Gearslutz.com

All Advertisers
Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Audio file upload / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests


New Reply New Reply Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old 16th February 2008   #31
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fano
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to Ciozzi
Quote:
Originally Posted by dasoundjunkie View Post
First of all thanx for the tests! Now I'd really like to know which is which?
I'll say which is which... but not yet! If I have time tomorrow I'll perform some quick summing tests.

Hope you're enjoying this shootout
Ciozzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2008   #32
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fano
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to Ciozzi
Currently performing some tests on the mix buss. I'll post the results later...
Ciozzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2008   #33
Lives for gear
 
dasoundjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,092

Ok ! By the way , I had the Toft ec-1 channel strip in here a couple of days ago and really liked the eq on it. The compressor was very good but took some getting used to since it was nowhere near as aggressive as my 1176 ( the only FET compressor I have). It was much smoother , really good for making something sit in a mix transparently without calling a lot of attention to itself. I didn't get a chance to try the mic-pre (only had it for an hour). I'm definitely getting 2 of the EQs! (you can get 4 channels for under grand!!!) great stuff for little money.
dasoundjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th February 2008   #34
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fano
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to Ciozzi
Work in progress, today I've tested the mix buss on the console A. I recorded six samples at different volumes, from low peak levels all the way up until squashing the buss.

In the end I took the console back to normal gain settings and used a Pendulum PL2 (brick wall peak limiter) to squash the buss by the same amount previously achived by gain staging.

Console B is now waiting to be tested

Guys, this is really fun! I think it's really worth it (at least for me) even if takes a shit load of time
Ciozzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2008   #35
Lives for gear
 
NathanEldred's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: West Coast Central Florida
Posts: 7,130

Send a message via AIM to NathanEldred
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciozzi View Post
Work in progress, today I've tested the mix buss on the console A. I recorded six samples at different volumes, from low peak levels all the way up until squashing the buss.

In the end I took the console back to normal gain settings and used a Pendulum PL2 (brick wall peak limiter) to squash the buss by the same amount previously achived by gain staging.

Console B is now waiting to be tested

Guys, this is really fun! I think it's really worth it (at least for me) even if takes a shit load of time
Thanks for doing that, looking forward to the results.thumbsup
NathanEldred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 17th February 2008   #36
Lives for gear
 
ricfoxx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Jacksonville, Fl
Posts: 514

The 8T... I know

I had it and it sounds like Console A of the first tests. In the Eq tests its harder for me to differentiate but it seems the different consoles effects the Frequencies around the cut/boost the most. Console B was fatter but also muddier and Console A was cleaner and a little thinner but had an interesting vibe to it. I would use Console A's pres for some Vox and Acoustic Guitars maybe Overheads and B for everything else. Cool test. Very different sounding Pres.
__________________
Roc n SoL Studios
www.rocnsolstudios.com
www.myspace.com/rocinsol
ricfoxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #37
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fano
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to Ciozzi
I've got a problem...

How can I tame the outputs of the console without affecting the signal ? Pushing the buss the console makes the input stage of the PL2 clip

Any ideas ?
Ciozzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #38
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,320

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciozzi View Post
I've got a problem...

How can I tame the outputs of the console without affecting the signal ? Pushing the buss the console makes the input stage of the PL2 clip

Any ideas ?
Humm..You would think the Pendulum would be able to handle the outputs of these consoles. They must have VERY hot outputs or maybe sumpin's wrong with the Pendulum?....
__________________
Thanks for your time and ears!
Snatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #39
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fano
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to Ciozzi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snatchman View Post
Humm..You would think the Pendulum would be able to handle the outputs of these consoles. They must have VERY hot outputs or maybe sumpin's wrong with the Pendulum?....
The PL2 has three knobs... it's very difficult to get mixed up...

Input gain was at 0 dB, output counterclockwise (to prevent the AD stage from clipping) and ceiling at +22.

At a certain point the limiting starts to take place (the signal clips over +22 probably, and obviously the test from here to go, is not fair anymore). Driving the outputs even further I see the gain reduction on the pendulum reaching 4 dBs and at this point if I keep raising the volume on the console I hear horrible clicks and noises.

To determine what was clipping I brought the master output down on the console so the limiter on the PL2 was not working and increased the input gain on the same unit with the ceiling set at +22 dB. Same thing again (but this time the console is at normal gain staging), the limiting starts, the gain reduction reaches 4 dB and from there to go horrible clicks and noises again.

Am I missing something or the PL2 is clipping ?
Ciozzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #40
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,320

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciozzi View Post
The PL2 has three knobs... it's very difficult to get mixed up...

Input gain was at 0 dB, output counterclockwise (to prevent the AD stage from clipping) and ceiling at +22.

