Gearslutz.com
All Advertisers

Go Back   Gearslutz.com > Audio file upload / Interviews / Podcasts / Video Vault / Links > Gear Shoot-Outs / Sound File Comparisons / Audio Tests

Notices

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Rating: Thread Rating: 2 votes, 3.00 average. Display Modes
Old 27th May 2008, 01:24 PM   #91
Sourceq
Gear interested
 
Sourceq's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Finland
Posts: 23
thanks drBill for new stereo microphone ideas . I'm so excited to try this figure8 stereo technique next time i'm recording grand piano. These clips sound the way i've always wanted the grand piano sound like
Sourceq is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2008, 09:21 AM   #92
danbronson
Lives for gear
 
danbronson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 811
I probably won't be recording piano anytime soon unfortunately, but if/when I do, I'll remember that technique! It sounds great!

I preferred the Coles by a very small margin to the 205s, which also sounded great to me. For the price, the modded 205 is the obvious winner. What would the AEAs sound like inside the piano though?
danbronson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st June 2008, 10:16 PM   #93
danbronson
Lives for gear
 
danbronson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 811
I'm listening back again and now prefer the softness of the 205. The Coles has a harder sounding midrange and tighter bass, but the 205 just sounds smooth and pleasant in comparison without losing detail (that I notice anyway). They are pretty close though. I think I'll pick up a 205, maybe even mod it myself as a little DIY project.

There is a high pitched ringing going on in all the files that is beginning to drive me nuts. Is that just because they're MP3s?
danbronson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4th August 2008, 07:52 AM   #94
Tillmann
Gear Head
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 68
Thanks for doing this comparison. I've gotta say that I think the AEA's are the most consistent and natural to me. The others sound good at certain times and not as good at others depending on the clips and the dynamics, but the AEA's sound very natural and more like you're in the room. That's just due to the fact that they are backed off, yet don't sound like they are a long ways away. The others sound like, well, like you're standing there with your head in the piano, which is where the mics are. The Coles set is my number two and the 205's are number three. Too much low end for me to sound natural for this purpose on the 205's. Too smooth on the attack for me. Made the piano sound less percussive and rounder. Matter of taste. Could be a useful tool though. That mic would sound very nice in front of a bass cab!
Tillmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th December 2008, 04:11 AM   #95
Track 7
Gear addict
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 418
Thanks for such a wonderful test !
__________________
Track 7
Track 7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 8th December 2008, 10:58 AM   #96
World Studios
Lives for gear
 
World Studios's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 631
Thanks for the files. I preferred the Coles. They are a bit more open. I am not a big fan of ribbon mics at all for normal sources, but they definitely have their uses for very bright sounds, that end up sounding very thin through an SDC and thin through an LDC... I like a bright, open mic. Just tried the Black Hole. Like it. :-)
__________________
Johan Bejerholm
World Studios
Malmö, Sweden

www.worldstudios.se
World Studios is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 23rd December 2008, 05:29 AM   #97
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by luctellier View Post
The clips Sounds AMAZING! Good job!
Thanks man! It's been quite awhile since I checked this thread - I'm glad there are still people digging it. Glad you liked the clips!



Quote:
Originally Posted by Sourceq View Post
thanks drBill for new stereo microphone ideas. I'm so excited to try this figure8 stereo technique next time i'm recording grand piano. These clips sound the way i've always wanted the grand piano sound like
Awesome!!! Great to hear. It's so good to see people are still enjoying this thread and getting some good recording ideas!!



Quote:
Originally Posted by danbronson View Post
I probably won't be recording piano anytime soon unfortunately, but if/when I do, I'll remember that technique! It sounds great!

I preferred the Coles by a very small margin to the 205s, which also sounded great to me. For the price, the modded 205 is the obvious winner. What would the AEAs sound like inside the piano though?
thanks Dan! I think the AEA's would sound much better "IN" the piano, but would definitly be "thinner" or more streamlined than either the Coles or 205's. In a rock track, perhaps just the ticket, but for me, not the ticket for solo piano.



Quote:
Originally Posted by danbronson View Post
I'm listening back again and now prefer the softness of the 205. The Coles has a harder sounding midrange and tighter bass, but the 205 just sounds smooth and pleasant in comparison without losing detail (that I notice anyway). They are pretty close though. I think I'll pick up a 205, maybe even mod it myself as a little DIY project.
Killer!!! I knew you'd come around.... Seriously though, I'm still prefering the 205's - OVERALL - although the Coles definately have some cool magic at certain dynamic levels. I just don't find them preferable in the loud passages.



