Avantone BV-1 vs Beesneez James - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Audio file upload / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests


Avantone BV-1 vs Beesneez James

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 20th January 2010   #1
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Avantone BV-1 vs Beesneez James

Several people have asked me to post a comparison between the James and the BV-1 on vocals.

Here's an old Dylan tune, recorded on one take with the BV-1 in cardioid, one with the BV-1 set to 2:00 on the pattern selector dial, and one with the James in cardioid. In fairness, I should probably try the James in a different pattern as well - hopefully I can do that at some point.

No guessing games - just the samples. No eq on the vocal tracks. Some sloppy finger picking from time to time.

www.johnnybregar.com/music/dtt-james.mp3
www.johnnybregar.com/music/dtt-BV-1.mp3
www.johnnybregar.com/music/dtt-BV-1-noncard.mp3 -- NEW FILE (based on SEB's recommendation to try two clicks toward figure 8.


Signal paths-
Vox: mic > Great River MP-2NV > Manley ELOP
Guitar: Gefell m300 > Great River MP-2NV > 1176

Cheers,

jb
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #2
Lives for gear
 
whereisbkp's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Location: Nevada City, CA
Posts: 659

interesting.
listening on sony headphones.
i like em both, but on this song i think i like the james.
whereisbkp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #3
Gear maniac
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 157

Thanks for posting Johnny!

Really interesting to hear the 2 mics on the same song.

I think I like the James better, the BV-1 has a bit too much high in it and sounds a little "cheaper". The James is also less sensitive for sibilance, something I'm looking for.

Great performance once again!
Skiggy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #4
Lives for gear
 
pasarski's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Finland
Posts: 845

James is a killer! BV-1 ain't bad either. It would be interesting though to know if there's a cheaper alternative for it, knowing the CV-12 thing.
pasarski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #5
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Whoops -

I forgot to mention an important factoid... I modded the James slightly to give it just a bit more low mid heft. I added a 33uf 25v capacitor between pin 3 and pin 5, as recommended by Ben. This gives it a little more body. The stock James is great, but I felt it needed this mod for my voice. The difference is subtle, but noticeable.

jb
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #6
Gear addict
 
vonrichter's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2009
Location: California
Posts: 469

James has more vibe+mojo for this song. I could see the BV-1 working for some other types of material.

Did you have someone do that mod, or did you do it yourself? I'm liking it compared to your older examples.
__________________
Cheers,
-VR
http://vonrichter.net
vonrichter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #7
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
I did the mod myself. It's very easy.
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #8
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
My thoughts on the two are that the BV-1 is much more real and representative of what I sound like. It does have just a bit of high end sheen on it. I like that - especially in a song with more instruments. The James does have it's place in a song like this in my opinion. This is why I have two vocal mics... :-)
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #9
SEB
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 321

I`ve got both mics, but to me the BV sounds a lot better at 2 o`clock than at 12 straight cardiode. At 12 I think it gets a little strident and distant. What position did you use on the PSU?Very nice voice you got there btw
__________________
seb
SEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th January 2010   #10
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEB View Post
I`ve got both mics, but to me the BV sounds a lot better at 2 o`clock than at 12 straight cardiode. At 12 I think it gets a little strident and distant. What position did you use on the PSU?Very nice voice you got there btw
12 o'clock on the PSU for this recording.

Thanks for the compliment. I'm actually a feeling little rusty vocally - I got bad a cold followed by pneumonia and this is the first I've sung for over 3 weeks.
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2010   #11
SEB
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 321

If you feel fit and have some minutes it would be really interesting hearing your voice at the BV`s 2 o´clock positions (two ticks to the right of cardiode). Maybe we`ll here an even better quality mic then. Just need a verse and a chorus of this Dylan tune.

Have you tried NOS tubes in the mic btw?

Please
SEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2010   #12
Gear nut
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 122

I vote for James.

Man I really dig your sense of vocal phrasing. Its so important. Singing is not just about nice vocal tone, its also about phrasing and the way you put the words into your phrases. You have a very relaxing phrasing feel. Thanks
deuce42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st January 2010   #13
Gear nut
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 78

Curious....did you track guitar and vocals together?

Thanks...
russchapman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd January 2010   #14
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Location: calgary canada
Posts: 963

I wonder if I could do the same thing with my Jade?And more importantly, would it be an improvement? Did you feel the mic in general lacked a bit of lower mid heft or was this mod based solely on the needs of your voice? By the way, I like your songs and recordings. Very nice.

Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnybregar View Post
Whoops -

I forgot to mention an important factoid... I modded the James slightly to give it just a bit more low mid heft. I added a 33uf 25v capacitor between pin 3 and pin 5, as recommended by Ben. This gives it a little more body. The stock James is great, but I felt it needed this mod for my voice. The difference is subtle, but noticeable.

jb
lynyrd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2010   #15
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
No - which is why the guitar often runs over the vox at the beginning of the verses. I often do record both at the same time and I actually finger pick better when I do, but for this demo - I really wanted to have the vocals only on one track because the bleed was going to effect things too much.


Quote:
Originally Posted by russchapman View Post
Curious....did you track guitar and vocals together?

Thanks...
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2010   #16
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by lynyrd View Post
I wonder if I could do the same thing with my Jade?And more importantly, would it be an improvement? Did you feel the mic in general lacked a bit of lower mid heft or was this mod based solely on the needs of your voice? By the way, I like your songs and recordings. Very nice.
Possibly - just email Ben. Yes - I made the mod for a bit more low end heft and I really feel like it was the right move. I like it much more now. It's a super easy mod - less than 10 minutes from beginning to end - and most of that is just taking the body apart and making sure you're about to solder the cap in the right place...
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2010   #17
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by deuce42 View Post
I vote for James.

Man I really dig your sense of vocal phrasing. Its so important. Singing is not just about nice vocal tone, its also about phrasing and the way you put the words into your phrases. You have a very relaxing phrasing feel. Thanks
Thanks Deuce42 - I completely agree about vocal phrasing. It's taken me a lot of years to figure that out, and to figure out how to hang back just a little bit behind the beat. When vocals push the beat I get all twitchy....
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2010   #18
Lives for gear
 
tapehiss's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,909

thanks so much for this comparison...

i've been really interested in the james and have used the bv-1 a bit..

its nice to see how they compare...

have you used a pearlman tm1?????

if so how does it compare to the james????
(also, you had mentioned using a wunder 47gt, how is that compared to the james?)
tapehiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2010   #19
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by tapehiss View Post

have you used a pearlman tm1?????

if so how does it compare to the james????
(also, you had mentioned using a wunder 47gt, how is that compared to the james?)
I did a record with the Pearlman. To me sounds a little more mid-forward than the james, and has a sweet high end. For my voice the mids were just a little over the top with the Pearlman and I was always cutting them around 900Hz.

The Wunder CM7gt is nothing short of amazing. It was just a little too rich for my blood and I sold it. It's got all the creamy midrange and sweet highs you could ever want. It's a great mic. If I come in to a bunch of money it's probably the first bit of gear I'll buy back.

jb
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2010   #20
bee
Lives for gear
 
bee's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,500

Thanks for the post. Does the James cost more than the BV-1?
bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2010   #21
Lives for gear
 
tapehiss's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Location: Washington
Posts: 1,909

yes.

the james comes to about $1.5k dollars, the BV-1 is $995, and one of the best tube mics under $1k IMO.

however, i really have been desiring a sibilant-lacking mic such as the james,, and i hear that is one of its strong points.
tapehiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th January 2010   #22
SEB
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 321

The BV-1 will be less sibilant if you care to use something else than plain cardioide. Cardioide sounds a little brittle and thin to my ears. Turn it clockwise a notch or two and you get a lot fuller sound -compares nicely to enything else I`ve tried, and yes I`ve got the James too.
SEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25th January 2010   #23
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by SEB View Post
If you feel fit and have some minutes it would be really interesting hearing your voice at the BV`s 2 o´clock positions (two ticks to the right of cardiode). Maybe we`ll here an even better quality mic then. Just need a verse and a chorus of this Dylan tune.

Have you tried NOS tubes in the mic btw?

Please
Hi SEB -

I haven't had time to try this yet - crazy dayz.... I hope I can post another clip with the adjusted pattern for you.
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th January 2010   #24
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Just tried the BV-1 on this song with the pattern selector at about 2:00. It sounds quite a lot thicker.... I will post a clip as soon as I'm over this cold.
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2010   #25
bee
Lives for gear
 
bee's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,500

I think both these mics sound great on you Johnny. Have you had a chance to try them out on other instruments?
bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th January 2010   #26
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by bee View Post
I think both these mics sound great on you Johnny. Have you had a chance to try them out on other instruments?
Yes - I like the James on acoustic guitar a lot. I'm not convinced the BV-1 is a great acoustic mic yet - need more time with it.

James sounds excellent on mandolin, banjo and I like it as a room mic. Still really haven't run the BV-1 through all the paces but I have captured some nice clean electric guitar with it that was pretty slick.
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2010   #27
Lives for gear
 
johnnybregar's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 509

Thread Starter
I added a third file with the BV-1 pattern selector set to 2:00 (2 notches clockwise from cardioid). I like it - see what you think.

www.johnnybregar.com/music/dtt-BV-1-noncard.mp3
johnnybregar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2010   #28
bee
Lives for gear
 
bee's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,500

That BV-1 sounds like excellent mic for the money.
bee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2010   #29
SEB
Gear addict
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: Norway
Posts: 321

Yep that`s more like it - all the "fissines" is gone, thick and juicy!

All earlier listeners should have a go one more time and see what they think. For me this is the first Chinamerica-mic that`s totally worth it at any price. The only drawback; it´s a heavy mf!!

We should try it out with some NOS tubes and see what happens!

On the othe hand: The suitcase is nice but I really think it should be an option. Maybe a little less glamorous cardboard packaging would be enough for many buyers saving the environment for the pollution and the users for some bucks. How often do we really need this suitcase?
SEB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th January 2010   #30
Lives for gear
 
didier.brest's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791

I well believe that the BV1 may be closer to the truth but your voice is so deep with the James... I still prefer the James even with respect to your last BV1 samples.

Great song, great voice, great mic! Thank you very much for sharing.

(I put y the James take in my 'Hits' directory. )

By the way, which James is it?
didier.brest is online now   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wunder CM7 vs Beesneez T1 vs U87i vs Beesneez James anguswoodhead Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests 148 13th March 2012 12:19 AM
Beesneez James johnnybregar Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests 23 1st January 2010 12:54 PM
I was going to buy a Beesneez James... Fastermouse So much gear, so little time! 64 7th December 2009 10:00 PM
Beesneez James Mic Kumbari Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests 0 27th August 2009 05:45 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.