![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2010 Location: Germany
Posts: 35
Thread Starter | Sony DRE-S777 vs. Yamaha SREV1 vs. Altiverb
Hardware convolution is not dead. It is underrated. There are only two available units, that exist: The Sony DRE-S777 and the Yamaha SREV1. For a short time, I have both units in my studio. Please listen to the examples I made for you. I have recorded the dry files and the reverb tails. Try your own mix, import both files and let me know, what you prefer. The voice was recorded with the following equipment: Brauner VMA Manley Slam => GML 2020 Motu HD192 Vovox cables |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear nut Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 124
|
I would say that the hardware wins, but not by a landslide.
|
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2010 Location: Germany
Posts: 35
Thread Starter |
Hardware is clearly better. The main advantage is, that Altiverb vanishes in the mix. In a dense mix you can still hear the hardware.
|
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear interested |
Thanks for this Star, the hardware is clearly better! I'll take a REV1 and a DRE-777 thanks...... |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2010 Location: Germany
Posts: 35
Thread Starter |
The DRE-S777 and the SREV1 have their own strength. The big halls of a DRE-S777 are unbeatable. I now have the complete 5 CD library. It is unbelievable!! But the small rooms of the SREV1 are deeper than those in the DRE-S777. It seems to me, that the SREV1 is a perfect choice for drums. I love the "Epicurus studio" in the SREV1, it adds an extra punch to the sound. |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear Head Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 42
|
The hardware machines seem to add a different "color" to the sound, while the software seems more neutral. But I wonder if this is a product of the impulses, the converters, or other EQ/Modulation/etc... settings specific to each box. Is it possible to use the *exact same impulse* on each device, and to more-or-less replicate the additional settings on each? (I'm not asking OP to go off and do that -- just if it's possible to do so.) rs |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear addict Joined: May 2010
Posts: 364
|
I'm really digging the Gold Plate setting in my TC.
|
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,500
|
Cool clips...now I want DRE-S777. |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 482
|
I'm confused, were the same impulses used?, I don't see why hardware would be better when it comes to convolution reverb... If it were a algorithm I can see it, and yeah the way they implement the impulse for sure, But load the 2 same impulses, personal I think this test might have been more about which impulses each liked better, I agree the impulse I liked best was the Hardware, in any case. My favorite software convo. is by far Spaces by East West, |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Head Joined: Mar 2010 Location: Germany
Posts: 35
Thread Starter |
East West Spaces is a nice plugin. But the impulse responses were recorded with a Sony DRE-S777. I already asked East West to sell the original files in DRE-S777 format, but they didn't want. I am sure, that the DRE-S777 files sound better than Spaces does. Spaces doesn't have the deepness of the DRE-S777 when it comes to mixing. By the way, I really love to combine the 480L with the Sony. The Lexicon has the wideness and that special sound we all love . The Sony adds more deepness to the sound. |
| | |
| | #11 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: May 2003 Location: Cambridge MA USA
Posts: 1,113
| Quote:
The Sony uses massive DSP power to calculate the result in the time domain. The software based convos first convert the audio into the frequency domain and then back again into the time domain in order to reduce the DSP requirements to make them practical to run on a Mac or PC. While in theory these two methods can be made equivalent, it is quite possible that they are not, due to differing implemenations. ![]() -Casey
__________________ cdowdell@bricasti.com www.bricasti.com My love shall hear the music of my hounds. - Shakespeare | |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
|
Your dry file is voice + organ. The wet files are voice alone. Can we get the dry voice alone so that we can compete with plugins other than altiverb ?
|
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2006 Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 502
|
I would like to know which converters were used with the Yamaha Srev-1 to make the samples. I have two of these units and I first tried the Yamaha converters, then the Apogee AP8AD & AP8DA cards and I ended up using a Lucid 8824 with much better results. The reverbs were wider, deeper and clearer. A difference of night and day.
__________________ Berry Goedemans The Sonic Playground.nl |
| | |
| | #14 | |
| Gear maniac Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 178
| Quote:
On the subject of convolution you have to check these out if you use impulses. Kineticsoundprism esoteric impulses and synth patches | |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need Advice on 8 Bus Analog Mixers (A&H GL2800 vs. Yamaha IM8 vs. Soundcraft GB8) | Synth80s | So much gear, so little time! | 7 | 28th March 2011 08:04 PM |
| Tascam VL-A4 vs Yamaha MSP3 vs HS50M ... | mikeshep | Low End Theory | 5 | 4th May 2009 06:01 AM |
| Yamaha o2r vs. Mackie D8b vs. Yamaha o1v96 vs. any other small format digital mixer | SoniqKwality | So much gear, so little time! | 10 | 24th April 2009 02:10 PM |
| edirol m16dx vs yamaha n12 vs mbox2 | Checkmate Muzik | Low End Theory | 9 | 22nd January 2009 05:04 AM |
| Tascam FW-1884 vs Yamaha 01X vs ? | Spintonik | So much gear, so little time! | 1 | 12th September 2005 03:54 AM |
| |