SSL-4072 G+ Series VS. VCC, NLS and Buss Compressors! - Page 3 - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Gear Shootouts / Audio file uploads / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests

SSL-4072 G+ Series VS. VCC, NLS and Buss Compressors!
Topic: New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 4th December 2012   #61
Gear maniac
 
Xavier L's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: St Pierre and Miquelon
Posts: 166

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Rash View Post
Because once you start actually mixing, using it's EQ's and Compressors, Inserting outboard inserts on channels it becomes a whole other world of amazingness that I can't get out of a computer.
I know what you mean, I own a console and mix on it, but regarding the sound I can't help thinking there's a waste of money somewhere.
Just speaking of your test, 2 people out of 4 prefered the plug in mix, 1 out of 4 prefered the ITB mix... I spoted the C but they were all so similar I had to have 6 or 7 listening and I wasn't 100% of my choice.
That said I'll never be back mixing in the box again.
Best.
__________________
Studio Sesame

http://www.orange-mm.com
Xavier L is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2012   #62
Gear maniac
 
Aaron Rash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 231

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xavier L View Post
I know what you mean, I own a console and mix on it, but regarding the sound I can't help thinking there's a waste of money somewhere.
Just speaking of your test, 2 people out of 4 prefered the plug in mix, 1 out of 4 prefered the ITB mix... I spoted the C but they were all so similar I had to have 6 or 7 listening and I wasn't 100% of my choice.
That said I'll never be back mixing in the box again.
Best.
That is what I realized most people picked the Waves mix. I think allot of it has to do with whats current. Most songs out now are all mixed in the box with plugins. So when people hear the console that doesn't sound like a plug-in it doesn't sound "pro" or "hot" anymore. Consoles will only be for the people that can maintain them and afford their ridiculous monthly power bill. The rewards (for me) are so worth it though. I'm interested in trying AlexB's CLC with the EQ's and comps to see how it compares.
Aaron Rash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 4th December 2012   #63
Geariophile
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 9,629

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Rash View Post
I think allot of it has to do with whats current. Most songs out now are all mixed in the box with plugins. So when people hear the console that doesn't sound like a plug-in it doesn't sound "pro" or "hot" anymore.
Spot on me thinks. Sadly. Plastic is the new black.
Karloff70 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2012   #64
Gear addict
 
Sir Chris's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Miami, FL.
Posts: 397

Aaron if its not too much to ask I would LOVE it if you could conduct this same test only with acoustic instruments (drums, grts, bass, vox, etc). Nothing against computer generated sounds but I think we would hear a more dramatic difference between the 4 with acoustic instruments.

Thanks for the test. It was fun and educational. I'm saving the files in my comp to always have around for reference and to show people when they're over my place lol.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Sir Chris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 5th December 2012   #65
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Location: OSNY, Val d'Oise (95), France
Posts: 1,383

Well, even knowing the answers, I prefer A all the time.

Maybe it's because I can clearly hear it saturate in a way that I like.

But as I never have mixed on a real board, I had no idea what to look for while listening.
K-Slash is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 6th December 2012   #66
Gear maniac
 
Aaron Rash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 231

Thread Starter
Thanks everyone for the input. I'll do that next time I'm running a acoustic session. I might even jump on the C7 in the tracking room later on tonight. I'm mixing another record for my solo stuff so I'll be doing more summing shootouts soon!

Aaron
Aaron Rash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2012   #67
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,456

Thanks for taking the time Aaron, nice test!
It's funny because there's a nice tone to the chorus vocals at 0:50 that both NLS and VCC lack of. I suspect the compressors are part of what makes that differences, I like the ITB version the best after the SSL, good for my budget!
A.
Andy_bt is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 7th December 2012   #68
Gear Head
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 36

Hi Aaron,
thanks for doing this test and for posting the results!
Seems I was quite right for a change (I usually fail at these).
Nice sound from the console!