Quote:
Originally Posted by Tillmann View Post
Thanks for doing this comparison. I've gotta say that I think the AEA's are the most consistent and natural to me.
Cool Tillmann! You're welcome. Glad you liked the AEA's. Somebody's got too.... (j/k) They are great mics, just not my preference. We all dig something different. That's what I love about recording music! Cheers.....



Quote:
Originally Posted by Track 7 View Post
Thanks for such a wonderful test !
You're welcome!



Quote:
Originally Posted by World Studios View Post
Thanks for the files. I preferred the Coles. They are a bit more open.
You're welcome. Glad you enjoyed the shootout!!!

bp
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2009, 07:32 PM   #98
Jimr
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2
Apex 205 mod

Hello DrBill.
I recently purchased an Apex 205 after reading the online article about the
Apex/Coles 4038 shootout.
I am a jazz trumpet player living in the New York City area and I do a
lot of recording in a variety of settings. Usually I try to get the
warmest, fattest sound I can, and for me the Coles has always been my
favorite by far, it's just that the price is a little prohibitive.
I am now getting into some home recording, so I have two questions for
you:

1. As a trumpet player, is the mod to the 205 necessary and/ or
desirable?

2. (Completely unrelated) Recently I did a session with a Coles and at
the end of the date, I was playing flugelhorn on a ballad and all of a
sudden there was an octave below what I played in the head phones and
ON THE TAPE! Some engineer friends tell me it could have been a
problem with the ribbon, and that the track is basically a write-off .
Have you heard of anything like this, and do you think there might be
a way to salvage the track?

Many thanks for your time,
Jim
Jimr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2nd February 2009, 09:21 PM   #99
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimr View Post
Hello DrBill.
I recently purchased an Apex 205 after reading the online article about the
Apex/Coles 4038 shootout.
I am a jazz trumpet player living in the New York City area and I do a
lot of recording in a variety of settings. Usually I try to get the
warmest, fattest sound I can, and for me the Coles has always been my
favorite by far, it's just that the price is a little prohibitive.
I am now getting into some home recording, so I have two questions for
you:

1. As a trumpet player, is the mod to the 205 necessary and/ or
desirable?

2. (Completely unrelated) Recently I did a session with a Coles and at
the end of the date, I was playing flugelhorn on a ballad and all of a
sudden there was an octave below what I played in the head phones and
ON THE TAPE! Some engineer friends tell me it could have been a
problem with the ribbon, and that the track is basically a write-off .
Have you heard of anything like this, and do you think there might be
a way to salvage the track?

Many thanks for your time,
Jim
Hi Jim!

I do think that the 205 is a good tpt mic, although I'd hazard to guess that the 4038 MIGHT edge it out a bit due to it's more midrange approach. The 205 has a more open top end that may or may not be what your'e looking for. Certainly the coles is a great mic for what you describe as the "warmest, fattest sound I can".

Somewhere in this shootout is a clip I did of trumpet section (doubled up with one player) on the 205.

I'd say - yes, the mods to the 205 are definatly worth it. That said, sometimes low tech is better. Try the mic as is right now and see if you like it. If there's anything you don't like, then I'd send it off to michael joly and tell him your exact application and ask him to tune it specifically for your uses. There's a possibility he might suggest a fathead for your application. It's a more mid-rangey sound.

Anyway, the modded 205 works great on tpt. I wouldn't hesitate to use it there for one moment.

An octave lower huh??? Bizzare. I'm not quite sure I know what you're talking about. The ribbon couldn't possibly transpose the horn down, but maybe it's floppy loose and accentuating all the lower frequencies of the horn. I'd ask MJ about that as well. If it sounds like that "on tape" I'm afraid what you hear is what you got. Unless there is some playback or processing anomoly going on.

I think the mods are roughly around $250 or so and definately worth it IMO.

Good luck!

bp
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 3rd February 2009, 01:53 AM   #100
dkelley
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Maple Ridge, BC, Canada (by Vancouver)
Posts: 1,475
Send a message via MSN to dkelley
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jimr View Post
Hello DrBill.
I recently purchased an Apex 205 after reading the online article about the
Apex/Coles 4038 shootout.
I am a jazz trumpet player living in the New York City area and I do a
lot of recording in a variety of settings. Usually I try to get the
warmest, fattest sound I can, and for me the Coles has always been my
favorite by far, it's just that the price is a little prohibitive.
I am now getting into some home recording, so I have two questions for
you:

1. As a trumpet player, is the mod to the 205 necessary and/ or
desirable?

2. (Completely unrelated) Recently I did a session with a Coles and at
the end of the date, I was playing flugelhorn on a ballad and all of a
sudden there was an octave below what I played in the head phones and
ON THE TAPE! Some engineer friends tell me it could have been a
problem with the ribbon, and that the track is basically a write-off .
Have you heard of anything like this, and do you think there might be
a way to salvage the track?

