Mogami vs Belden - Critical Listening Test, Clean Out Your Ears! - Gearslutz.com

Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Audio file upload / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests


Mogami vs Belden - Critical Listening Test, Clean Out Your Ears!

View Poll Results: Which cable do you prefer
I prefer A 27 36.00%
I prefer B 20 26.67%
I hear no difference 28 37.33%
Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll

New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 26th October 2008   #1
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Mogami vs Belden - Critical Listening Test, Clean Out Your Ears!

Is there a sonic difference between cable brands/types?

What about with line cables and snakes?

This simple A/B test intends to compare the sonic differences between two different standard cable brands.

The two contenders:

1. Belden/CBI 2BF 20ft Dsub Snake
2. Mogami 3162 110ohm 20ft Digital/Audio Cable

The Mogami cable is a dual purpose digital/audio cable and is supposed to perform better than standard cable due to the tighter impedance tolerances.

Like most of my test you'll get multiple files labeled "A" and "B". The cable type will be consistent between files meaning...

If the Mogami is "A" it will be "A" for ALL files. Likewise, if the Mogami is "B" it will be "B" for ALL files.

Test was done using a Lynx Aurora 16, 44.1khz on Internal Clock.

This is a critical listening test. The differences, if any, will likely not be drastic. I recommend focusing on just one part of the performance... a guitar, or bell, or piano, or cymbal splash .. to extract the subtleties.

So do you hear a difference? Which do you prefer, A or B? Why?
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008   #2
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Attached Files
File Type: wav Pink Floyd - A.wav (4.89 MB, 751 views)
File Type: wav Pink Floyd - B.wav (4.89 MB, 640 views)
File Type: wav Miles Davis - A.wav (5.63 MB, 329 views)
File Type: wav Miles Davis - B.wav (5.63 MB, 303 views)
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008   #3
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Attached Files
File Type: wav Coldplay - A.wav (4.97 MB, 355 views)
File Type: wav Coldplay - B.wav (4.97 MB, 316 views)
File Type: wav Ken Andrews - A.wav (5.00 MB, 116 views)
File Type: wav Ken Andrews - B.wav (5.00 MB, 106 views)
File Type: wav Palo Alto - A.wav (4.90 MB, 127 views)
File Type: wav Palo Alto - B.wav (4.90 MB, 123 views)
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008   #4
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,978

Question

WOW,
here, the:
A sounds brighter, "complete"
B sounds like old radio. "incomplete/missing harmonics/hold back"

what software are you usign ?
this cable test is for AES/EBU test?
or audio test?
space2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008   #5
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by space2012 View Post
WOW,

what software are you usign ?
this cable test is for AES/EBU test?
or audio test?
I use Nuendo.

This is an AUDIO test.

The mogami are AES/EBU cables that I'm using for audio.... they're supposed to be better because of less impedance...

The Belden's are just standard audio cable.

Thanks for sharing your opinion!
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008   #6
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,978

Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by norman_nomad View Post
I use Nuendo.

This is an AUDIO test.

The mogami are AES/EBU cables that I'm using for audio.... they're supposed to be better because of less impedance...

The Belden's are just standard audio cable.

Thanks for sharing your opinion!
Hi.

how do you connect the aurora to your pc?
what sound card did you used ?
what brand model of cables are used for AES/EBU ?
are you usign ADAT? and you have the lt-adat card inside aurora.

Thanks
space2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th October 2008   #7
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by space2012 View Post
Hi.

how do you connect the aurora to your pc?
what sound card did you used ?
what brand model of cables are used for AES/EBU ?
are you usign ADAT? and you have the lt-adat card inside aurora.

Thanks
Via RME AES-32, using Mogami AES/EBU cables.
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #8
Gear addict
 
drosophila's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 321

I liked B the most, based mostly on the Coldplay track. The sound was maybe a touch less detailed, but a bit warmer and more relaxing to listen to. I'm guessing this is the standard Belden cable?
drosophila is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #9
Lives for gear
 
zak7's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 756

Do not get it! are you comparing Digital audio cables and analog cables???????????????????

