AKG C214 vs. Line Audio CM3 (LDC vs. SDC) - Gearslutz.com Gearslutz.com
 


All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Gear Shootouts / Audio file uploads / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests

AKG C214 vs. Line Audio CM3 (LDC vs. SDC)
New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 17th October 2011   #1
Gear Head
 
Joekkel's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 60

Thread Starter
AKG C214 vs. Line Audio CM3 (LDC vs. SDC)

hi there,

here's a little shootout between the akg c214 and a line audio cm3. both mics have their foam windshield on, cause i had no popkiller around...

akg c214 ldc around 399$
line audio cm3 sdc around 150$ (swedish mic)

same distances to both capsules and same performance (moving back and forth to the mics). the mics were amplifyed through a line audio 2mp, 100hz lowcut in. the files are rms-levelmatched. wav's added.

http://soundcloud.com/jbudweiser/lineaudio-cm3-shootout-new

http://soundcloud.com/jbudweiser/akg-c214-shootout-new

i know, both aren't real vocal mics, but i was quite shocked about what i heard. preferring one of those mics by miles on voice (and everything else).

edit: the akg c214 first had the mic-lowcut in, which sounded horrible. new files uploaded, now it sounds better.
Attached Files
File Type: wav akg-c214_shootout-new.wav (1.58 MB, 248 views)
File Type: wav lineaudio-cm3_shootout-new.wav (1.58 MB, 246 views)
Joekkel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2011   #2
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,105

The CM3 sounds here much better and more narural to my ears. There is a resonance in the C214 sound.
didier.brest is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2011   #3
Gear Head
 
Joekkel's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 60

Thread Starter
not only more natural. it actually has low end
Joekkel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th October 2011   #4
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,105

I uploaded the files and listened to them in Wavelab. The AKG sounds better there than from Soundstrips and I did not find the difference between both mics as large like in my first listening. The difference between both mics is at least as much in the highs than in the lows as shown by the attached spectrum. It shows CM3 response being higher below 100 Hz, the discrepancy being equal to about 3 dB at 80 Hz while the C214 has a bump between 7 and 16 kHz culminating around 12 kHz (+ 7 dB), which is rather consistent with the frequency response provided by AKG.

CM3 has more noise below 70 Hz likely because its extended low end makes it sensitive to vibrations from the stand as mentioned here. The cut above 17 kHz results from mp3 compression.
Attached Thumbnails
AKG C214 vs. Line Audio CM3 (LDC vs. SDC)-capture-2.jpg  
didier.brest is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 18th October 2011   #5
Gear Head
 
Joekkel's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Bern, Switzerland
Posts: 60

Thread Starter
thanks didier,

yeah, without the highpass in on the c214, they sound closer. still preferring the line audio, better balanced sound.
Joekkel is offline  
Reply With Quote
Old 17th June 2012   #6
Gear Head
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 30

I prefer the AKG C 214..much smoother sounding regarding the top end. The line audio's top end sound somewhat more 'brittle' and / or peaky to my ears.
rol123 is offline  
Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:44 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use / Privacy Policy - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

By using this site, you agree to our use of cookies.

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.