Many thanks for your time,
Jim
haha, sounds to me like the engineer hit something while tracking and isn't admitting fault (or simply doesn't know that it occurred).

There are plenty of pitch altering fx out there and also if recording in digital then there are often simple push button switches for sampling rate and so forth that the engineer might have bumped briefly.

So I'd venture to guess that the issue is a human error of some kind and nothing to worry about in the mic (just yet).

You DO use a nylon or metal wind/pop filter between your horn and the coles, right? :-)

oh, and the track is unsave-able (other than keeping that section in there as an effect). even with really careful and amazingly step-by-step filtering you will change the tone too much if you try to remove the lower octave from that section since it's almost definitely containing upper harmonics that are intertwined with the original tone, making separation impossible.

However if it instead replaced the original (rather than mixed with it in the same take) and is a perfect one octave down replacement in real time then it might be salvageable, but considering it's a ballad and probably an exposed part the tonal change to bring it's sound back up an octave will likely be quite audible when done to just that one section that requires it.

Sorry for the bad news. Give me $5000 and I'll try it though ;-) (just kidding, I wouldn't even try it for free unless I had something to lose by not trying it personally).

Cheers,
Don
dkelley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th April 2009, 05:48 PM   #101
Jimr
Gear interested
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 2
Update

Sorry for the delay, but there is a little update in the mysterious case of the octave on the track with Coles 4038, if anyone is interested.
The engineer was using another mic at the same time, placed right next to the Coles, and when we recently went in to mix, we soloed the OTHER mic and muted the Coles and voila, no more octave.
I am wondering if anyone else has had this same experience and might know the cause.
Very bizarre.
BTW, I don't use a pop filter because I don't like the sound.
It has never been a problem in the past.

Last edited by Jimr; 6th April 2009 at 05:50 PM.. Reason: additional content
Jimr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14th September 2009, 10:33 PM   #102
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,825
Jimr - just saw your update. Weird on the octave. Are you talking about another mic just reproducing a lower octave in it's bandwidth, or the note you played actually being an octave down - like with a harmonizer?

------

Anyway, an overdue update from me as well in regards to ribbons, and my new found love for them. The more I use them, the more I'm leaving condensers and dynamics behind. I mean, I still dig ALL kinds of mics, but ribbons have such a natural "reach out and touch it" realism, that I really seem to be in love with them right now.

I've just finished a bunch of sessions where 95% of the mics I used were ribbons. Drums, Gtrs, Bones, Tpts, WW's, etc. Kind of a 40's burlesque vibe.

I ended up really loving the modded 205's on drums. They brought a lot of personality to the kit and had a "bigger" than life sound, while still sounding retro.

For the brass I ended up with Coles. The players were back a bit, and blowing hard in a big band type of style. The coles were phenomenal on the Bone, and really tamed the high stuff on Tpt. Good call for both. On WW's (Saxes and Clar's) I ended up really digging the RCA 77's. Especially on the Clarinets. WOW! Instant Benny Goodman. I used a R121 on F. Hn, but really, it didn't do much for me. Meh... OK though and I wouldn't mind having one. But I just dig the Coles and 77's better. I wish I'd brought the 205's for room mics on that session, but I made do with some M49's in Blumlein. Very cool as well, but not as dark as I would have preferred.

On solo Harmon Tpt, the Coles or the modded 205's worked great. When I was going more retro, the 4038's did the job. But on another session that was a bit more modern, the 205's on harmon were perhaps the best solo Tpt sound I've ever gotten. The "new-age" tpt artist was floored and has asked me to mark that mic as his personal fav of all time. I had it going thru a neve clone, and it has such a huge bottom on it, that really treats tpts well.

Anyway, these days I find myself first wanting a couple of 77's. They really have that dark, slow sound that says 1940 with no effort at all, and I'm not aware of any mic in production currently that does it quite as well. None of the other ribbons I've tried do it. I don't need it all the time, but it would sure be nice to have a couple for those times when pre 1960 is called for.

When I need the "modern" ribbon sound, the 205's come out. For an "in-between" mid-range sound, the Coles 4038's are a good call.

