![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear | JZ V47 vs real U47, also M49, Manley Gold, Horch, BH2 I just got the very new "vintage" V47 mic from JZ microphones ( JZ Microphones JZ - Main) , that according to the description brings the "legendary U47 sound". ![]() So I thought it could be very interesting to bring it next to the real U47 and other mics as well to hear how it sounds. We put together quite an interesting setup of microphones and tried to sing something (Neumann U47, M49, Manley Gold, Horch RM2J vs JZ V47 and BH-2). Once in my friend's studio , using API 3124 preamp and Lavry Blue AD - song 1. And then in my studio, using Thermionic Earlybird 2.2 preamp and Forssell MADC-2 converter - song 2 Here are short blind samples. Now guess, which is which mic )Song 1: 1 2 3 4 5 Song 2: a b c And now you can guess which mic is which ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 5,852
| Won't guess too much, but I liked 3 and 5 of the first lot and a and c of the last. Seems likely 3 and 5 are the Neumann's, although 3 seems much further from the mic, so can't tell which is which. 1, 2 and 4 sound a bit shrill in the API to varying degrees. So 3 and 5 and a and c are nice, the others a bit toppy for me. ![]() What's up with the purple badge U87 in the pics....? And is that a 47 or a Horch then?? Sure looks like a 47.....
__________________ Compress everything so it's amplitude is basically smooth like a square. - Kupiti |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear | Thank you for interesting remarks ... Horch is not in the picture ... Yes, API gives a bit of shrill to the sound ... (I personally am not a fan of it). Neumann U47 is on the left on the last two photos. The vintage U87 was not used in the songs |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear | I can't say wich mic is wich so i will say i like b of the 2nd song on the first song provably it's the preamp but i don't like how they sound but provably the 4 was the best for me. Will be fun when we know all the mics |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 5,852
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 5,852
| |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 1,201
| Song 1: 1. This one seams the softest and most intimate 2. Maybe the best all around of the 5, well balanced, seated well 3. The most pleasingly present. Brings the vocal to the forefront in just the right way 4. The only one I hated...almost hurt my ears, too biting for me 5. The bassiest, almost to the point being too tubby. I actually liked the soft vibe of 1 for this type of song, but might choose 3 if I could only choose one as it popped well. I could also live with 2. 4 & 5...nope. Song 2: I liked A followed by C with B sounding too harsh. I think A was the most balanced overall. XJ
__________________ "...learning it is far different from getting a good sound out of it" Mike Caffrey "The gear doesn't really care what kind of music you pump through it, be it rap or classical " thethrillfactor "Maybe it doesn't sound much like the original, but given that only 0.00000000000000137% of the population would know and only 0.00000041% of those would care, I'm not too worried about it." Dean Roddey |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 5,852
| |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Dream Catcher | Hey this looks like mine! ![]() I can't wait to hear the shootout, I think it'll be a make or break decision for the BH-2 whereas I want to keep it or not. |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Czech republic
Posts: 1,035
| Quote:
and must tell you you have very good ear![]()
__________________ www.soundevice-studio.cz | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2005 Location: Racine, WI
Posts: 1,201
| Can't wait to hear which was which. XJ |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Dream Catcher | I honestly don't know which one is my BH-2 in all of these ![]() All I know is that I don't like the API pre. |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Czech republic
Posts: 1,035
| Me neither ![]() |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 5,852
| Indeed the Earlybird is much more forgiving, however mic 3 and 5 'survive' the API sounding sweet........ ![]() |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Dream Catcher | so no 4 is the BH-2? Or no 1? No 3 is the U47? No 1 manley perhaps? Yeah no 4 is the Bh-2 I think. What a downer :( |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear | I will reveal the secret on Sunday. Till that time, enjoy the adventure ![]() |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 848