Just wondering, what oversampling settings did you use on the VCC?
In my experience, using 8xOS does make quite a difference in tightness.
I´ve read this tip in a post here somewhere to load up a bass drum sample, put the VCC API on top and go through the OS settings and it does have a nice effect on higher settings in my experience.

Cheers,
Christian
Gertius is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 8th December 2012   #69
Gear maniac
 
Aaron Rash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 231

Thread Starter
Hey Christian,

The problem is... Nothing I do is able to match the low end of the console. People say that SSL's are pretty flat but it's not true. There's so much it's doing to the sound. Even when I used VCC and VTM no matter what I did, I couldn't get it to sound as thick and heavy as the console. I'll give AlexB consoles a shot!
Aaron Rash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 9th December 2012   #70
Gear addict
 
RaySoul's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 488

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Rash View Post
That is what I realized most people picked the Waves mix.
Interesting test. I think the reason most people(myself included) preferred the Waves mix is because, when listening through speakers(I'm listening through a small pair of JBL Duets), it has more punch. When I listen through headphones(Sony MDR7506), C has a richness that A doesn't have that sounds great, but there's an amount of saturation that is swallowing the snare transients. The SSL setting on VCC(which I have and like) is NOT my favorite...

I spent many years mixing on SSL consoles. Love the sound of them, but I'm finding that really talented mixers are getting serious quality ITB. Excellent example of the potential of NLS. I'm really digging that plug. Especially the Mike(EMI) console...
__________________
I'm not really RaySoul, but I play him at Gearslutz...

Mac Pro Quad (4.1) | 12G Ram OSX 10.6.8 | PT10-11 | CPTK2
RaySoul is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012   #71
Gear addict
 
Sir Chris's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Miami, FL.
Posts: 397

I went back to listen to the mixes again on my HS10's and still can't put my finger on C. Waves mix sounds punchier/more powerful. But even when I focus in on the highs and low end. I really don't hear what is it about the SSL mix that stands out or makes it obvious that its the real thing. Next round I'm gonna bring out ear buds and portable speakers and see if anything is more apparent.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Sir Chris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012   #72
Gear maniac
 
Aaron Rash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 231

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sir Chris View Post
I went back to listen to the mixes again on my HS10's and still can't put my finger on C. Waves mix sounds punchier/more powerful. But even when I focus in on the highs and low end. I really don't hear what is it about the SSL mix that stands out or makes it obvious that its the real thing. Next round I'm gonna bring out ear buds and portable speakers and see if anything is more apparent.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
C has a fullness factor going on. Only word I can use to describe is "syrup" It sounds like it has more weight. Think of sidebands on analog tape. Allot like that, everything else sounds hollow in comparison
Aaron Rash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012   #73
Gear maniac
 
Aaron Rash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 231

Thread Starter
Alright! I hope everyone is ready for round 2... This time I got a bit more extreme with this shootout. Not only is there summing going on but now I've used the EQ's and compressors on the board. Up to this point nothing I've done with any plugin can match the low end of the console. So this is a 4072 G+ series against Slate's VCC WITH VTM added to try to get the low end bigger. I also used Waves SSL Channel strips for the compression and EQ to match the board. Alight so witch one is the console slutz?
Attached Thumbnails
SSL-4072 G+ Series VS. VCC, NLS and Buss Compressors!-photo.jpg  
Attached Files
File Type: wav Mix A.wav (4.40 MB, 197 views)
File Type: wav Mix B.wav (4.40 MB, 201 views)
Aaron Rash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 11th December 2012   #74
Gear maniac
 
Xavier L's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Location: St Pierre and Miquelon
Posts: 166

The low end has more definition in the B mix.
The high mids and highs have more "air" in the A mix.
Well you've lost me there... they sure sound different but I can't say one is really better than the other. The compressor seems to behave very differently on those 2 samples.

Ok B is the console...
Xavier L is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012   #75
Frequency Wrangler
 
CaptainHook's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 520

The mixes sound VERY different. Are you saying you couldn't get them to match any closer, or that you just 'matched settings'?

