![]() | All Advertisers |
| | #61 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| Sorry for making you wait people. BTW I'm done testing, tonight I've finally completed the mixbuss tests and matched all the levels. It took me a lot for two reasons, first the ATB doesn't have center detent pots on line inputs, hence more work to be sure the actual respective levels on the both consoles were the same, plus matching the peaks didn't give me the same subjective (and RMS) volumes and I had to reimport all the samples into another project and match them by phase reversing. BTW, at the end of the day I realized I had run out of CD's... (tooooooo BAAAAAD). Tomorrow you're gonna have the results guys, just wait for some hours, we're almost done ![]() |
| | |
| | #62 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
__________________ Nathan Eldred www.AtlasProAudio.com Boutique Gear Consultation & Sales NEW!! Pro Audio Rentals ![]() www.AtlasRecording.com Recording/Mixing/Mastering Services | |
| | |
| | #63 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: London, England
Posts: 15
| Well done, Ciozzi Whatever the result, this has been a lot of precise testing and Ciozzi deserves all our thanks. Having designed the original 80 circuitry in the 70s and used the same in our 8T I am no doubt interested in what you guys prefer. We were compared at the TEC Awards in the US so the result here is important. I do have an upscaled version of our product on our drawing board to fit between the entry level price of the 8T and our more expensive consoles. May the best board win! JOHN ORAM TRIDENT AUDIO LTD., WINNER OF 2007 TEC AWARD, SMALL FORMAT CONSOLE DESIGN WINNER OF PAR EXCELLENCE AWARD 2007 for TRIDENT 8T-8 |
| | |
| | #64 |
| Gear addict | 24 hrs passed... :) I'm impatient! |
| | |
| | #65 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| As I promised, here is the mixbuss test. As you can see besides clipping the buss I've added a couple a samples limited with the PL2 (that is the best limiter I've ever tried so far). The samples are meant to be: 1: normal gain staging 2: few db of clipping (1-2) 3: audible distortion but still consistent sound 4: deliberate distorion PL2: sample 1 limited to imitate the deliberate distortion of sample 4 Driving the output on the consoles I tried to match the audible "distortion" on the respective files but as you can see from the PL2 samples, actual limiting was different! A little note: Clipping level on console A was +19 dBu, on console B more than +26 dBu. I'm not shure but it should be around 28-30 dBu cause even the rosetta 800 with the soft limit engaged went into RED (from that point to go I had to use the phone output to record the "hotter" samples) |
| | |
| | #66 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| and console B... |
| | |
| | #67 |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: maui, hawaii
Posts: 343
| good job Ciozzi, listening to mp3,s on computer and headphones right now, so its hard for me to tell a difference. thanks for your efforts. aloha
__________________ Tom Lelli ____________________________________ ![]() "you are what you do, not what you say you do" |
| | |
| | #68 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| Quote:
While B is smoother, round with more umpf, A is cleaner with more HF detail. Anyway if you are interested,I'll post a zip file soon with all the wav files. | |
| | |
| | #69 | |
| Gear addict Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: maui, hawaii
Posts: 343
| Quote:
they both sound pretty good, all comes down to personal preference. again great job aloha
__________________ Tom Lelli ____________________________________ ![]() "you are what you do, not what you say you do" | |
| | |
| | #70 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| Listen to these last files and let me know when you want the results ![]() ENJOY! |
| | |
| | #71 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Chicago
Posts: 38
| Yeah.. getting tough to pick differences, now. As the gain went up, I thought maybe I was hearing A retain a hair more in the upper mids. Judging just from these samples, it seems clear that one could do good stuff with either board. |
| | |
| | #72 | |
| Lives for gear | Quote:
That sounds like it would be nice John.
