![]() | All Advertisers |
| Member Services Directory | Classifieds | Reviews | Jobs | Deal Zone | Merchandise | Marketplace | Facebook App | Books, DVDs & Gadgets | Video Vault | Tips & Techniques |
| |||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| | #1 |
| Gearslutz.com admin | DAW's and hardware outboard, any sort of pattern emerging?
DAW's seem here to stay, for a while at least.... Fletcher and EveAnna, I was wondering if there was anything appearing in the crystal ball with regards to DAW's and harware outboard?
__________________ Jules Add your reviews to the new reviews area! Gearslutz on Facebook Follow my GS picks on Twitter |
| |
| | #2 |
| Gear addict Joined: Dec 2002 Location: Chicago
Posts: 459
|
I don't mean to hijack the topic, but on a related note... How many of you guys are using a lot of analog outboard when mixing on a DAW? I can mix analog using the DAW like a tape machine, and I can mix all inside the box. But when I try to combine the two, I get unhappy. Between setting up the i/o properly, compensating for latency, having some but not all parameters automatable, etc. it just seems like a big PITA to use a lot of outboard, particularly as inserts. But perhaps I just haven't got my flow down yet. Comments? |
| |
| | #3 |
| Gear maniac Joined: Sep 2002 Location: salt lake city
Posts: 211
|
Da flow thang. rollz yuktyy
|
| |
| | #4 | |
| Gear Guru Joined: Jun 2002 Location: New York City
Posts: 14,177
| Quote:
The pain for me is in compensating for the latency. I don't do inserts, but I do use mults extensively. And when mixing a lot of songs quickly, it can become a real drag. Same goes for using auxes. I generally just copy tracks, shift them by samples and use their outputs to feed the efx. Its usually one track for analog and another for digital. I record all of the returns(for recall purposes), so all of the returns are usually engaged on record. One problem I encounter when working this way, is if i close the song and I reopen it, I have to search around for the return tracks to engage(this is a problem when dealing with 70-90 tracks). I normally have everything patched a certain way, so in the IO box i rename all of the inputs and outputs to correspond to a track. For eg; Snare,bass,lead vocal, DSP7000 etc. Nowadays, I am feeling the analog thing again, because I agree working this way can kill the flow!!! And when time is of the essence, we cannot afford that.tut | |
| |
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Similar Threads | ||||
| Thread | Thread starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pro Tools and Mackie C4? Any way of this? | Zep Dude | Music computers | 1 | 29th April 2009 01:58 PM |
| Pro Tools and Mackie C4? Any way of this? | Zep Dude | Music computers | 0 | 27th April 2009 05:53 PM |
| Any idea how to achieve this sort of bass tone? AMAZING! | nick-the-sax | So much gear, so little time! | 20 | 16th April 2009 02:24 PM |
| Sort of OT: Bose Home Theater Stuff...Any Good, or Super-Overrated? | halcyo | So much gear, so little time! | 64 | 15th January 2007 02:52 PM |
| |