I like 'A' more for what it's worth.

If 'B' is ITB, would you be up for posting the tracks so i could try match it to 'A' using VCC/VTM/etc myself?
If 'A' is ITB, don't worry about it.
__________________
=> York Street Recording Studios <=

"Art is the expression of imagination, not the reproduction of reality." - Henry Moore
CaptainHook is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012   #76
Gear interested
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Location: Buenos Aires, Argentina
Posts: 6

Alo Slutz!!

I prefer "A"

Cheers from Argentina!!
Agustin Mongelli is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012   #77
Gear maniac
 
Aaron Rash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 231

Thread Starter
Sure... PM me your email if you would like to try.

That's just the thing though. Even with VCC and VTM I can't get the ITB to match up with how colossal the board sounds. The way it's advertised is like I'll never need a console again and I can throw the tape deck out. I don't know, I think next it's time to fire up the A800 and do a shootout with it. If anyone has Nebula CLC I would like to try it out!
Aaron Rash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012   #78
Gear maniac
 
Aaron Rash's Avatar
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Location: Houston
Posts: 231

Thread Starter
UPDATE

Alright everyone I have an update. I've stumbled upon a magic formula witch seems to duplicate the sound of the console pretty well, it requires allot of plugins though.

Okay so first insert the Waves NLS SSL (Spike) on every single channel of the mix. Leave the drive at 0
Next add the NLS Nevo Buss on the master fader set the drive to 6
Now we add VCC Neve on every single channel with drive set to 6
Then we have to put a VCC Bus on the master set it to Trident
It's time for SSL Channel strips for the EQ and comp pop it on every channel EQ and compress as needed
Next go to the master buss and insert the Vertigo by brainworx I found it sounds most like a real compressor
Next add the Slate VTM set to the mastering deck GP9 30ips but dont drive it too hard
Finally, the stereo image on the console is different so to compensate for this I added the Waves S1 stereo imager and just opened it up a bit.

And there you have it a real SSL in the box. Of course they sound different but they both sound really really good. I did it all at 96K I cant speak for lower samplerates. Give it a try, you'll be glad you did. I wil post files soon.

Aaron
Aaron Rash is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012   #79
Gear nut
 
FakeOnMercy's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 102

the mixes sound different

A> has to much low, sounds a bit muddy, highs sound artificial
B> punchier, tracks more energy, tight, nice glue... sounds like a record

so probably B is the console
FakeOnMercy is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012   #80
Gear addict
 
Sir Chris's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Miami, FL.
Posts: 397

Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Rash View Post
C has a fullness factor going on. Only word I can use to describe is "syrup" It sounds like it has more weight. Think of sidebands on analog tape. Allot like that, everything else sounds hollow in comparison
Thanks so much for the description. I can definitely hear it now.

As far as the new mix. I hope I'm right on this one but I think its obvious A is the board and B is plugs.

A has that weight you describe and B sounds kinda hollow.

Sent from my Nexus S 4G using Tapatalk
Sir Chris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012   #81
Gear addict
 
Sir Chris's Avatar
 
Joined: Aug 2012
Location: Miami, FL.
Posts: 397

Sir Chris is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 12th December 2012   #82
Toronto Maple Leafs fan
 
jordanvoth's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Winnipeg MB
Posts: 2,052

Send a message via MSN to jordanvoth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aaron Rash View Post
Alright everyone, it's time for the results!

If you guessed C then you were right! C is the real SSL with the center buss compressor.

A is Waves with the SSLComp Plugin
B is VCC with the Glue
C Real deal
D is ITB

No matter what I did with Waves or VCC I couldn't get the low end to sound like the real console. The console, if I could describe it sounds like someone laced a rope through the music and then tightened the living hell out of it. There's also something going on in the high end that I can't describe. There is a sense of weight that the console has that I still feel is missing from the plugins. I also picked out the real console in the Slate shootout on here against the exact console they modeled. I guess I'm just 1 of the 10% that can still hear the difference. I also can't get vocals to sound close with the plugins. On the console they get this "thing" to them that just sounds... Like a classic record. For me I'll still be mixing on the real console.

