see how the coloration of these plugs would stand up, though it's definitely NOT a case of suddenly sounding awesomely vintage just by buying them! With you on that!

I won't reveal the results yet, let's keep guessing away. And yes, I definitely matched them exactly by settings, but I was surprised that #4 was so different.
MonikerMatt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2012   #5
Lives for gear
 
euphoria89's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 1,125

2 and 4 sound like the SSL and API modules. I think 2 is the SSL, and 4 the API, but to me they sound a little like i remember them.
euphoria89 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2012   #6
Lives for gear
 
lobsterinn's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Location: Portland, Ore.
Posts: 1,005
My Recordings/Credits

Did you use any of the filter or distortion modeling on the Trash 2 example? If you really want to use it to mimic vintage analog gear, some judicious use of those processes would help nudge it in that direction. It is so versatile, I imagine you could get pretty close to anything if you spent enough time tweaking.

As far as the samples, they all sound useable in the right context. I'm sure with the rest of the music un-muted I would have an opinion which was best.
lobsterinn is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2012   #7
Gear interested
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by lobsterinn View Post
Did you use any of the filter or distortion modeling on the Trash 2 example? If you really want to use it to mimic vintage analog gear, some judicious use of those processes would help nudge it in that direction. It is so versatile, I imagine you could get pretty close to anything if you spent enough time tweaking.

As far as the samples, they all sound useable in the right context. I'm sure with the rest of the music un-muted I would have an opinion which was best.
I didn't use anything except the compressor for the Trash 2 example. You are right, there are some more features there, just as there are in Alloy 2 and the GChannel that I could use to make it sound even better, but this was just focussing on the comps. And the Trash 2 comp does impart some nice glue anyway, as do the others.

Also - I agree. I own all of these plugs and they are all usable, so the final reveal isn't intended to say 'this plug good' and 'this plug bad', but rather to let people decide for themselves which one they generally prefer the sound of in this context. No matter what wins and what loses here, each of these plugins has people who swear by them. It's all good :-)

I've already done the double blind test with these files myself. Be interesting to compare at the end.
MonikerMatt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2012   #8
Lives for gear
 
kraku's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,665
My Recordings/Credits

You should RMS match those clips. They get slightly louder towards the end (except the clip number 4). Human brain deciphers louder = better which will definitely skew the results.

On first listening through the clips sounded different to me. On a second listening through when taking into consideration the unequal volume levels, they sounded really close to each other, no big differences there, except the clip number 4.

Could you post RMS matched clips?
__________________
WTB: Roland MC-80, Roland S-760, Akai Z8, Ensoniq DP/4+
---
http://www.youtube.com/aflecht
http://www.youtube.com/krakulandia
kraku is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2012   #9
Gear interested
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
i can post them up this weekend for sure.

but just to be clear, i wanted this test to be about how each compressor works with exactly the same settings.

so if one compressor comes in slightly quieter with the same settings as another, that's something that i think we should be aware of and why, rather than me posting clips of compressors with different settings to account for RMS matching.

in my humble opinion, though, i do know what you mean.
MonikerMatt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2012   #10
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 33

4 really sounds like the Waves API to me. I'm thinking the Waves SSL is either 2 or 3. I haven't used any of the other 3, so I have no idea how they sound. I prefer 3 and 5 in this test.
Whistlin' Pete is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 10th December 2012   #11
Gear nut
 
20100db's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Kain, Tournai
Posts: 102

Send a message via MSN to 20100db Send a message via Skype™ to 20100db
And...
what's the verdict?
;-)
20100db is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012   #12
Lives for gear
 
kraku's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 1,665
My Recordings/Credits

Quote:
Originally Posted by 20100db View Post
And...
what's the verdict?
;-)
The verdict is that louder sounds better.
kraku is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012   #13
Gear nut
 
20100db's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Kain, Tournai
Posts: 102

Send a message via MSN to 20100db Send a message via Skype™ to 20100db
if you put the same rms, the louder sounds less good !
20100db is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2012   #14
Gear nut
 
20100db's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Location: Kain, Tournai
Posts: 102

Send a message via MSN to 20100db Send a message via Skype™ to 20100db
???
;-)
20100db is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th December 2012   #15
Gear maniac
 
jcoutu1's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Uxbridge, MA
Posts: 207

Send a message via AIM to jcoutu1
Any results yet?

4 Sounds weak. I haven't used all of the comps listed here, so I can pick which is which.
jcoutu1 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2012   #16
Gear nut
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 86

So.... any update?
theturtlemafia is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th January 2013   #17
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 9

Liked the third most, fourth least. No idea which is which.

So, OP, let's hear it?
Tjad is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2013   #18
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 65

Hmm Im going for 5.
Alcje is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2013   #19
Lives for gear
 
henge's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Bowmanville,Ontario
Posts: 2,430

I like 5 the best. Never having worked with these comps I can't say which is which.
__________________
Henge
Website http://www.villageworkscanada.com
henge is online now  
1
Reply With Quote
Old 7th February 2013   #20
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Location: Clermont Ferrand FR
Posts: 24

Result please?
djayart is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2013   #21
Gear addict
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 348

doogie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2013   #22
Gear addict
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 348

where's the result for this?
doogie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2013   #23
Gear addict
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 348

seriously did one of the company's get to you and buy you off?
doogie is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 2nd April 2013   #24
Gear maniac
 
jcoutu1's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Uxbridge, MA
Posts: 207

Send a message via AIM to jcoutu1
We're not getting the results to this. He joined GS then 2 days later was his activity.


MonikerMatt MonikerMatt is offline
Gear interested

Send Message
User Lists

Last Activity: 6th December 2012
jcoutu1 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #25
Gear interested
 
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 11

Thread Starter
Hey now.. I took my time OKAY? :-)

1) Logic Compressor

2) Waves API 2500

3) iZotope Alloy 2

4) SSL GCHannel

5) iZotope Trash 2

what does everyone think now? i was actually surprised by how much i loved the sound of the logic compressor compared to the waves stuff, and also i did like alloy 2 a lot as well
MonikerMatt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4 Days Ago   #26
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 68

#4 sounded horrid (I closed it within seconds )
Dude111 is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
what was mixed ITB? kokaby So much gear, so little time! 139 13th November 2012 12:42 PM
Third Eye Blind 1st album gtr tones? Blast9 Q & A with Eric Valentine 31 17th March 2011 11:03 AM
DAC blind comparison project advice? TimbaBeat So much gear, so little time! 9 1st August 2007 11:36 AM
Finding or making resources for auditioning plug-ins and outboard compressors/EQs nathanhall So much gear, so little time! 8 12th April 2007 06:41 PM
Printing Tracks when Mixing ITB JohnnyTooLoud So much gear, so little time! 5 26th December 2006 03:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.