And I've been the recipient of an unforseen benefit. The use of so many fig-8 mics has brought a lot more of the "room" into the picture. Giving the recordings some personality and lessening the need for a fake "digital" alternative for "space". Very cool.

Anyway, that's my current ribbon update!!!

More ribbons = better recordings!!!
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th September 2009, 11:34 PM   #103
Empty Planet
Lives for gear
 
Empty Planet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Beautiful NYC
Posts: 1,071
Dr. Bill, I just wanted to say I think these "madness" threads of yours are great.

Always interesting.






Cheers!

__________________
..........
Lose mind.

Create.

Make it MOVE you.

.............................................
Slipperman
Empty Planet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16th September 2009, 07:05 AM   #104
Stiff
Lives for gear
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sweden
Posts: 2,191
drBill,

Just wanted to say that I've enjoyed reading your ribbon posts lately. I'm about to do some experimenting myself with ribbons, starting hopefully next month, on all kinds of instruments but mainly guitar (acoustic and electric), vocals, clarinet and flute.

Unfortunately I think 77's will be out of the question
Stiff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1st October 2009, 04:11 AM   #105
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Empty Planet View Post
Dr. Bill, I just wanted to say I think these "madness" threads of yours are great.

Always interesting.






Cheers!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stiff View Post
drBill,

Just wanted to say that I've enjoyed reading your ribbon posts lately. I'm about to do some experimenting myself with ribbons, starting hopefully next month, on all kinds of instruments but mainly guitar (acoustic and electric), vocals, clarinet and flute.

Unfortunately I think 77's will be out of the question
Thanks guys. I have fun doing them. Well, mostly.....

Yeah, at this point, used 77's that are trashed and the seller doesn't even know if they work are pushing $1500. That's just too much in these economic times. Maybe they will come down, but I have my doubts.....

Oh well. Lots more mics to explore. I'm going to do some mods to my generic China ribbons with the custom transformers from TAB/funkenwork (Oliver). Then I'm going to put Lundhals in my X15 I think. That should take me a lot further down the road ribbon-wise!!

Cheers,

bp
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 09:26 AM   #106
Michael_Joly
Lives for gear
 
Michael_Joly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Springfield, MA - Working on mics 16 hrs / day
Posts: 1,781
Quote:
Originally Posted by drBill View Post
... I'm going to do some mods to my generic China ribbons with the custom transformers from TAB/funkenwork (Oliver)....
Hey Bill, that's adventurous of you. Have you been following the troubleshooting posts for that mod over at PSW?

Yours in thread pimpage, MJ ;)
Michael_Joly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12th October 2009, 07:03 PM   #107
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael_Joly View Post
Hey Bill, that's adventurous of you. Have you been following the troubleshooting posts for that mod over at PSW?

Yours in thread pimpage, MJ ;)

M - how difficult can it be to just drop a simple transformer in? I haven't seen that thread. Got a link? I THINK I could pull off a simple transformer swap, but then again..... But before that, first I need you to put those Lundhals into my X15. Still waiting on a price. Then of course there's those 219's sitting around waiting for mods...... As for the GB 1200 mods, I've decided it's too deep for me. Not enough electronic / tube knowledge in this cranium. That is unless YOU want to build em for me....... Come on, it would be fun and educational.
drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15th October 2009, 06:02 PM   #108
Michael_Joly
Lives for gear
 
Michael_Joly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Springfield, MA - Working on mics 16 hrs / day
Posts: 1,781
Oh, I was talking about the PC board build and wiring project they've got going. There's pics and troubleshooting Q&A in that thread. Looks like its a 4+ hour project for an experienced soldering iron slinger.
Michael_Joly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 6th January 2010, 09:32 AM   #109
drBill
Lives for gear
 
drBill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: So Cal
Posts: 6,825
Quote:
Originally Posted by drBill View Post
I'm going to do some mods to my generic China ribbons with the custom transformers from TAB/funkenwork (Oliver). Then I'm going to put Lundhals in my X15 I think.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael_Joly View Post
Hey Bill, that's adventurous of you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by drBill View Post
M - how difficult can it be to just drop a simple transformer in?
FYI do-it-yourselfers :

How to Swap a Ribbon Microphone Transformer | recording hacks

drBill is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Madness octatonic instruments, guitar, bass, amps 10 8th May 2007 03:14 AM
PC madness vls Music computers 0 21st March 2007 10:03 PM
PT madness wallace The Moan Zone 13 8th August 2005 03:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:42 AM.

 
 
Powered by vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.0.0
You Rated this Thread: