Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Audio file upload / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear shoot outs / Sound file comparisons / Audio tests

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 18th March 2008, 10:29 AM   #1
JamesTinney
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 70
Fatso

I know this isn't a new piece of kit, but i always find these types of comparison's useful! This example is not pushing the fatso hard & slightly undoing the Warmth Effect by adding high EQ afterwards but hey I like it! (Samples are adjusted for volume differences)


For this example:
----
Out from Cubase, via Mytek ADDA

Via SSL Logic FX 383 mic-pre

Filter on around 20 (Split in)
Impediance button out

INSERT - Fatso

Warm 2
Bus Compressor
Tranny - out
Input 3.5
Output 5.5


Back into:
SSL Logic FX 383 EQ

Green
up 0.6 (re the dials) at 7 with x3 on,
Q at 0.5 (far right)

Pink
Up 0.5 (re the dials) at 10

---------------------------------------
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 Before Fatso.mp3 (629.6 KB, 825 views)
File Type: mp3 After Fatso.mp3 (705.1 KB, 774 views)
__________________
www.thebarchord.com - music for media
JamesTinney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th March 2008, 11:32 PM   #2
Bump Music
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 608
I got a Fatso as well. Love it more every day. I really like what it did to your track. But if the Fatso had a threshold control for that buss comp AND a saturation control you could do some SERIOUS damage (in a good way).
Bump Music is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2008, 02:21 AM   #3
Mitch Deason
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 38
thanks for posting this
Mitch Deason is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2008, 06:20 AM   #4
u b k
Lives for gear
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: m a n h a t t a n
Posts: 4,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bump Music View Post
But if the Fatso had a threshold control for that buss comp AND a saturation control you could do some SERIOUS damage (in a good way).

stick a simple gain controller, like an atty, on the insert. slam the input as hard as you want for the saturation, then use the inserted gain control to hit the comp as needed.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________
.
.
m i x _ a r c h i t e c t
.
.
__________________
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2008, 10:44 AM   #5
lostinmusic
Gear nut
 
lostinmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 118
I use the FATSO on pretty much everything but IMO it has two distinct uses. On the master buss it's great for a subtle rounding off of edges - Tranny on and a bit of warmth (basically a de-esser). I'm not a huge fan of the compressor section - maybe used it two or three times.

For tracking though, it's a completely different beast. Try routing your drums through it (compression off again) and cranking up the input to around 9. Sounds far, far better to me than any plugin limiter. I'll be checking out the Anamod as soon as I can but this second use of the FATSO is the closest emulation of what tape does that I've heard so far (ok, different - sometimes worse, sometimes better).

The compressor section isn't actually all that bad - sounds kind of expensive really but seems to push things back in the mix too much for my taste.
lostinmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2008, 02:08 PM   #6
Yetti
Lives for gear
 
Yetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 740
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesTinney View Post
I know this isn't a new piece of kit, but i always find these types of comparison's useful! This example is not pushing the fatso hard & slightly undoing the Warmth Effect by adding high EQ afterwards but hey I like it! (Samples are adjusted for volume differences)


For this example:
----
Out from Cubase, via Mytek ADDA

Via SSL Logic FX 383 mic-pre

Filter on around 20 (Split in)
Impediance button out

INSERT - Fatso

Warm 2
Bus Compressor
Tranny - out
Input 3.5
Output 5.5


Back into:
SSL Logic FX 383 EQ

Green
up 0.6 (re the dials) at 7 with x3 on,
Q at 0.5 (far right)

Pink
Up 0.5 (re the dials) at 10

---------------------------------------
Yes the Fatso track sounds better, but more than that I think that track is killer!
I would like to hear more of that!
Great job!
__________________

Yetti-
Yetti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd March 2008, 11:40 PM   #7
Zuewi
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austria
Posts: 241
Thanks for the stuff. Yeah the fatso clip sounds more like a record.
Btw. what is that instrument what starts at 00:13 and sounds like a singing voice? a moog?
Zuewi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2008, 03:05 AM   #8
u b k
Lives for gear
 
u b k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: m a n h a t t a n
Posts: 4,768
Quote:
Originally Posted by lostinmusic View Post
The compressor section isn't actually all that bad - sounds kind of expensive really but seems to push things back in the mix too much for my taste.

that's it's strength, imo, but it's only helpful if you need something pushed back.

it absolutely KILLS in parallel, though, just bring back a little of the transient and you have hugeness only a few other comps can rival.


gregoire
del
ubk
.
__________________
.
.
m i x _ a r c h i t e c t
.
.
__________________
u b k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd March 2008, 01:21 PM   #9
lostinmusic
Gear nut
 
lostinmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by u b k View Post
it absolutely KILLS in parallel, though, just bring back a little of the transient and you have hugeness only a few other comps can rival.
Interesting - I'll try that..
lostinmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 24th March 2008, 08:49 PM   #10
undermind
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 432
Yes, the Fatso track definitely sounds better. I thought perhaps it was the old volume thing where the louder one will always sound better, but this is not the case. They seem to be volume matched. There is better separation and the instruments all just sound bigger. Like mentioned previously, it sounds more like a record.

