Sony DRE-S777 vs. Yamaha SREV1 vs. Altiverb - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Audio file upload / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests


Sony DRE-S777 vs. Yamaha SREV1 vs. Altiverb

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 10th May 2011   #1
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 35

Thread Starter
Sony DRE-S777 vs. Yamaha SREV1 vs. Altiverb

Hardware convolution is not dead. It is underrated. There are only two available units, that exist: The Sony DRE-S777 and the Yamaha SREV1. For a short time, I have both units in my studio. Please listen to the examples I made for you.

I have recorded the dry files and the reverb tails. Try your own mix, import both files and let me know, what you prefer.

The voice was recorded with the following equipment:

Brauner VMA
Manley Slam => GML 2020
Motu HD192
Vovox cables
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Voice+Playback Dry.mp3 (1.22 MB, 962 views)
File Type: mp3 SREV1 Warm Wooden Church 2.mp3 (1.22 MB, 938 views)
File Type: mp3 SREV1 Warm Wooden Church 1.mp3 (1.22 MB, 875 views)
File Type: mp3 SREV1 St. John The Divine 1.mp3 (1.22 MB, 857 views)
File Type: mp3 SREV1 Live Wooden Church.mp3 (1.22 MB, 830 views)
File Type: mp3 DRE-S777 Church B.mp3 (1.22 MB, 932 views)
File Type: mp3 DRE-S777 Church A 2.mp3 (1.22 MB, 898 views)
File Type: mp3 DRE-S777 Church A.mp3 (1.22 MB, 865 views)
File Type: mp3 Altiverb Margaretakyrkan stereo 13m10.mp3 (1.22 MB, 941 views)
File Type: mp3 Altiverb Jean Baptiste 14.5.mp3 (1.22 MB, 869 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, Dry.mp3 (375.9 KB, 856 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, SREV1 Epicurus Studio.mp3 (375.9 KB, 888 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, SREV1 Cello Studio 1.mp3 (375.9 KB, 878 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, SREV1 Avatar Studio A.mp3 (375.9 KB, 872 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, DRE-S777 Studio Room A3.mp3 (380.0 KB, 899 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, DRE-S777 Studio Room A2.mp3 (375.9 KB, 865 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, DRE-S777 Studio Room A1.mp3 (375.9 KB, 912 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, Altiverb Cello Live Room 5.05.mp3 (375.9 KB, 894 views)
File Type: mp3 Drums, Altiverb Allaire Neve Room stereo 5.mp3 (375.9 KB, 872 views)
Starstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2011   #2
Gear nut
 
jimthepisces's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 124

I would say that the hardware wins, but not by a landslide.
jimthepisces is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 13th May 2011   #3
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 35

Thread Starter
Hardware is clearly better. The main advantage is, that Altiverb vanishes in the mix. In a dense mix you can still hear the hardware.
Starstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2011   #4
Gear interested
 
Robin Ball's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Location: Co.Wicklow
Posts: 26

Send a message via Skype™ to Robin Ball
Thanks for this Star, the hardware is clearly better! I'll take a REV1 and a DRE-777 thanks......
Robin Ball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th May 2011   #5
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 35

Thread Starter
The DRE-S777 and the SREV1 have their own strength. The big halls of a DRE-S777 are unbeatable. I now have the complete 5 CD library. It is unbelievable!!

But the small rooms of the SREV1 are deeper than those in the DRE-S777. It seems to me, that the SREV1 is a perfect choice for drums. I love the "Epicurus studio" in the SREV1, it adds an extra punch to the sound.
Starstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd June 2011   #6
Gear Head
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 42

The hardware machines seem to add a different "color" to the sound, while the software seems more neutral. But I wonder if this is a product of the impulses, the converters, or other EQ/Modulation/etc... settings specific to each box.

Is it possible to use the *exact same impulse* on each device, and to more-or-less replicate the additional settings on each?