| Dudes! Thanks for the test! Made my friday. I have had the BH-2 in my studio and it was as bright as my Manley Ref C... No 4 IS the BH-2 and it does not sound good in this crowd, but costs a fraction of what most of the others do... I got some great sounds from the BH2, btw. Acc Guit, for instance. I did not keep it, only because it was too similar to my Manley, only not quite as good. I listened to the first five. Strange to have 6 mics, but only 5 to choose from... :-) My verdict: 1 Sounds the least involving and a bit boring an onedimentional to me. Could be i am influenced by the duller performance. Could it be the JZ47? 2 Is my fave for the more modern sound. A bit of bite and more top end. Not ideal for this retro vibe. I guess it is the Gold Ref 3 Is not bad at all. More vintage. Neumann vibe Prolly the u47. I love it for this song and singer! 4 BH-2. Sounds like crap in this test 5 I like this one a lot. It sounds almost 4 dBs louder, thoug. Vintage Neumann with PVC cap kind of vibe. But softer than no3. M49? I am dying to hear the real answers. Its education made fun! |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,705
| My preference in this order: 3, 5, 2, 4, 1 3 just sat in the mix well. A very sweet and intimate sound. It just sounds 'right'. 5 also had an intimate sound with a very preset low-mid. There's something about the quality of this mic I liked quite a bit. 2 had a good balance but felt a bit cottony during vocal contractions 4 an 'expensive' sounding mic but overly bright and inappropriate for this track. Sibilance was annoying. 1 this one wasn't 'bad'... but it just didn't grab me in any way and felt a bit lost among the other elements... a bit closed on the top. Look forward to the results! ![]() |
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 848
| Took a quick listen to the second test. The one called B/i4 sounds a lot different from the other two. Brighter and less Neumannesque. A too bright but if it is the BH-1 again (which i suspect), it fared slightly better in this test. Softer preamps help, I guess.. C / i7 sounds the best to me. u47? A / i3 sounds pretty close, but less exiting. JZ47? Hugs, |
| | |
| | #23 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 891
| didnt liked 2 and 5. is that your friend studio white walls? looks like crap but sounds nice. the #1. sounds brighter & more detailed. the #3 has the neumann u47 vintage tone. The #4 its between 3 and 1. strange. i like #1. more. the clips in your studio should had same song. i7 has the vintage tone. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,666
| 5 sounds much closer than the other ones: is it only due to the mic ? 1 and 4 are clearer, more present, than 2 and 3, 4 still more than 1. I prefer 3 with respect to 2. Thanks for sharing. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear | |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,666
| I could not tell a clear preference in test one. In test 2, it is a, more involving, which makes me want to sing with. I would say that b and c are more modern sounding ? |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear | I think those who wanted to listen have listened, so here is the revelation: Song 1: 1- Neumann U47 2- Neumann M49 3- JZ V47 4 - JZ BH2 5 - Manley Gold Song 2: a - JZ V47 b - JZ BH2 c - Horch RM2J ![]() |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear | Why did you have to rush with the answers... I just listened and liked 2 (sounds mixed already - meaning - most balanced) and 5 (much low mid character, maybe already too much for my taste) in the first song, the only one I liked in second song was C, the other two sounded "pushed" and unpleasant... so I guess Horch stays on my wishlist... Soft songs can be sung on many mics and sound good - at least average, but more dynamic singing is a much harder test for condensers... if you don't resort to dynamics for those occasions.. Can you post some more M49 - Horch tests? Possibly blind...
__________________ www.nimetu.org www.satoration.org "We tend to overestimate the effect of a technology in the short run and underestimate the effect in the long run." Roy Amara of the Institute for the Future |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: london
Posts: 5,852
| WOW! Very cool! Thanks for the test!! Seems I like that new JZ47V then...... ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Wagner U47 and Horch RM2J meeting in my studio :) | ISedlacek | High end | 19 | 8th January 2010 03:16 PM |
| U47 vs. M49 | MSR74 | So much gear, so little time! | 28 | 26th June 2008 09:45 AM |
| |