For the people wondering about simple wav test, here you go. The audio from the J60 was recorded at 44.1, the whole thing was then converted to mp3
The order is BOTH PLAYING THE SAME WAV, TAL PLAYING IT FIRST: TRI, SQU, PULSE, TRI SQU, TRI PULSE
My personal opinion is that the TAL is awesome, but it lacks the bite mine has, maybe it's just mine... There is this analog sizzle I hear when I hear mine that the U-No doesn't have. I still contemplated selling my Juno after I did this test though.
Alot of people could say, okay they modeled a different 60, but there is this high pitch nasal type of sound that i hear in almost ALL analog synths... the Tal has some of it, but not all of it. Hope this helps! The Tal's filter isn't nearly as good as the 60... Its different too, when you want to make the same sounds on a 60, well mine atleast. It's awesome that it has portamento, which they had glide, so I can play all the keys, instead of monophonic! it would make killer wurli-esque sound. Really don't know why they did it like that lol... actually the filter on the TAL sounds horrible. its not creamy at all. its ice cold
Tal U-no-XL vs Juno 60.mp3 Tal U-no-XL vs Juno 60.m4a Tal U-No-XL vs Juno 60 by KennaOkoye on SoundCloud - Create, record and share your sounds for free
Will say this, I'd pay 100 bucks for Prophet, Jupiter emulation from these guys any day
New Reply 
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