Thanks everyone for participating!
Once is luck, twice is science. I could pick the ITB mix, B sounded in the most slightest of ways better than the others. I should check out the Glue. My bus comp and summing unit are up for sale. Got the Kemper profiling amp yesterday, and in a few weeks my amps will up too. When technology replaces hardware to my ears I sell it.
jordanvoth is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012   #83
Geariophile
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 9,629

Quote:
Originally Posted by jordanvoth View Post
Once is luck, twice is science. I could pick the ITB mix, B sounded in the most slightest of ways better than the others. I should check out the Glue. My bus comp and summing unit are up for sale. Got the Kemper profiling amp yesterday, and in a few weeks my amps will up too. When technology replaces hardware to my ears I sell it.
Thought I saw you had sold the RJR comp already....if not, please pm me, as I'd love to take it off your hands given it has the required features.....
__________________
have confidence in your ability to rise above the foam - crufty
Karloff70 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012   #84
Gear addict
 
Markus Stock's Avatar
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Location: Mellrichstadt/Germany
Posts: 387

Pretty sure in the latest test that B is the SSL and A is the Waves Plugins. B has a better presence and less scoop + the sort of focused but still round low end like an SSL. More glue too. I'd be suprised if it was vice versa.
__________________
Markus Stock
Engineer/Co-owner of:
www.studioe.de
Markus Stock is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012   #85
Toronto Maple Leafs fan
 
jordanvoth's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Winnipeg MB
Posts: 2,052

Send a message via MSN to jordanvoth
Quote:
Originally Posted by Karloff70 View Post
Thought I saw you had sold the RJR comp already....if not, please pm me, as I'd love to take it off your hands given it has the required features.....
Sorry Karloff70 I just sold it. Still got the Rascal Audio Tonebuss for sale if you're interested.
jordanvoth is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012   #86
rem
Gear interested
 
rem's Avatar
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 20

I find A more musical than B. It matches more the vibe of the song. That's what matter. I am gonna try your magic formula to imitate the console thx for the tips !
rem is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 13th December 2012   #87
Gear Head
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 36

I would guess that sample B is the console. Just feels more alive.

Thanks for this new sample! Very interesting!
Keep em coming, very interested in that "faux console"

Cheers,
Christian
Gertius is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 14th December 2012   #88
Geariophile
 
Karloff70's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Location: london
Posts: 9,629

Quote:
Originally Posted by jordanvoth View Post
Sorry Karloff70 I just sold it. Still got the Rascal Audio Tonebuss for sale if you're interested.
Thought so. Bugger. No need for the Tonebuss, thanks.
Karloff70 is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2012   #89
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 285

On sorta lame speakers (on vacation), A is sounding pretty scooped in comparison to B.
Drywsef is online now  
Reply With Quote
Old 22nd December 2012   #90
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Location: Paris
Posts: 1,456

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drywsef View Post
On sorta lame speakers (on vacation), A is sounding pretty scooped in comparison to B.
Agreed, very different mixes.
The compression on B reminds me of plugins...?
A.
Andy_bt is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
PSP MixSaturator on the Mix Buss Pronecobra Music Computers 10 8th February 2013 03:03 PM
Duende vs. Liquid Mix vs. Waves V Series + 4000 Collection tGauge So much gear, so little time! 25 1st April 2009 03:17 AM
which compressor to add to the CL1B and the 5043. Maybe 1176 / MC77 ? musicsound-2 High end 0 27th November 2007 11:51 AM
Attack Settings For The Main Mix Compressor FossilTooth So much gear, so little time! 25 10th April 2007 08:49 PM
T-Racks on Master Buss luctellier Music Computers 11 15th February 2007 09:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:46 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.