At a certain point the limiting starts to take place (the signal clips over +22 probably, and obviously the test from here to go, is not fair anymore). Driving the outputs even further I see the gain reduction on the pendulum reaching 4 dBs and at this point if I keep raising the volume on the console I hear horrible clicks and noises.

To determine what was clipping I brought the master output down on the console so the limiter on the PL2 was not working and increased the input gain on the same unit with the ceiling set at +22 dB. Same thing again (but this time the console is at normal gain staging), the limiting starts, the gain reduction reaches 4 dB and from there to go horrible clicks and noises again.

Am I missing something or the PL2 is clipping ?
Do the Pendulum have a +4 / -10 switch on it? ( maybe it's set to -10?).. I could be wrong ( definately have been before.....) but I would think the Pendulum would accept a line-level signal at unity gain without clipping. Hence the reason I say maybe somethings wrong with it? I mean my Behringer Master-Com 2 Buss Compressor...tutt.. will accept the +29 output from my Tascam M-2600mkII console at unity without clipping the inputs. What are you levels coming into your channels input of these two consoles?
Snatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #41
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fano
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to Ciozzi
Quote:
Originally Posted by Snatchman View Post
Do the Pendulum have a +4 / -10 switch on it? ( maybe it's set to -10?).. I could be wrong ( definately have been before.....) but I would think the Pendulum would accept a line-level signal at unity gain without clipping. Hence the reason I say maybe somethings wrong with it? I mean my Behringer Master-Com 2 Buss Compressor...tutt.. will accept the +29 output from my Tascam M-2600mkII console at unity without clipping the inputs. What are you levels coming into your channels input of these two consoles?
No swtiches on it... check it out yourself: Pendulum PL-2 JFET/MOSFET Analog Peak Limiter , and the manual says that the maximum output level is 27 dBu.

I was thinking about connecting the console with an unbalanced cable (-6dB) but it could be not enough...

If there's someone that still wants to listen to the mix buss samples, his help would be really appreciated
Ciozzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18th February 2008   #42
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 3,320

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciozzi View Post
No swtiches on it... check it out yourself: Pendulum PL-2 JFET/MOSFET Analog Peak Limiter , and the manual says that the maximum output level is 27 dBu.

I was thinking about connecting the console with an unbalanced cable (-6dB) but it could be not enough...

If there's someone that still wants to listen to the mix buss samples, his help would be really appreciated
Hello. I just looked at the site. Yep..no switches, but a nice looking piece of gear reguardless!.......Hummmm....maybe someone take really knows this piece will chime in. I would like to hear the samples tho'. Good luck...
Snatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2008   #43
Lives for gear
 
Geoff_T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Tujunga
Posts: 3,634

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ciozzi View Post
I've got a problem...

How can I tame the outputs of the console without affecting the signal ? Pushing the buss the console makes the input stage of the PL2 clip

Any ideas ?
Hi

Ride the channel faders back a smidgen so that you don't build up a crazy mix level?

__________________
Geoff Tanner
Aurora Audio International

See us on Facebook

http://www.facebook.com/auroraaudio
http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may1...off-tanner.htm
http://www.auroraaudio.net/
http://www.amazon.com/Window-Past-Ge...8737082&sr=1-9
http://www.grandmasterrecorders.com

For quicker responses, please use my email (Geoff at auroraaudio.net) in preference to pm's on these forums.
Geoff_T is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2008   #44
Lives for gear
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 839

Send a message via MSN to Joram
B has some weird phase behaviour. But it might be a more accurate version of the channel coming out of the DAW (cubase?).
Somehow I like B better than A, strange .... Dunno why (perhaps because I'm busy with something else in my head?)
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2008   #45
Lives for gear
 
cynics1207's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: target studio, KL
Posts: 510

interesting! btw, joram= john oram?
cynics1207 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2008   #46
Lives for gear
 
Joram's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 839

Send a message via MSN to Joram
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynics1207 View Post
interesting! btw, joram= john oram?
Joram is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2008   #47
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fano
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to Ciozzi
Quote:
Originally Posted by cynics1207 View Post
interesting! btw, joram= john oram?
lol. This is a good one
Ciozzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19th February 2008   #48
Lives for gear
 
Infernal Device's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: USA
Posts: 1,122

I really enjoyed this! Thanks for it!

For me, I liked A. I think that there is some little sparkle in upper mids that jumps out a bit.

There is a push in the low end of B for sure, but I bet it would pile up too much for tracking and mixing on every channel.
__________________
If you want to know what god thinks of fame, look at who he gives it to.