Makes me wonder about all the people that say they don't like it across the mix. I think they may not be using it subtly enough like this was. It is probably used too much as an effect rather than an enhancement.
undermind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2008, 04:05 AM   #11
lucasmusic
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 194
wow, its like adding warm butter to popcorn...really polishes up the mix nicely! Great test!
lucasmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2008, 10:17 AM   #12
Roman
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 34
The Fasto processed audio is bassier

It is not subtle IMO. Why hasn't anyone mentioned this?
And louder.
Roman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 26th March 2008, 10:35 AM   #13
Schaap
Gear nut
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 143
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuewi View Post
Thanks for the stuff. Yeah the fatso clip sounds more like a record.
+1. Without the Fatso it sounds like a mix, with as a record.

Henk
__________________
"Good music has feeling"
www.youtube.com/watch?v=BYLU1HsgGrg
Schaap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th March 2008, 07:39 PM   #14
d1rtynyc
Gear addict
 
d1rtynyc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Brooklyn
Posts: 336
WOW!
Thanks for the post.
Kinda subtle, but definitely glues it together nice!

I like the track as well. (what was there at least)
d1rtynyc is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 27th March 2008, 10:13 PM   #15
undermind
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 432
I can't wait to hear some opinions on the Fatso UAD plugin when that comes out. I might have to get some UAD cards, getting too tempting!
undermind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30th March 2008, 11:24 AM   #16
JamesTinney
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 70
great discussion going on here, the parallel compression idea, nice

Yeah, I agree with Roman the Fatso does bring the bass end out, so much so that on mixes if I use the tranny aswell I feel the bass end becomes too much. Has anyone on thoughts on this?

Zuewi - the instrument that comes in is a theramin emulation (Super
Spooky Keys VSTi - it's a freebe VSTi & a lot of fun to play with)

Lostinmusic - In what do you feel it pushes the track back in the mix, be great if you could shed further light! Thinking off the top of my head, is it the way a compressor deals with the high frequency transients? Great to have ur thoughts,

Cheers

James
__________________
www.thebarchord.com - music for media
JamesTinney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31st March 2008, 06:45 PM   #17
lostinmusic
Gear nut
 
lostinmusic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: London
Posts: 118
Quote:
Originally Posted by JamesTinney View Post
Lostinmusic - In what do you feel it pushes the track back in the mix, be great if you could shed further light! Thinking off the top of my head, is it the way a compressor deals with the high frequency transients? Great to have ur thoughts,
Oops, I've done it now :-) to my ears, the compressor section doesn't have any bite which is probably exactly what they had in mind. Perhaps it's a lack of distortion, I don't know really but the effect, at least to my ears, is one of pushing the sound 'back' in the mix (which as ubk rightly pointed out makes it the perfect compressor for when that effect is required..!). You know, having said this now, I'll probably end up using it all the time
lostinmusic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 07:41 AM   #18
bcgood
Lives for gear
 
bcgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,179
plus...

plus...
Attached Files
File Type: mp3 After Fatso plus.mp3 (707.6 KB, 155 views)
__________________
bcgood

bcgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 07:59 AM   #19
undermind
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Puget Sound, WA
Posts: 432
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcgood View Post
plus...
What's this??
undermind is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 04:52 PM   #20
JamesTinney
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 70
wow!! that's awesome, it now sounds soooo smooth!!

Very excited about what you've done to it!!

You must tell me!! What processes have you done on it & with what gear? I'm all ears!!
__________________
www.thebarchord.com - music for media
JamesTinney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th April 2008, 06:23 PM   #21
bcgood
Lives for gear
 
bcgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: West Coast
Posts: 2,179
Hi James, I'm glad you liked it. I used around 7 different subtle processes on your track that all add up in the end. I slightly expanded the stereo image and also bounced it to tape. I then adjusted some parameters that are honestly at this stage something of a black art. I'm currently working with a well known mastering engineer to refine and then patent some of the processes; so needles to say I'm not going to talk about some of the specific processes in detail right now...
__________________
bcgood

bcgood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th April 2008, 05:14 AM   #22
Crandak
Gear nut
 