__________________ Nathan Eldred www.AtlasProAudio.com Boutique Gear Consultation & Sales NEW!! Pro Audio Rentals ![]() www.AtlasRecording.com Recording/Mixing/Mastering Services | |
| | |
| | #73 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: London
Posts: 118
| I'm considering one of these desks as it happens. Could you post the original audio file? B sounds bassier, maybe punchier and A sounds more focussed by comparison but without the original audio I don't know which is telling the truth. Thanks Neil. |
| | |
| | #74 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Minnesota
Posts: 42
| I like the Guitars on B better..they seem to be a little more full and low end. The snares sound almost the same to me.. Could not decide between what one is better to my taste. The vocals in A tended to sound a little better where B sounded a little more midrange. Overall I would go with console B. |
| | |
| | #75 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| I was listening to the mixbuss mp3's earlier and I realized that all the subtleties I could hear on the wav's were gone. I've uploaded a zip file of this test with all the original wave files at this link: ciozzi.altervista.org/mixbuss test.rar Copy the adress and paste it! I'll provide all the other wave samples as well, just give me some time to find a free web space and upload them. |
| | |
| | #76 |
| Gear addict | I have heaphones only (hd280) at the moment, but when I listen to the distorted ones I much prefer B. |
| | |
| | #77 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| Download the zip file with the wave's. There's much more noticeable difference to me in the original samples, especially in the low end that the mp3's just cut out! |
| | |
| | #78 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 161
| Love console B. A seems a step down in excitement and emotion.
__________________ Larry Hammel Vocalist/Producer/CEO Deepwave Music Productions http://www.deepwavemusic.com Long Island City/NYC |
| | |
| | #79 |
| Gear addict | let's find out now! :) |
| | |
| | #80 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Aug 2007 Location: Chicago
Posts: 38
| Quote:
All this this seems consistent with comments about the individual tracks. | |
| | |
| | #81 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,203
| we want to know! we want to know! btw.. I like B. |
| | |
| | #82 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| |
| | |
| | #83 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 161
| I like B's mix buss and A's eq. Thanks for the results. I have an ATB. The ATB sounds great, the Trident seems to have that little something extra in the mix.
__________________ Larry Hammel Vocalist/Producer/CEO Deepwave Music Productions http://www.deepwavemusic.com Long Island City/NYC |
| | |
| | #84 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| Quote:
The ATB uses last generation Burr Brown op amps, with extended frequency response and a lot of detail in the very high end. The 8T uses TL0 series chips that sound "warmer" cause of their limited response at the top end. Which one is better ? Well... as usual.. it depends... I have got a preference myself, but I'm not gonna say it for now. I don't want anyone to think that I favoured one console over the other, cause that would completely wrong, I did my best to be as objective as possible. Now it's your turn again people... let me know what you think | |
| | |
| | #85 | |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 844
| Quote:
Aside from the sound (the results are out and comparisons can still be made); Which of the two desks has a better build quality, like pots, faders, jacks, chassis, and overall finish? My understanding so far is that the Toft is made in China, whilst the Trident is made in England. But which has the better build, and would give the user full confidence in using the desk for long sessions, etc? | |
| | |
| | #86 | |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| Quote:
Even if the construction quality of the ATB is better I feel myself working more confortably with the 8T cause of its layout. The Eq's are placed right over the master fader and easly accessible without getting off the chair. I have to mention that I don't use the AUX sends so much, and what I said could be the opposite for someone who uses them a lot. | |
| | |
| | #87 |
| Gear addict | thank God, because I prefer 8T because of the look and layout - and it sounds better to my ears too :) |
| | |
| | #88 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 660
| Thank you for your awesome work and time in this comparison!! |
| | |
| | #89 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: C-ville area VA
Posts: 1,203
| Thanks for doing this. What I found interesting about the mix buss test was that when driven, B's kick drum was more present sounding...not just bigger. |
| | |
| | #90 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 273
| What do you think about the way the PL2 limits compared to the consoles ? To my ears sounds smoother but too soft for some duties. I have to admit it's been the first time I clipped the master buss on these consoles and I was not expecting such good results! |
| | |