Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Audio file upload / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 21st November 2009, 10:13 AM   #1
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
U67 & U87, C800G, AT4050, Flea 47 and Swedien No.1

At the Dutch gearslutz party in October we did a mic shootout with some LDC's.

In this comparitive test we positioned all microphones at the same spot. So what you hear is not the best a microphone can sound with this particular guitar. It is more a microphone character shootout.

chain: Neve 1073 > Focusrite AD > PTHD (24bits/96kHz conv. 16bits/44.1kHz). We kept the gain the same for all mics; leveling in PT (appr.+/- 2dB).

With many thanks to Martin Kantola, who gave us the opportunity to try out his new Bruce Swedien No.1. Patrick, thanks for bringing the Flea.
Attached Files
File Type: wav AT4050 - strum edit.wav (3.35 MB, 443 views)
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 10:26 AM   #2
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
Patrick's Flea 47
Attached Files
File Type: wav Flea U47 - strum edit.wav (3.33 MB, 306 views)
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 10:28 AM   #3
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
Our beloved U67
Attached Files
File Type: wav Neumann U 67 - strum edit.wav (3.01 MB, 317 views)
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 10:31 AM   #4
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
This is a U87
Attached Files
File Type: wav Neumann U87 - strum edit.wav (3.16 MB, 303 views)
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 10:35 AM   #5
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
Sony's tube mic
Attached Files
File Type: wav Sony C800G - strum edit.wav (3.30 MB, 285 views)
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 10:38 AM   #6
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
Martin's microphonic version of a man with a moustache
Attached Files
File Type: wav Swedien No1 - strum edit.wav (3.30 MB, 269 views)
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 03:14 PM   #7
didier.brest
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 513
My preference order

1 Swedien
2 C800
3 U67
4 FLEA 47
5 U87

and distant from these five ones

6 4050

Thank you for sharing.
didier.brest is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 05:24 PM   #8
BrianHanke
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 386
After listening on monitors and headphones, here are my choices:

1. U 87 (smooth and natural, perfectly balanced, good integration of the high range of the guitar into the rest of the sound)
2. FLEA 47 (same as above, but slightly less natural sounding)
3. C800G (a pleasing sound, but perhaps a bit too bright)
4. Swedien No. 1 (musical, but a bit unnatural sounding, perhaps too dark)
5. AT4050 (slightly veiled, unexciting but very useable)
6. U 67 (way too punchy and aggressive, too much low end)

Thanks for the interesting comparison! Just one question: is this a vintage U 87 or a new one?
BrianHanke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21st November 2009, 06:25 PM   #9
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
A new one (of a stereo pair). Although the new U87's sounds a bit different than the older ones, I think they are equal in quality.

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrianHanke View Post
5. AT4050 (slightly veiled, unexciting but very useable)
indeed
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd November 2009, 08:47 AM   #10
badboymusic
Lives for gear
 
badboymusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 714
I actually preferred the AT4050 myself.
badboymusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd November 2009, 04:54 AM   #11
Storyville
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Philly/New York
Posts: 1,972
Here's my list.

1) U87 - I'm not an 87 fanboy, but I definitely think this had the best capture. Very open, very clear, natural. Defined, evenly balanced.

2) The 67 - it had woofy lows, but I think that gave it a certain body and attitude. If this was solo guitar and voice type of song, I would probably prefer the 67 as my first choice. However, in terms of mix content, I know I'm gonna have to suck those lows.

3) The flea 47. A little "warmer" than the 87, and little less woofy than the 67. This would be my second choice for "in the mix" mic, and second choice for solo guitar and voice. Depending on the context I might consider this over the 87 in the mix - it's a little blurrier, but holds the low mids a bit more. But most tracks I'd probably take the 87 first.

4) The Swedien No1 - The transients popped a little too hard for me - otherwise it was very similar to the 87. I just know it's going to need a little cleaning come mix time with that top end and those spikey strings.

5) c800G - this one had a little less of the transient that the Swedien had, but it also sounded hollower. This would be my last choice in either the mix or solo scenario except....

6) the AT4050 - I thought this one sounded unnatural. Cartoony. The upper mid pushed feels artificial and blurry. A little too sleepy sounding.
__________________
http://www.gearslutz.com/board/rap-h...ng-vocals.html

"A great work is made out of a combination of obedience and liberty" - Nadia Boulanger, brought to my attention by RyanC.
Storyville is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 02:39 AM   #12
DONNX
Lives for gear
 
DONNX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: EN DA STOOL DEE YO G!
Posts: 3,442
As far as everything being only solo acoustic (not in the mix with other instruments or voice) The U87 was sounded the best to me. But I know many pros that swear by and used the AT 4050 for acoustic guitar recording with great success, (not solo so much) but as a mic used on the ac guitar and the ac guitar is part of the big mix picture (bass, drums, voice, keyboard,etc). I guess it does well it that picture more so.

Like the Sony and Flea as well. Thanks for the post.
DONNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 10:18 AM   #13
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
Quote:
Originally Posted by DONNX View Post
As far as everything being only solo acoustic (not in the mix with other instruments or voice) The U87 was sounded the best to me. But I know many pros that swear by and used the AT 4050 for acoustic guitar recording with great success, (not solo so much) but as a mic used on the ac guitar and the ac guitar is part of the big mix picture (bass, drums, voice, keyboard,etc). I guess it does well it that picture more so.
You're right of course.

