![]() | All Advertisers |
| |||||||
![]() |
| | Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Rate Thread | Display Modes |
| | #1 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 47
| SSL-G Series EQ emulation shootout (audiofiles included) There are quite a few SSL EQ wannabes out there now and I was curious to see close they come to a real SSL desk. Unfortunately, while I can afford a Duende and a Liquid Mix, I don't have access to a real desk. So all I can do is compare the emulations (but i'll post the original in case anyone with access cares to run it through). I was surprised at how much they differ from each other. I don't know how they can all claim to be the SSL sound if they all act so differently. I'll post the files so anyone who's interested can hear. Obviously it's not a great way to let you chose which emulation you like best. One might be far from the real thing, and therefore have an EQ that actually sounds better on the test file I chose. But I was happy to know that I liked my most expensive purchase the most. In the running: Duende, Liquid Mix, URS S-Series, Waves SSL EQ, and Flux (just for the heck of it). The low and low-mid EQ was selected to make the kick sound better. The high end was boosted plenty to test the hat and cymbal sounds. And the strings and piano are thrown in for more comparison opportunity. Results randomized for now: answer given later. |
| | |
| | #2 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 47
| (The analog switch was off on the Waves) |
| | |
| | #3 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 47
| There are more files in this thread: LIQUID MIX VS WAVES SSL, URS, McDSP, etc.. as well as 3 API EQ emulations compared. |
| | |
| | #4 |
| Lives for gear Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,904
| I'm hearing some clippy clicks on the piano on the left channel. You're overdriving these plugins! 1: Nice and clear but no phase "magic". This is the linear phase Flux Epure. (sounds linear phase to me copperx, but maybe it isn't precisely) 2: Quite veiled and somewhat grainy. URS. 3: Forward and a little less defined than Flux, but with balls and a sheen, this is the Duende 4: Nice enough but a bit flat. This is Waves 5: A bit cheap sounding to me. Liquid Mix All of them will do the job in a pinch. The relative levels might be a bit off which might be throwing me off... but hey I guessed! Thanks for posting this eugd! |
| | |
| | #5 | |
| Gear addict | Quote:
![]()
__________________ Gearslutz.com: 'cuz it sucks to know that the gear isn't the problem ... "Do everything else right, and the equipment will disappear in insignificance." - Steve Albini "Photographers — idiots, of which there are so many — say, “Oh, if only I had a Nikon or a Leica, I could make great photographs.” That’s the dumbest thing I ever heard in my life. - Andreas Feininger | |
| | |
| | #6 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Austria
Posts: 241
| I ranked only by the drum sounds cause the string phrase doesn't make to much difference and the piano clips: 5 - Full with a bit color very nice and full, my favorite 1 - Little more natural and a bit on the cleaner side, without the nice color 4 - Big Bass maybe a bit too much, but sounds good 2 - Too much color for my taste, makes it sound a bit digital 3 - Something wired goes on there, mids sound very strange.. Did you make on all the same settings as on the screenshot? |
| | |
| | #7 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 47
| I started with each plugin on exactly the same settings (as closely as i could) at first, but then actually changed parameters slightly to make them sound more similar. They were even more different when just typing in matching values. I gave Duende the benefit of the doubt and tried to make the other plugs match it. I'll post the settings for the other plugs after people have time to listen and guess (because they would actually help you distinguish them, i think). |
| | |
| | #8 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 47
| Results are in 01 - Flux 02 - Waves 03 - Liquid Mix 04 - URS 05 - Duende You probably liked the Liquid Mix better because it had less of an extreme EQ applied. Because the high shelf cuts frequencies across the board, and the low shelf barely did anything. I pushed it to 15db boost and it didn't get nearly as bassy as the other 4 plugins. I'm assuming that's not a property of SSL desks - that you boost a high shelf and the other frequencies all drop. (see the attached photo)?? Had the same problem with API low end boost. The Liquid mix wasn't nearly as bassy as the Waves or URS models. Hope it's not a flaw of dynamic convolution. Maybe just a bug or something fixable with emulation updates? |
| | |
| | #9 |
| Gear Head Join Date: Nov 2007 Location: Toronto
Posts: 47
| You can see the curve that Liquid Mix is claiming is happening in the low end (the black one), which even after reductions from the high shelf is still claiming to be more than 10 db of boost. But listen to the files. I only had 6db or so of bass boost on the Duende and it has plenty more low end. Someone at focusrite: you tell me why I shouldn't get much bass out of my liquid mix EQs and then i'll tell you why you're wrong. |
| | |
| | #10 |
| Gear Head | Why? It's only a "real" emulation (stupid word ) with analog on I think |
| | |
| | #11 |
| Gear interested Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3
| This might well be far too late to join this discussion but I've only just joined the forums after getting hold of a liquid mix. The issue with the low end response sound like it is due to the use of the 2.0 update. There is a long thread going on the SOS forums about it and focusrite are aware of it. Apparently the safe option is to use version 1.5 at the moment due to the issue with the eq low end. Bradley |
| | |
| | #12 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 199
| could you reopen the waves preset and engage the analog button? i'm curious to hear the difference. thanks |
| | |
| | #13 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Dec 2006 Location: Austria
Posts: 241
| |
| | |
| | #14 |
| Gear addict Join Date: May 2003 Location: warsaw, poland
Posts: 372
| i didn't like the 2nd and the 3rd, rest is nice, different, but not bad of course the boost is huge ... so what is what?
__________________ http://myspace.com/witkacy_mix |
| | |
| | #15 | |
| Gear Head Join Date: Sep 2007 Location: Garden Grove, CA
Posts: 42
| Quote:
| |
| | |
| | #16 |
| Gear nut Join Date: Jul 2002 Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 84
| |
| | |
| | #17 |
| Gear maniac Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 206
|
__________________ "All theory, dear friend, is gray, but the golden tree of life springs ever green." Goethe Looking to Buy the following Neumann Telefunken M-269C Neve 1081/1093 Prism ADA-8XR or ADA8 RCA44BX/77DX/BK5/STC 4038 Ribbon Mics |
| | |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | Rate This Thread |
| |
Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| The A Designs Solid State Shootout (500 series + Pacifica) | warhead | So much gear, so little time! | 39 | 18th June 2008 01:09 AM |
| Consoles emulation: UAD Neve 88RS vs Waves SSL 4000 | SoniA | Music computers | 6 | 29th January 2008 05:50 PM |
| SSL vs AMS-Neve vs API console shootout from 2024!!! | NowWhat | The good news channel | 12 | 16th November 2007 06:36 PM |
| Distressor SSL bus comp emulation | BlakeMcKibben | So much gear, so little time! | 6 | 18th March 2007 11:29 AM |
| Waves SSl Versus UAD Neve:Samples included! | Rednose | So much gear, so little time! | 8 | 17th August 2006 12:38 AM |