![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| View Poll Results: Which cable do you prefer | |||
| I prefer A | | 27 | 36.00% |
| I prefer B | | 20 | 26.67% |
| I hear no difference | | 28 | 37.33% |
| Voters: 75. You may not vote on this poll | |||
New Reply | Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | Mogami vs Belden - Critical Listening Test, Clean Out Your Ears!
Is there a sonic difference between cable brands/types? What about with line cables and snakes? This simple A/B test intends to compare the sonic differences between two different standard cable brands. The two contenders: 1. Belden/CBI 2BF 20ft Dsub Snake 2. Mogami 3162 110ohm 20ft Digital/Audio Cable The Mogami cable is a dual purpose digital/audio cable and is supposed to perform better than standard cable due to the tighter impedance tolerances. Like most of my test you'll get multiple files labeled "A" and "B". The cable type will be consistent between files meaning... If the Mogami is "A" it will be "A" for ALL files. Likewise, if the Mogami is "B" it will be "B" for ALL files. Test was done using a Lynx Aurora 16, 44.1khz on Internal Clock. This is a critical listening test. The differences, if any, will likely not be drastic. I recommend focusing on just one part of the performance... a guitar, or bell, or piano, or cymbal splash .. to extract the subtleties. So do you hear a difference? Which do you prefer, A or B? Why? |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #4 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,978
| WOW, here, the: A sounds brighter, "complete" B sounds like old radio. "incomplete/missing harmonics/hold back" what software are you usign ? this cable test is for AES/EBU test? or audio test? |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | Quote:
This is an AUDIO test. The mogami are AES/EBU cables that I'm using for audio.... they're supposed to be better because of less impedance... The Belden's are just standard audio cable. Thanks for sharing your opinion! | |
| | |
| | #6 | |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,978
| Quote:
how do you connect the aurora to your pc? what sound card did you used ? what brand model of cables are used for AES/EBU ? are you usign ADAT? and you have the lt-adat card inside aurora. Thanks | |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear addict Joined: Nov 2004 Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 321
|
I liked B the most, based mostly on the Coldplay track. The sound was maybe a touch less detailed, but a bit warmer and more relaxing to listen to. I'm guessing this is the standard Belden cable?
|
| | |
| | #9 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 756
|
Do not get it! are you comparing Digital audio cables and analog cables??????????????????? Please, can you explain this?? |
| | |
| | #10 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | Quote:
BOTH cables are being used for AUDIO. The mogami is a digital cable that I'm using for AUDIO. Many people claim that digital cable is better for audio because of the tighter impedance tolerance which is supposed to be better for high frequencies. | |
| | |
| | #11 |
| 3 + infractions, forum membership suspended. Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,978
|
can you use the original wave file ? Rosetta 200 Vs Aurora 16 Shout Out The "test" Rosetta 200 Vs Aurora 16 Shout Out The "test" to know how different are two diferent auroras ? it seems thers big diferences from unit to unit in other brands with same models. Thanks |
| | |
| | #12 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | Quote:
One thing I'll say is that his wav files all did something weird... they were drifting out of phase from the original and I suspect he either had some strange clock settings going on or sample capture settings or something... My file is sample for sample locked to the original. | |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2008 Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 861
|
A sounds more open and hi fi, and B comes off a bit warmer. I would go for A with most sources.
|
| | |
| | #14 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Nov 2004 Location: Europe...
Posts: 565
|
"A" better for me.much open ,larger.....
|
| | |
| | #15 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582
|
Wait, I thought all cables sounded the same... Just kidding.Brad |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2008 Location: Sweden
Posts: 3,960
|
And you all listen blind and score 10/10? ![]() /Peter |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | |
| | |
| | #18 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582
|
I was totally joking. For the record I'm a big proponent of Evidence Audio cables, which eats Mogami for breakfast and lunch. Can you please post the raw files so that we have a reference? To me the ideal cable is invisible to the audio. A lesser cable will act as a filter and add distortion. There is definitely an audible difference between the files, and I'm only listening on crappy $5 headphones. I hear a more neutral frequency response on B. There seems to be better separation between instruments and a more detailed sound. The midrange on A seems to more of a hyped feeling which at first seems very attractive, but may not be true to the source. I'd really like to hear the original files. Brad
__________________ plotagainstrachel.bandcamp.com Little Red Wagon Studios How to integrate your analog tape deck with your DAW: http://youtu.be/bswx5zrFRl0 http://youtu.be/W-II32AvVd8 |
| | |
| | #19 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | Quote:
I really wish I had an Evidence Audio snake to test! Do you have a Dsub snake? | |
| | |
| | #20 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | Originals |
| | |
| | #21 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582
| Quote:
You know, I just listened to the original to compare with the processed clips. I have no clue what's what or which cable is truer to the source. But what I can tell you is that I don't like the sound of either of those cables (coupled with your converters/clock) compared to the original file. Both A and B sound veiled and dynamically restricted to my ears. It could be lousy power causing those effects for all we know. There's so many variables that can affect the performance of a simple thing like playing audio through some cables. If I can find the time before you reveal the results I should process a couple files at my place, where I'm using Mytek conversion and Mogami cables as well as balanced power and a Richard Gray's Power Company 400 on the AC circuit. Brad | |
| | |
| | #22 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #23 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Dec 2003 Location: berlin
Posts: 542
|
A - closer to the source
|
| | |
| | #24 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582
|
I'm a big ******. I processed the files tonight at the studio but forgot to copy them back onto the flash drive to bring them home. Doh! Thursday. I think they are going to sound different than the versions you posted...in a more transparent way. Brad |
| | |
| | #25 | |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter | Quote:
Were the converters setup for perfect unity gain? Very curious to hear them. | |
| | |
| | #26 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Jan 2003 Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 5,582
|
I didn't do a formal check of the gains but when I flipped back and forth between the original and processed I couldn't hear a difference in volume. Technically the the Mytek is set internally with the fixed gain setting on both input and output (0VU = -15dBFS). Brad |
| | |
| | #27 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Sep 2008 Location: United States
Posts: 5,351
|
B sounded louder.
|
| | |
| | #28 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter |
The poll results are interesting... most people posting seem to prefer A... but the poll shows a preference for B. Anyone who prefers B care to elaborate why?
|
| | |
| | #29 |
| Lives for gear Joined: Mar 2004 Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,711
Thread Starter |
Whoops! Forgot to update this with an answer: A = Belden B = Mogami ![]() As of this moment the polls are split totally evenly, which I think is telling. |
| | |
| | #30 |
| Gear interested Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 7
|
Its all about Kanari cables. Thats what id use all they way!!!! even if u have to build them urself!!! Just my 2cents
|
| | |
New Reply
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Mogami vs. Belden | ToddS | High end | 55 | 5th September 2010 12:03 PM |
| Critical listening..... | Bruce Swedien | High end | 0 | 17th October 2008 07:48 PM |
| Is Belden brighter than Mogami | doug_hti | So much gear, so little time! | 0 | 14th October 2005 09:38 AM |
| |