(I'm not asking OP to go off and do that -- just if it's possible to do so.)

rs
ryansupak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2011   #7
Gear addict
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 364

I'm really digging the Gold Plate setting in my TC.
Voyage.One is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th September 2011   #8
bee
Lives for gear
 
bee's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,500

Cool clips...now I want DRE-S777.
bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th February 2012   #9
Gear addict
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 482

I'm confused, were the same impulses used?, I don't see why hardware would be better when it comes to convolution reverb...

If it were a algorithm I can see it, and yeah the way they implement the impulse for sure,

But load the 2 same impulses, personal I think this test might have been more about which impulses each liked better,

I agree the impulse I liked best was the Hardware, in any case.

My favorite software convo. is by far Spaces by East West,
laddie.music2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10th February 2012   #10
Gear Head
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Location: Germany
Posts: 35

Thread Starter
East West Spaces is a nice plugin. But the impulse responses were recorded with a Sony DRE-S777. I already asked East West to sell the original files in DRE-S777 format, but they didn't want. I am sure, that the DRE-S777 files sound better than Spaces does. Spaces doesn't have the deepness of the DRE-S777 when it comes to mixing.
By the way, I really love to combine the 480L with the Sony. The Lexicon has the wideness and that special sound we all love . The Sony adds more deepness to the sound.


Quote:
Originally Posted by laddie.music2 View Post
My favorite software convo. is by far Spaces by East West,
Starstreet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11th February 2012   #11
Lives for gear
 
Casey's Avatar
 
Joined: May 2003
Location: Cambridge MA USA
Posts: 1,113

Quote:
Originally Posted by laddie.music2 View Post
I'm confused, were the same impulses used?, I don't see why hardware would be better when it comes to convolution reverb...
There is a very simple answer to this. The Sony 777 uses a different algorithm to calculate the convolution results.

The Sony uses massive DSP power to calculate the result in the time domain.

The software based convos first convert the audio into the frequency domain and then back again into the time domain in order to reduce the DSP requirements to make them practical to run on a Mac or PC.

While in theory these two methods can be made equivalent, it is quite possible that they are not, due to differing implemenations.



-Casey
__________________
cdowdell@bricasti.com

www.bricasti.com

My love shall hear the music of my hounds. - Shakespeare
Casey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th February 2012   #12
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791

Your dry file is voice + organ. The wet files are voice alone. Can we get the dry voice alone so that we can compete with plugins other than altiverb ?
didier.brest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2012   #13
Lives for gear
 
Bigbang's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 502

I would like to know which converters were used with the Yamaha Srev-1 to make the samples.

I have two of these units and I first tried the Yamaha converters, then the Apogee AP8AD & AP8DA cards and I ended up using a Lucid 8824 with much better results. The reverbs were wider, deeper and clearer. A difference of night and day.
__________________
Berry Goedemans The Sonic Playground.nl
Bigbang is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2012   #14
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 178

Quote:
Originally Posted by Starstreet View Post
Hardware is clearly better. The main advantage is, that Altiverb vanishes in the mix. In a dense mix you can still hear the hardware.
yeah thats spot on , i found cubase reverance better or s.i.r myself.This thread makes me want that sony machine .

On the subject of convolution you have to check these out if you use impulses.

Kineticsoundprism esoteric impulses and synth patches
leaf studios is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need Advice on 8 Bus Analog Mixers (A&H GL2800 vs. Yamaha IM8 vs. Soundcraft GB8) Synth80s So much gear, so little time! 7 28th March 2011 08:04 PM
Tascam VL-A4 vs Yamaha MSP3 vs HS50M ... mikeshep Low End Theory 5 4th May 2009 06:01 AM
Yamaha o2r vs. Mackie D8b vs. Yamaha o1v96 vs. any other small format digital mixer SoniqKwality So much gear, so little time! 10 24th April 2009 02:10 PM
edirol m16dx vs yamaha n12 vs mbox2 Checkmate Muzik Low End Theory 9 22nd January 2009 05:04 AM
Tascam FW-1884 vs Yamaha 01X vs ? Spintonik So much gear, so little time! 1 12th September 2005 03:54 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:44 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.