Please, can you explain this??
zak7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #10
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by zak7 View Post
Do not get it! are you comparing Digital audio cables and analog cables???????????????????

Please, can you explain this??
No.

BOTH cables are being used for AUDIO.

The mogami is a digital cable that I'm using for AUDIO.

Many people claim that digital cable is better for audio because of the tighter impedance tolerance which is supposed to be better for high frequencies.

norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #11
3 + infractions, forum membership suspended.
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,978

Question

can you use the original wave file ?
Rosetta 200 Vs Aurora 16 Shout Out The "test"

Rosetta 200 Vs Aurora 16 Shout Out The "test"

to know how different are two diferent auroras ?

it seems thers big diferences from unit to unit in other brands with same models.

Thanks
space2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #12
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by space2012 View Post
can you use the original wave file ?
Rosetta 200 Vs Aurora 16 Shout Out The "test"

Rosetta 200 Vs Aurora 16 Shout Out The "test"

to know how different are two diferent auroras ?

it seems thers big diferences from unit to unit in other brands with same models.

Thanks
OK... I ran the file. I'll PM you the link. I don't want to mix things up with this thread. You're welcome to post the wav file, or part of the wave file in the other thread if you want.

One thing I'll say is that his wav files all did something weird... they were drifting out of phase from the original and I suspect he either had some strange clock settings going on or sample capture settings or something...

My file is sample for sample locked to the original.
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #13
Lives for gear
 
World Studios's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 861

A sounds more open and hi fi, and B comes off a bit warmer. I would go for A with most sources.
__________________
Johan Bejerholm
World Studios
Malmö, Sweden

www.worldstudios.se
World Studios is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #14
Lives for gear
 
pw8888's Avatar
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Location: Europe...
Posts: 565

"A" better for me.much open ,larger.....
pw8888 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #15
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582

Wait, I thought all cables sounded the same... Just kidding.

Brad
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #16
Lives for gear
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,960

And you all listen blind and score 10/10?




/Peter
Audiop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #17
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad McGowan View Post
Wait, I thought all cables sounded the same... Just kidding.

Brad
I think that's what we're trying to figure out!
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #18
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582

I was totally joking. For the record I'm a big proponent of Evidence Audio cables, which eats Mogami for breakfast and lunch.

Can you please post the raw files so that we have a reference? To me the ideal cable is invisible to the audio. A lesser cable will act as a filter and add distortion.

There is definitely an audible difference between the files, and I'm only listening on crappy $5 headphones. I hear a more neutral frequency response on B. There seems to be better separation between instruments and a more detailed sound. The midrange on A seems to more of a hyped feeling which at first seems very attractive, but may not be true to the source. I'd really like to hear the original files.

Brad
__________________
plotagainstrachel.bandcamp.com

Little Red Wagon Studios
How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW:
http://youtu.be/bswx5zrFRl0
http://youtu.be/W-II32AvVd8
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #19
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad McGowan View Post
I was totally joking. For the record I'm a big proponent of Evidence Audio cables, which eats Mogami for breakfast and lunch.

Can you please post the raw files so that we have a reference? To me the ideal cable is invisible to the audio. A lesser cable will act as a filter and add distortion.

There is definitely an audible difference between the files, and I'm only listening on crappy $5 headphones. I hear a more neutral frequency response on B. There seems to be better separation between instruments and a more detailed sound. The midrange on A seems to more of a hyped feeling which at first seems very attractive, but may not be true to the source. I'd really like to hear the original files.

Brad
For sure. I'll post the originals.

I really wish I had an Evidence Audio snake to test! Do you have a Dsub snake?
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #20
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Originals

Attached Files
File Type: wav Pink Floyd - Original.wav (4.89 MB, 115 views)
File Type: wav Miles Davis - Original.wav (5.63 MB, 80 views)
File Type: wav Coldplay - Original.wav (4.97 MB, 84 views)
File Type: wav Ken Andrews - Original.wav (5.00 MB, 55 views)
File Type: wav PaloAlto - Original.wav (4.90 MB, 56 views)
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #21
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582

Quote:
Originally Posted by norman_nomad View Post
For sure. I'll post the originals.

I really wish I had an Evidence Audio snake to test! Do you have a Dsub snake?
No there's no such thing...yet.

You know, I just listened to the original to compare with the processed clips. I have no clue what's what or which cable is truer to the source. But what I can tell you is that I don't like the sound of either of those cables (coupled with your converters/clock) compared to the original file. Both A and B sound veiled and dynamically restricted to my ears. It could be lousy power causing those effects for all we know. There's so many variables that can affect the performance of a simple thing like playing audio through some cables.

If I can find the time before you reveal the results I should process a couple files at my place, where I'm using Mytek conversion and Mogami cables as well as balanced power and a Richard Gray's Power Company 400 on the AC circuit.

Brad
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th October 2008   #22
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad McGowan View Post

If I can find the time before you reveal the results I should process a couple files at my place, where I'm using Mytek conversion and Mogami cables as well as balanced power and a Richard Gray's Power Company 400 on the AC circuit.

Brad
That'd be sweet! Post them here if you can.
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008   #23
Lives for gear
 
shangoe's Avatar
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Location: berlin
Posts: 542

A - closer to the source
shangoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008   #24
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582

I'm a big ******. I processed the files tonight at the studio but forgot to copy them back onto the flash drive to bring them home. Doh! Thursday. I think they are going to sound different than the versions you posted...in a more transparent way.

Brad
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008   #25
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad McGowan View Post
I'm a big ******. I processed the files tonight at the studio but forgot to copy them back onto the flash drive to bring them home. Doh! Thursday. I think they are going to sound different than the versions you posted...in a more transparent way.

Brad
Cool. Technically we should really randomize the file names so that people aren't thrown by the power of suggestion... but maybe that's a bit too much for just this one thread.

Were the converters setup for perfect unity gain? Very curious to hear them.
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 28th October 2008   #26
Lives for gear
 
Brad McGowan's Avatar
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582

I didn't do a formal check of the gains but when I flipped back and forth between the original and processed I couldn't hear a difference in volume. Technically the the Mytek is set internally with the fixed gain setting on both input and output (0VU = -15dBFS).

Brad
Brad McGowan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2008   #27
Lives for gear
 
DONNX's Avatar
 
Joined: Sep 2008
Location: United States
Posts: 5,351

B sounded louder.
DONNX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5th November 2008   #28
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
The poll results are interesting... most people posting seem to prefer A... but the poll shows a preference for B. Anyone who prefers B care to elaborate why?
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2008   #29
Lives for gear
 
norman_nomad's Avatar
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711

Thread Starter
Whoops! Forgot to update this with an answer:

A = Belden
B = Mogami




As of this moment the polls are split totally evenly, which I think is telling.
Attached Thumbnails
Mogami vs Belden - Critical Listening Test, Clean Out Your Ears!-poll-results.jpg  
norman_nomad is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 26th November 2008   #30
Gear interested
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7

Its all about Kanari cables. Thats what id use all they way!!!! even if u have to build them urself!!! Just my 2cents
Fusion is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mogami vs. Belden ToddS High end 55 5th September 2010 12:03 PM
Critical listening..... Bruce Swedien High end 0 17th October 2008 07:48 PM
Is Belden brighter than Mogami doug_hti So much gear, so little time! 0 14th October 2005 09:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:37 PM.

Home - Search Forum - Contact Us - Terms Of Use - Advertise on Gearslutz - All Advertisers - Archive - Top
 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com LTD - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office - 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.
Hosted by Nimbus Hosting.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.