![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
| Register | FAQ | Merch | Tips & Techniques | Video Vault | Books & DVD's | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear addict | U67 & U87, C800G, AT4050, Flea 47 and Swedien No.1 At the Dutch gearslutz party in October we did a mic shootout with some LDC's. In this comparitive test we positioned all microphones at the same spot. So what you hear is not the best a microphone can sound with this particular guitar. It is more a microphone character shootout. chain: Neve 1073 > Focusrite AD > PTHD (24bits/96kHz conv. 16bits/44.1kHz). We kept the gain the same for all mics; leveling in PT (appr.+/- 2dB). With many thanks to Martin Kantola, who gave us the opportunity to try out his new Bruce Swedien No.1. Patrick, thanks for bringing the Flea.
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict | Patrick's Flea 47
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear addict | Our beloved U67
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Gear addict | This is a U87
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Gear addict | Sony's tube mic
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear addict | Martin's microphonic version of a man with a moustache
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 513
| My preference order 1 Swedien 2 C800 3 U67 4 FLEA 47 5 U87 and distant from these five ones 6 4050 Thank you for sharing. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Burbank, CA
Posts: 386
| After listening on monitors and headphones, here are my choices: 1. U 87 (smooth and natural, perfectly balanced, good integration of the high range of the guitar into the rest of the sound) 2. FLEA 47 (same as above, but slightly less natural sounding) 3. C800G (a pleasing sound, but perhaps a bit too bright) 4. Swedien No. 1 (musical, but a bit unnatural sounding, perhaps too dark) 5. AT4050 (slightly veiled, unexciting but very useable) 6. U 67 (way too punchy and aggressive, too much low end) Thanks for the interesting comparison! Just one question: is this a vintage U 87 or a new one? |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear addict | A new one (of a stereo pair). Although the new U87's sounds a bit different than the older ones, I think they are equal in quality. indeed
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 714
| I actually preferred the AT4050 myself. |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2008 Location: Philly/New York
Posts: 1,972
| Here's my list. 1) U87 - I'm not an 87 fanboy, but I definitely think this had the best capture. Very open, very clear, natural. Defined, evenly balanced. 2) The 67 - it had woofy lows, but I think that gave it a certain body and attitude. If this was solo guitar and voice type of song, I would probably prefer the 67 as my first choice. However, in terms of mix content, I know I'm gonna have to suck those lows. 3) The flea 47. A little "warmer" than the 87, and little less woofy than the 67. This would be my second choice for "in the mix" mic, and second choice for solo guitar and voice. Depending on the context I might consider this over the 87 in the mix - it's a little blurrier, but holds the low mids a bit more. But most tracks I'd probably take the 87 first. 4) The Swedien No1 - The transients popped a little too hard for me - otherwise it was very similar to the 87. I just know it's going to need a little cleaning come mix time with that top end and those spikey strings. 5) c800G - this one had a little less of the transient that the Swedien had, but it also sounded hollower. This would be my last choice in either the mix or solo scenario except.... 6) the AT4050 - I thought this one sounded unnatural. Cartoony. The upper mid pushed feels artificial and blurry. A little too sleepy sounding.
__________________ http://www.gearslutz.com/board/rap-h...ng-vocals.html "A great work is made out of a combination of obedience and liberty" - Nadia Boulanger, brought to my attention by RyanC. |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: EN DA STOOL DEE YO G!
Posts: 3,442
| As far as everything being only solo acoustic (not in the mix with other instruments or voice) The U87 was sounded the best to me. But I know many pros that swear by and used the AT 4050 for acoustic guitar recording with great success, (not solo so much) but as a mic used on the ac guitar and the ac guitar is part of the big mix picture (bass, drums, voice, keyboard,etc). I guess it does well it that picture more so. Like the Sony and Flea as well. Thanks for the post. |
| | |
| | #13 | |
| Gear addict | Quote:
Roughly, I think the 4050 is a good acoustic guitar mic for pop and country pop, at least when it's role is harmonic/rhytmic in the background. I would choose the Swedien for a high end pop sound with a very good guitar player. The U87 is great for music in the rock/indie realm when it doesn't have leading role. Otherwise I would go for the U67 or U47, as I would with singer/songwriters. I didn't like the Sony very much (with this guitar). The U67 sounds for me most expressive and real.