Crandak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 130
I must have really fried my hearing at some point. I can't hear any difference at all on all 3 versions through my bm6's... oh well... It's a good thing my forte is song writing rather than engineering.
Crandak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th April 2008, 10:48 AM   #23
Zuewi
Gear maniac
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Austria
Posts: 241
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcgood View Post
Hi James, I'm glad you liked it. I used around 7 different subtle processes on your track that all add up in the end. I slightly expanded the stereo image and also bounced it to tape. I then adjusted some parameters that are honestly at this stage something of a black art. I'm currently working with a well known mastering engineer to refine and then patent some of the processes; so needles to say I'm not going to talk about some of the specific processes in detail right now...
Well the last file sounds best i mean, but i doesn't think that it was that far away from the second file.
There is a big improvement from the first to the second.
Zuewi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 27th April 2008, 07:24 AM   #24
JamesTinney
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 70
Roman - Regarding the bass becoming louder, that's probably the tape emulation element of the fatso kicking in,

j
__________________
www.thebarchord.com - music for media
JamesTinney is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2008, 07:23 PM   #25
mdjice
Gear maniac
 
mdjice's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston/Paris
Posts: 254
I was considering it but in the 2 samples, it s doesn't like a huge improvement. It sounds like something that could have been done simply with a eq. yes the fatso track sounds better but it;s not like the fatso is bringing something exceptional. A bit brighter to me that;s all. I don't think I will get one now. maybe 2 distressor.
thanks for the test
__________________
Multi Platinum...because it's better then gold;)
www.mickaelmusic.com
http://www.openlabs.com/mickael.html
mdjice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd May 2008, 07:42 PM   #26
AMIEL
Lives for gear
 
AMIEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 2,201
Send a message via AIM to AMIEL Send a message via MSN to AMIEL Send a message via Yahoo to AMIEL
I prefer the AFTER FATSO better!
Now, the after Fatso sounds brighter,,,,so please can you guys elaborate about this...because i constantly hear that the Fatso cut off some harsh top end...or the Fatso can also make a source.. sounds brighter?
__________________
Peace.

Reuven Amiel.

"Get your Focal Monitors!"


Send me a PM.

"There are no rules, just knowledge, good taste and experimentation"

"Music was designed to escape from reality for a moment, not to magnify our fears and problems"
AMIEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2008, 12:34 AM   #27
mdjice
Gear maniac
 
mdjice's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston/Paris
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by AMIEL View Post
I prefer the AFTER FATSO better!
Now, the after Fatso sounds brighter,,,,so please can you guys elaborate about this...because i constantly hear that the Fatso cut off some harsh top end...or the Fatso can also make a source.. sounds brighter?
good point...
__________________
Multi Platinum...because it's better then gold;)
www.mickaelmusic.com
http://www.openlabs.com/mickael.html
mdjice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd May 2008, 10:50 AM   #28
khai
Gear nut
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 88
I've got a Fatso. Because of the compression and saturation involved some frequencies can be enhanced. But if you're listening with attention, they're not the very high and harsh ones. Also the "warm" in the fatso works like a harsh frequency limiter so it depends on the dynamic of these very high frequencies.
khai is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2008, 03:02 AM   #29
mdjice
Gear maniac
 
mdjice's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Houston/Paris
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by khai View Post
I've got a Fatso. Because of the compression and saturation involved some frequencies can be enhanced. But if you're listening with attention, they're not the very high and harsh ones. Also the "warm" in the fatso works like a harsh frequency limiter so it depends on the dynamic of these very high frequencies.
So to you it's a good buy? if today I would give you your money back, would you get the fatso again or would you get something else?
do you use it in the mix? where?
thx
__________________
Multi Platinum...because it's better then gold;)
www.mickaelmusic.com
http://www.openlabs.com/mickael.html
mdjice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th May 2008, 05:09 AM   #30
AMIEL
Lives for gear
 
AMIEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 2,201
Send a message via AIM to AMIEL Send a message via MSN to AMIEL Send a message via Yahoo to AMIEL
Quote:
Originally Posted by khai View Post
I've got a Fatso. Because of the compression and saturation involved some frequencies can be enhanced. But if you're listening with attention, they're not the very high and harsh ones. Also the "warm" in the fatso works like a harsh frequency limiter so it depends on the dynamic of these very high frequencies.
Actually the very high frequencies are not the very harsh...
and anyway ..would be more noticeble the 'Warmth" effect in the Fatso....I feel puch, vibe and prescense in the After Fatso clip...but ....

What I want to know what and how using the Fatso makes the source sound brighte, like in this "after Fatso" example.
__________________
Peace.

Reuven Amiel.

"Get your Focal Monitors!"


Send me a PM.

"There are no rules, just knowledge, good taste and experimentation"

"Music was designed to escape from reality for a moment, not to magnify our fears and problems"
AMIEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Do I need a Fatso????? Ace'Lo High end 24 24th April 2007 02:15 PM
What does Fatso Jr. do? Distressor vs. Fatso Jr.? azzzy So much gear, so little time! 2 22nd April 2007 06:59 PM
Fatso or ...? janek 68 High end 22 23rd March 2007 04:55 PM
Fatso basement High end 14 19th January 2004 06:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0