![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter | Six cardio SDC pairs on grand piano
Each take is with the same mic placement, beside the tail end, 1.4 m above the floor, 19 cm AB steered to the pianist. The mics are (listed by alphabetic order, not the order for the numbering of the files) Audio-Technica 4041 Josephson C42 Oktava MK-012 Rode NT5 Samson CO2 (super-cardioid) Schoeps MK21 (wide cardioid) I will tell you by PM who are the mics of the files that you will rank. ![]() Edit: I replaced 4 and 5 by a version with about 1 dB gain more for better balance with the other ones. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2003 Location: Europe
Posts: 2,428
|
Even more mics - wow! I love your tests Didier but it's a real shame you don't post them as WAVs. I think with the kind of broadband internet speeds that everyone has these day there's no longer any need to compress audio - especially with critical listening like this.
__________________ James Lehmann Voice-Over Artist - Project Studio Jockey www.jameslehmann.net · Use your real name - keep Gearslutz authoritative, accountable and courteous. · Stop the superlatives madness - just say no to gear threads with the word 'best' in the title. · Words or WAVs? The former are interesting, the latter are convincing. |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
Hi James, here included the link for mic 1 wav file. Could you let me know if it makes a significant difference with respect to 256 kbps mp3 to your ears? If it does, I will also upload the wavs for the 5 remaining mic pairs. I uploaded the MP3s because I was not sure to ear a difference, which if any would be for me negligible with respect to the difference between two mics. I wanted to save storage capacity and bandwidth for Gearslutz. Moreover I just was made aware that the wav file limit for upload to Gearslutz is 6 MB, just a bit more than 30s in 2 x 44.1 kHz x 16 bit. So it's a truncated version of the previous mp3. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jul 2003 Location: Europe
Posts: 2,428
|
Hi Didier, On close listening I find the high Db 'rings' too much in the mp3 version - the WAV version seems softer and more realistic with more 'bloom' and room sound. I suspect there would be even more difference with the 24-bit original. I'd like to help with file-hosting but you'd need to email me the clips first and I'm not sure I could do them all. Maybe someone else could help Didier get these excellent WAVs hosted? |
| | |
| | #5 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Lives for gear |
I made quick comparison of the MP3 files through my Sennheiser hd650. Overall I preferred 3. That said - we have to remember it's only lo-level [piano/pianissimo] piano sounds we're comparing here! So how these would fare under louder sound pressure, we don't know! :: Mads
__________________ ¤ Sound and Visual Art ¤ ¤ Risk Recording ¤ |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
I just PM you the key. We agree that such a test is just revealing the relative performances of the microphones on my piano, in my room, for this microphone placement and on this music. Nonetheless, I hope that it is interesting. |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Lives for gear | Absolutely - thanks very much for the PM One more thing Didier, when you say "beside the tail end", what exactly do mean? More or less like the attached image [from Decca] To get an idea of the instrument, do you have a photo maybe? :: Mads |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
The placement of the microphones is quite close to the one of your picture but they are steered towards the middle of the keyboard rather than to its left end. See attached picture where the microphones are different from the ones in the test and placed 20 cm higher.
|
| | |
| | #10 |
| Lives for gear |
Thanks for the extra info+image [Yes the microphones are different and I reckon you didn't use the anti-reflection screen, as seen in the image, in this SDC test either] :: Mads |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
Yes, I used also the anti-reflection filter in the test. I have got a better result than without but not sufficient to remove the small room signature.
|
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 410
|
This is Nocturne in C sharp minor (no opus number) by Chopin, one of my favourite piano pieces. None of the recordings sounded bad. I'd say 1 was the best. 5 was strange, somehow 2d and not hi-fi to my ears but it sounded more "fun". ![]() 2 wasn't as clear as others. Anyway, I could imagine buying the one I get for the cheapest. |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
Yes, it is this nocturne made famous especially by the film The Pianist. I just send to you 2 PMs. |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2007 Location: Durham, NC
Posts: 1,417
|
3 seemed like it gives a bit more I think 2 is the Josephsons, a little brighter The other 4 seemed to do the job equally as well in a little bit different way though...I like the way your piano sounds on all of them...really cool cam |
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2008 Location: Europe
Posts: 553
|
I liked 3 and 1 the most. The coloration renders the recording a nice piano sound. There are slight volume differences between files, but that's normal.
|
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
Thank you for your participation. I just send to you both the key. The levels L/R in dBFS 1: -31.3 / -31.3 2: -30.9 / -31.5 3: -30.7 / -30.8 4: -31.9 / -32.1 5: -32 / -31.5 6: -31.1 / -31.2 4 and 5 miss about 1 dB. ![]() I am going to correct that. |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jun 2008 Location: Europe
Posts: 553
|
Don't worry, Didier. It's a fine job you did here! |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Apr 2003 Location: L.A.
Posts: 2,122
|
Nice ![]() I liked 3,4,5 the most. Could you send me a pm? Thanks! |
| | |
| | #19 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
Done. |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Gear addict Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 410
|
Maybe it's time to reveal the answers? Anyway, in two of your tests I've chosen a mic from a manufacturer I never thought I'd like, based on what I had heard from other people. |
| | |
| | #21 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
I think that it is better to let the people listening this as a blind test. The listening is not the same when one knows which is the microphone. Anybody interested in who is who has just to put a post here. (Send me a PM if you are not keen to share your mind here.)
|
| | |
| | #22 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009 Location: VT
Posts: 885
|
Seeing I bought the MK-012s a few days before you started this, and I love them, please PM me the results. I won't spoil the fun. thanks! |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
PM send. Yes the Oktavas are nice microphones but often better with their omni caps. You can listen to them in my omni SDC shoot-out. |
| | |
| | #24 |
| Gear nut Joined: Jul 2009 Location: NY
Posts: 116
|
I like #2 and #5 best. please PM me.
|
| | |
| | #25 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
Done. |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Feb 2009 Location: VT
Posts: 885
| |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear |
PM the answers please? Very interested, as I have Oktava 012's, Schoeps CMC64's, and others. Liked #1 the least, others were closer...might say #2 or #6 were my fav, or maybe #3... |
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
Done. |
| | |
| | #29 |
| Gear interested Joined: Jul 2009
Posts: 14
|
Didier, You certainly did an outstanding job; all 6 are great piano recordings. Because I have not heard the actual piano sound, I can not say which one records the most accurately, but can only compare them in relative terms: #4 seems to have the most audible distortion in loud passages, followed by #6. These are the only two of the bunch that have audible distortions. #1, #3, and #5 are on the bright side, with the #5 being the brightest. #2 is on the dark side. Overall I like the #1 and #3 best, followed by #2. Can you please PM me the key - Thanks. Last edited by Maxjames; 14th July 2009 at 12:23 AM.. Reason: Added words in bold per my notes taken last evening |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,791
Thread Starter |
Done. Thank you for your great report! |
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Modartt PianoTEQ, NI Akoustik Piano, Garritan Concert Grand Piano, Synthology Ivory | Jake Holland | Music computers | 51 | 26th January 2012 09:38 PM |
| Grand Piano or Virtual Piano?? Who Has Both??? | JohnnyTonk | High end | 46 | 12th June 2010 06:27 PM |
| motif xs concert grand piano vs piano software and hooking it up | ayp | Music computers | 5 | 21st August 2007 08:34 PM |
| |