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record | |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 37
| Thanks for the fine work. My preferences: 1. U67. Sorry to be redundant, but it still is the most natural and usable sound of this crowd. 2. Tie between the U87 and Flea. They both needed a bit of EQ but the character was excellent on both. That Flea is interesting. 3. Didn't care for the clanky pick attack of the Swedien 4. The Sony was too bright for me, but some folks like that in a track. 5. AT is not as present or natural as any of the others. These audio shootouts are terrific and informative. All the posts in the world can't take the place of the actual sound. Cheers, John |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: EN DA STOOL DEE YO G!
Posts: 3,442
| Whats funny is I went back and listen to these files at the end of each. When I first did my listen on these, it was only the first 1/2 of the clips. As the music progressed the mic performed differently on some mics. Perhaps, the musician's movement caused the mic to be placed differently during the take? And of course the files were different takes. Mic placement has a huge play in the recorded sound as we all know. The 4050 is quite a nice deal and works great on the strumming, etc. I liked more on the last half of the file. And we haven't even touched the preamp, limiter, converter, realm which changes the sound as well. Nor type of guitar..which are like singers. IME, all guitars sound different and thus change the desired mic. The U67 seemed louder than the rest. That can easily be perceived as "better" for some. Regardless of the volume, I like it as well. I would be happy to use any of these mics at a session. Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #16 | |
| Gear addict | Quote:
It is impossible to get the levels even as the sound of the mics differ too much. It always good to listen to these shootouts at different levels.
__________________ www.joram-in-bits.com www.legacystudio.nl http://www.myspace.com/joram_mix_record | |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 172
| my first pick was the Swedien. Sounded the most open and natural to me. Second pick would have to be the U87, but sounded a bit too dark. Third, the U67, which seemed to have an annoying high end on this guitar that I didn't like. Forth, the Sony, which just sounded bad. I'm listening on my laptop though, but I prefer listening to shootouts on subpar more commercial speaker systems. |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Ghent, Belgium
Posts: 63
| Thank you for this shoot-out! 1st - AT 4050 (although I would use a tube preamp in this case) 2nd - Swedien / Flea47 / U67 3rd - U87 (would place it differently) 4th - C800 (would not consider it) |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 441
| 1 U67 It just sounds like a record. 2 U87 This one was close to my 3rd and 4th picks. 3 Swedien Number 1 (I guess I would re-name it number 3 in this case, chuckle, chuckle) 4 Flea 47 5 AT 4050 6 Sony C800G P.S. On a side note if you've never tried the Baby Blue Bottle with the Blue Robbie mic pre on acoustic guitar you are missing out. Try it, you won't regret it! |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 463
| Thanks for the samples. Love the U 67 and U 87. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Jun 2009 Location: Van Nuys
Posts: 37
| I can definately see preferring different ones depending on what song called for. As far as clarity I preffered the swedien, but I like the way the u47 is a little rounded off and dark and might let the vocal ring though nicely. But you might as well use the swedien and then eq it down a tad when the vocals come in. The swedien is very lifelike to me in a pleasant way |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Flea 47 & flea c-12 | Kristian | High end | 19 | 14th December 2008 02:00 PM |
| U87 vs. C800g for rock vocals | m1a1x1e1r1 | High end | 11 | 19th September 2007 07:02 AM |
| U87 to U67 Conversion? | ToneBender67 | High end | 13 | 2nd April 2007 10:29 PM |
| Neumann U67 vs. U87 | DaveC | High end | 28 | 8th November 2006 03:44 AM |
| U67 vs. U87 | Matt Grondin | High end | 29 | 18th July 2005 07:48 PM |