"Are you following me camera guy?" ~Vince from Sham-WOW

"Infernal Device, enjoy your 121!!!" ~RawBeanZen 1-08-2009 on the "MORE FREE STUFF" thread
Infernal Device is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2008   #49
Gear maniac
 
Larrysings's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 247

A sounds good: nice mids, B is a little off comparatively.

What's the answer?
__________________
Larry Hammel

Vocalist/Producer/CEO
Deepwave Music Productions
http://www.deepwavemusic.com
Long Island City/NYC
Larrysings is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2008   #50
Gear maniac
 
qubi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 240

Guitar: A.. B, as mentioned by a few, has something off, phasey about it
Vocals: B..

A is clear and fine, but for some reason, especially on B, it just seams like there is more audio info there, like it it can take eq better and be sculpted more. A is more of a "here it is, take or leave it".. does that make any sense??

ok, just tried to eq in logic.. B is a lot fuller, esp. in the lows. just more harmonically rich.. but i can't quite get the strangeness of the guitar on B.. Like i said, "A" is good, like a mackie is "good", but once you push the eq, gets harsh..

Ok.. what's what????????
__________________
Qubi
SoundTrax productions, KWT
qubi1@hotmail.com
qubi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2008   #51
Lives for gear
 
Paul_G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Lot-et-Garonne France
Posts: 704

Overall so far I preferred B, i think it is more flattering to digital signals.
PG
Paul_G is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2008   #52
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London
Posts: 11

My guess: A is the 8T

Sounds how I remember; very clean, low noise, just lacks a bit of drive for my taste.
Bushmaster5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2008   #53
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Fano
Posts: 928

Thread Starter
Send a message via Skype™ to Ciozzi
It's interesting how one's warmth is another one's dull...

Anyway I just want to spend some words about the guitar samples, where most of people's preferences split. As I already said the sound was very placement dependant and I could have made one of the consoles sound better than the other. That's the reason why I took three samples, one from very close where console A has a more balanced sound, from three feet where console B has more detail and the and low-end isn't gone and the last one with the eq engaged in order for you to have a better understanding of the "edge" of the two preamps, that is the biggest difference to me, at least in this case.

For the answer you'll have to wait guys, the session I'm having right now is going to finish this evening, if I'm not too tired I'll take the last mix buss samples, post the results and then the answer.

Right ?
Ciozzi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20th February 2008   #54
Lives for gear
 
jeronimo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 3,197

Send a message via ICQ to jeronimo Send a message via AIM to jeronimo
looking foward to hear the mix buss test
jeronimo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd February 2008   #55
Lives for gear
 
jacko's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Wroc?aw, Poland
Posts: 718

Send a message via AIM to jacko Send a message via Skype™ to jacko
what's going on? I can't wait!
jacko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 22nd February 2008   #56
Lives for gear
 
Audio Hombre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,880

this is taking so long i forgot about it
Audio Hombre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2008   #57
Lives for gear
 
dasoundjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Puerto Rico
Posts: 1,092

Yeah witch one is it ?
dasoundjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2008   #58
Gear maniac
 
zoink's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Montreal QC
Posts: 162

i prefer B every step of the way. A doesn't get much love from me. now, which on is which. i own one of the two consoles...
zoink is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2008   #59
Lives for gear
 
Energie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,035

Kinda getting tired of checking this post to see if the answer of which is which has been posted yet, hasn't it been like 2 weeks?? HA, please, can you let us know which one is which. thank ya kindly.
Energie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd February 2008   #60
Lives for gear
 
3rd&4thT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 753

Relax. Once I had to wait two years to hear the punch line of a joke.

It was worth it.

3rd&4thT
3rd&4thT is offline   Reply With Quote
New Reply New Reply Submit Thread to Facebook Facebook  Submit Thread to Twitter Twitter  Submit Thread to LinkedIn LinkedIn 



Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Similar Threads
Thread Thread starter Forum Replies Last Post
Trident serie 8T or Toft audio Trident serie ATB? djanogil So much gear, so little time! 36 25th June 2009 05:33 PM
Oram/Trident 8T-16 Vs. Toft ATB 16 Apemandan High end 73 12th November 2008 09:38 PM
Toft Audio Trident Series ATB Console - new pics on Toft website! Jacklynn So much gear, so little time! 1003 4th December 2007 07:26 PM
Toft ATB or Older Trident? Deadmeat So much gear, so little time! 2 21st March 2007 07:11 PM
Trident Audio 8T - Toft 'Trident Series' ATB (SKAM)!! TooledUp So much gear, so little time! 13 25th March 2006 07:30 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:32 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Gearslutz.com Limited - UK Company Number 7597610.
Registered Office: 35 Ballards Lane, London, N3 1XW.

SEO by vBSEO ©2010, Crawlability, Inc.