Roughly,
I think the 4050 is a good acoustic guitar mic for pop and country pop, at least when it's role is harmonic/rhytmic in the background.
I would choose the Swedien for a high end pop sound with a very good guitar player.
The U87 is great for music in the rock/indie realm when it doesn't have leading role. Otherwise I would go for the U67 or U47, as I would with singer/songwriters.
I didn't like the Sony very much (with this guitar).

The U67 sounds for me most expressive and real.
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 08:45 PM   #14
Tonear
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 37
Thanks for the fine work.
My preferences:
1. U67. Sorry to be redundant, but it still is the most natural and usable sound of this crowd.
2. Tie between the U87 and Flea. They both needed a bit of EQ but the character was excellent on both. That Flea is interesting.
3. Didn't care for the clanky pick attack of the Swedien
4. The Sony was too bright for me, but some folks like that in a track.
5. AT is not as present or natural as any of the others.

These audio shootouts are terrific and informative. All the posts in the world can't take the place of the actual sound.
Cheers, John
Tonear is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th November 2009, 09:00 PM   #15
DONNX
Lives for gear
 
DONNX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: EN DA STOOL DEE YO G!
Posts: 3,442
Whats funny is I went back and listen to these files at the end of each. When I first did my listen on these, it was only the first 1/2 of the clips. As the music progressed the mic performed differently on some mics.

Perhaps, the musician's movement caused the mic to be placed differently during the take? And of course the files were different takes.

Mic placement has a huge play in the recorded sound as we all know. The 4050 is quite a nice deal and works great on the strumming, etc. I liked more on the last half of the file.

And we haven't even touched the preamp, limiter, converter, realm which changes the sound as well. Nor type of guitar..which are like singers. IME, all guitars sound different and thus change the desired mic.

The U67 seemed louder than the rest. That can easily be perceived as "better" for some. Regardless of the volume, I like it as well.

I would be happy to use any of these mics at a session.


Quote:
Originally Posted by Joram View Post
You're right of course.

Roughly,
I think the 4050 is a good acoustic guitar mic for pop and country pop, at least when it's role is harmonic/rhytmic in the background.
I would choose the Swedien for a high end pop sound with a very good guitar player.
The U87 is great for music in the rock/indie realm when it doesn't have leading role. Otherwise I would go for the U67 or U47, as I would with singer/songwriters.
I didn't like the Sony very much (with this guitar).

The U67 sounds for me most expressive and real.
DONNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29th November 2009, 01:49 PM   #16
Joram
Gear addict
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 480
Send a message via MSN to Joram
Quote:
Originally Posted by DONNX View Post
Mic placement has a huge play in the recorded sound as we all know.
You're very right. That's why I stated in the intial post: what you hear is not the best a microphone can sound with this particular guitar. It is more a microphone character shootout.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DONNX View Post
The U67 seemed louder than the rest. That can easily be perceived as "better" for some.
It is impossible to get the levels even as the sound of the mics differ too much. It always good to listen to these shootouts at different levels.
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th November 2009, 12:58 PM   #17
alvagoldbook
Gear maniac
 
alvagoldbook's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 172
my first pick was the Swedien. Sounded the most open and natural to me.

Second pick would have to be the U87, but sounded a bit too dark.

Third, the U67, which seemed to have an annoying high end on this guitar that I didn't like.

Forth, the Sony, which just sounded bad.

I'm listening on my laptop though, but I prefer listening to shootouts on subpar more commercial speaker systems.
alvagoldbook is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2009, 03:39 AM   #18
Emanuel23
Gear Head
 
Emanuel23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 63
Thank you for this shoot-out!

1st - AT 4050 (although I would use a tube preamp in this case)
2nd - Swedien / Flea47 / U67
3rd - U87 (would place it differently)
4th - C800 (would not consider it)
Emanuel23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2009, 11:16 AM   #19
MC Blind
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 441
1 U67 It just sounds like a record.

2 U87 This one was close to my 3rd and 4th picks.

3 Swedien Number 1 (I guess I would re-name it number 3 in this case, chuckle, chuckle)

4 Flea 47

5 AT 4050

6 Sony C800G

P.S. On a side note if you've never tried the Baby Blue Bottle with the Blue Robbie mic pre on acoustic guitar you are missing out. Try it, you won't regret it!
MC Blind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th December 2009, 08:22 PM   #20
Shy
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 463
Thumbs up

Thanks for the samples.
Love the U 67 and U 87.
Shy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9th January 2010, 08:44 AM   #21
payne104
Gear Head
 
payne104's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 37
I can definately see preferring different ones depending on what song called for. As far as clarity I preffered the swedien, but I like the way the u47 is a little rounded off and dark and might let the vocal ring though nicely. But you might as well use the swedien and then eq it down a tad when the vocals come in.

The swedien is very lifelike to me in a pleasant way
payne104 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Flea 47 & flea c-12 Kristian High end 19 14th December 2008 02:00 PM
U87 vs. C800g for rock vocals m1a1x1e1r1 High end 11 19th September 2007 07:02 AM
U87 to U67 Conversion? ToneBender67 High end 13 2nd April 2007 10:29 PM
Neumann U67 vs. U87 DaveC High end 28 8th November 2006 03:44 AM
U67 vs. U87 Matt Grondin High end 29 18th July 2005 07:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
You Rated this Thread: